A Kernel Approach to Comparing Distributions

Proceedings of the 22nd AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, AAAI 2007

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 1637-1641

  Gretton, Arthur ^a   Borgwardt, Karsten M ^b   Rasch, Malte ^c   Schölkopf, Bernhard ^a   Smola, Alexander J ^d  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR BIOLOGICAL CYBERNETICS   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^c GRAZ UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Austria)

^d AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ATTRIBUTE MATCHING; DENSITY ESTIMATION; HUNGARIANS; KERNEL APPROACHES; PERFORMANCE; REPRODUCING KERNEL HILBERT SPACES; TWO-SAMPLE TESTS;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE;

EID: 85113352173     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. Anderson, N.; Hall, P.; and Titterington, D. 1994. Two-sample test statistics for measuring discrepancies between two multivariate probability density functions using kernel-based density estimates. Journal of Multivariate Analysis 50:41-54.
2. Arcones, M., and Giné, E. 1992. On the bootstrap of u and v statistics. The Annals of Statistics 20(2):655-674. Blake, C. L., and Merz, C. J. 1998. UCI repository of machine learning databases.
3. Borgwardt, K. M.; Ong, C. S.; Schonauer, S.; Vishwanathan, S. V. N.; Smola, A. J.; and Kriegel, H. P. 2005. Protein function prediction via graph kernels. Bioinformatics 21(Suppl 1):i47-i56.
4. Borgwardt, K. M.; Gretton, A.; Rasch, M. J.; Kriegel, H.P.; Schölkopf, B.; and Smola, A. J. 2006. Integrating structured biological data by kernel maximum mean discrepancy. Bioinformatics 22(14):e49-e57.
5. Caruana, R., and Joachims, T. 2004. Kdd cup. http://kodiak.cs.cornell.edu/kddcup/index.html.
6. Casella, G., and Berger, R. 2002. Statistical Inference. Pacific Grove, CA: Duxbury, 2nd edition.
7. Dudley, R. M. 2002. Real analysis and probability. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
8. Fortet, R., and Mourier, E. 1953. Convergence de la réparation empirique vers la réparation théorique. Ann. Scient. École Norm. Sup. 70:266-285.
9. Gretton, A.; Borgwardt, K.; Rasch, M.; Schölkopf, B.; and Smola, A. J. 2007. A kernel method for the two-sample-problem. In Schölkopf, B.; Platt, J.; and Hofmann, T., eds., Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, volume 19. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
10. Haussler, D. 1999. Convolutional kernels on discrete structures. Technical Report UCSC-CRL-99-10, Computer Science Department, UC Santa Cruz.
11. Hein, M.; Lal, T.; and Bousquet, O. 2004. Hilbertian metrics on probability measures and their application in svm's. In Proceedings of the 26th DAGM Symposium, 270-277. Berlin: Springer.
12. Huang, J.; Smola, A.; Gretton, A.; Borgwardt, K.; and Schölkopf, B. 2007. Correcting sample selection bias by unlabeled data. In Schölkopf, B.; Platt, J.; and Hofmann, T., eds., Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, volume 19. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
13. Johnson, N. L.; Kotz, S.; and Balakrishnan, N. 1994. Continuous Univariate Distributions. Volume 1 (Second Edition). John Wiley and Sons.
14. Kuhn, H. 1955. The Hungarian method for the assignment problem. Naval Research Logistics Quarterly 2:83-97.
15. Serfling, R. 1980. Approximation Theorems of Mathematical Statistics. New York: Wiley.
16. Steinwart, I. 2002. On the influence of the kernel on the consistency of support vector machines. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2:67-93.