Identifying the information structure of scientific abstracts: An investigation of three different schemes

Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 99-107

  Guo, Yufan ^a   Silins, Ilona ^b   Korhonen, Anna ^a   Sun, Lin ^a   Liakata, Maria ^c   Stenius, Ulla ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^b KAROLINSKA INSTITUTE   (Sweden)

^c ABERYSTWYTH UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS;

BIOMEDICAL ABSTRACTS; CONCEPTUAL STRUCTURES; FINE GRAINED; INFORMATION STRUCTURES; JOURNAL PAPER; MACHINE-LEARNING; OBJECTIVE METHODS; SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE; TASK-BASED;

ABSTRACTING;

EID: 85111777321     PISSN: 0736587X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (22)

1. J. Cohen. 1960. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20:37-46.
2. J. R. Curran, S. Clark, and J. Bos. 2007. Linguistically motivated large-scale nlp with c&c and boxer. In Proceedings of the ACL 2007 Demonstrations Session, pages 33-36.
3. K. Hirohata, N. Okazaki, S. Ananiadou, and M. Ishizuka. 2008. Identifying sections in scientific abstracts using conditional random fields. In Proc. of 3rd International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing.
4. A. Korhonen, L. Sun, I. Silins, and U. Stenius. 2009. The first step in the development of text mining technology for cancer risk assessment: Identifying and organizing scientific evidence in risk assessment literature. BMC Bioinformatics, 10:303.
5. J. Lafferty, A. McCallum, and F. Pereira. 2001. Conditionl random fields: Probabilistic models for segmenting and labeling sequence data. In Proc. of ICML.
6. J. R. Landis and G. G. Koch. 1977. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33:159-174.
7. M. Liakata and L.N. Soldatova. 2008. Guidelines for the annotation of general scientific concepts. Aberystwyth University, JISC Project Report http://ie-repository.jisc.ac.uk/88/.
8. M. Liakata, Claire Q, and L.N. Soldatova. 2009. Semantic annotation of papers: Interface & enrichment tool (sapient). In Proceedings of BioNLP-09, pages 193-200, Boulder, Colorado.
9. M. Liakata, S. Teufel, A. Siddharthan, and C. Batchelor. 2010. Corpora for the conceptualisation and zoning of scientific papers. To appear in the 7th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation.
10. J. Lin, D. Karakos, D. Demner-Fushman, and S. Khudanpur. 2006. Generative content models for structural analysis of medical abstracts. In Proceedings of BioNLP-06, pages 65-72, New York, USA.
11. J. Lin. 2009. Is searching full text more effective than searching abstracts? BMC Bioinformatics, 10:46.
12. S. Merity, T. Murphy, and J. R. Curran. 2009. Accurate argumentative zoning with maximum entropy models. In Proceedings of the 2009 Workshop on Text and Citation Analysis for Scholarly Digital Libraries, pages 19-26. Association for Computational Linguistics.
13. Y. Mizuta, A. Korhonen, T. Mullen, and N. Collier. 2005. Zone analysis in biology articles as a basis for information extraction. International Journal of Medical Informatics on Natural Language Processing in Biomedicine and Its Applications.
14. T. Mullen, Y. Mizuta, and N. Collier. 2005. A baseline feature set for learning rhetorical zones using full articles in the biomedical domain. Natural language processing and text mining, 7:52-58.
15. P. Ruch, C. Boyer, C. Chichester, I. Tbahriti, A. Geissbuhler, P. Fabry, J. Gobeill, V. Pillet, D. Rebholz-Schuhmann, C. Lovis, and A. L. Veuthey. 2007. Using argumentation to extract key sentences from biomedical abstracts. Int J Med Inform, 76:195-200.
16. H. Shatkay, F. Pan, A. Rzhetsky, and W. J. Wilbur. 2008. Multi-dimensional classification of biomedical text: Toward automated, practical provision of high-utility text to diverse users. Bioinformatics, 18:2086-2093.
17. S. Siegel and N. J. Jr. Castellan. 1988. Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences. McGrawHill, Berkeley, CA, 2nd edition.
18. L. Sun and A. Korhonen. 2009. Improving verb clustering with automatically acquired selectional preference. In Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing.
19. I. Tbahriti, C. Chichester, Frederique Lisacek, and P. Ruch. 2006. Using argumentation to retrieve articles with similar citations. Int J Med Inform, 75:488-495.
20. S. Teufel and M. Moens. 2002. Summarizing scientific articles: Experiments with relevance and rhetorical status. Computational Linguistics, 28:409-445.
21. S. Teufel, A. Siddharthan, and C. Batchelor. 2009. Towards domain-independent argumentative zoning: Evidence from chemistry and computational linguistics. In Proc. of EMNLP.
22. I. H. Witten, 2008. Data mining: practical machine learning tools and techniques with Java Implementations. http://www.cs.waikato.ac.nz/ml/weka/.