Evaluation of economic development finance tools

Financing Economic Development in the 21st Century

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 31-54

  Reese, Laura A ^a   Sands, Gary ^b  

^a MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85110565095     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781315704326-9     Document Type: Chapter

References (64)

1. Augesco. 2006. Typology of business incubation. www.crupi.biz/augesco/typology. htm (accessed June 22, 2010).
2. Bartik, T.J. 2003. Evaluating Local Economic and Employment Development: How to Assess What Works Among Programs and Policies. Kalamazoo, MI: W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.
3. Beauregard, R.A. 1999. The local employment fulcrum: Evaluating local economic performance. Economic Development Quarterly 13(l): 23-28.
4. Blakely, E.J., and N.G. Leigh. 2010. Planning Local Economic Development, 4th ed. Thousand oaks, CA: Sage.
5. Bondonio, D., and J. Engberg. 2000. Enterprise zones and employment: Evidence from the states’ programs. Regional Science and Urban Economics 39: 519-49.
6. Burstein, M.L., and A.J. Rolnick. 1995. Congress should end the bidding war among the states. Region 9: 1-13.
7. Cable, G., R.C. Feiock, and J. Kim. 1993. The consequences of institutionalized access for economic development policymaking in U.S. cities. Economic Development Quarterly 7(1): 91-97.
8. Clarke, S.E., and G.L. Gaile. 1992. The next wave: Postfederal local economic development strategies. Economic Development Quarterly 6(2): 187-98.
9. Clingermayer, J.C., and R.C. Feiock. 1990. The adoption of economic development policies by large cities: A test of economic, interest group, and institutional explanations. Policy Studies Journal 18(3): 539-52.
10. Economist. 2003. The South’s imported car factories. November 27.
11. Eisinger, P.K. 1988. The Rise of the Entrepreneurial State. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
12. Elvery, J.A. 2009. The impact of enterprise zones on resident employment: An evaluation of the enterprise zones programs of California and Florida. Economic Development Quarterly 23(1): 44-59.
13. Fasenfest, D., L.A. Reese, R.A. Rosenfeld, and P. Case. 2005. Evaluation of the Impact of EDA Economic Adjustment Program Investments. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce.
14. Fisher, R.C. 1997. The effects of state and local public services on economic development. New England Economic Review (March): 53-67.
15. Florida, R. 2002. The Rise of the Creative Class. New York: Basic Books.
16. Forkenbrock, D.J., and N.S. Foster. 1996. Highways and business location decisions. Economic Development Quarterly 10(3): 239-48.
17. Garcia-Mila, T., and T. McGuire. 1992. The contribution of publicly provided inputs to state economies. Regional Science and Urban Economics 22(2): 229-41.
18. Glazer, L., and D.R. Grimes. 2005. A New Path to Prosperity? Manufacturing and Knowledge-Based Industries as Drivers of Economic Growth. Ann Arbor, MI:Michigan Future.
19. Greenbaum, R., and J. Engberg. 2000. An evaluation of state enterprise zone policies. Policy Studies Review 17(2-3): 30-45.
20. Haughwout, A.F. 1999. New estimates of the impact of EDA public works program investments on county labor markets. Economic Development Quarterly 13(4): 371-82.
21. Hawken, P., A. Lovins, and L. Lovins. 1999. Natural Capitalism: Creating the Next Industrial Revolution. London: Earthscan.
22. Innes, J.E., and D.E. Booher. 1999. Metropolitan development as a complex system:A new approach to sustainability. Economic Development Quarterly 13(2):141-56.
23. International City/County Management Association (ICMA). 1988, 1999, 2004, 2009. Economic Development Surveys. Washington, DC: ICMA.
24. Jones, B.D., and L.W. Bachelor. 1984. Local policy discretion and the corporate surplus. In Urban Economic Development, ed. Richard Bingham and John Blair, 245-67. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
25. Kandilov, I.T., and M. Renkow. 2010. Infrastructure investment and rural economic development: An evaluation of USDA’s broadband loan program. Growth and Change 41(2): 165-91.
26. Klosterman, R.E. 1990. Community Analysis and Planning Techniques. Savage, MD:Rowman & Littlefield.
27. Kolko, J. 2010. Does Broadband Boost Local Economic Development? San Francisco:Public Policy Institute of California.
28. Koven, S.G., and T.S. Lyons. 2010. Economic Development: Strategies for State and Local Practice. Washington, DC: ICMA.
29. Krol, R. 1995. Public infrastructure and state economic development. Economic Development Quarterly 9(4): 331-38.
30. Krugman, P.R. 1996. Pop Internationalism. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
31. Ladd, H. 1998. Local Government Tax and Land Use Policies. Northampton, MA:Edward Elgar.
32. Lambert, T.E., and P.A. Coomes. 2001. An evaluation of the effectiveness of Louisville’s enterprise zone. Economic Development Quarterly 15(2): 168-80.
33. Ledebur, L.C., and D.P. Woodward. 1990. Adding a stick to the carrot: Location incentives with clawbacks, recisions, and recalibrations. Economic Development Quarterly 4(3): 221-37.
34. Malizia, E.E., and E.J. Feser. 1999. Understanding Local Economic Development.New Brunswick, NJ: Center for Urban Policy Research.
35. Markley, D.M., and K.T. McNamara. 1995. Economic and fiscal impacts of a business incubator. Economic Development Quarterly 9(3): 273-78.
36. Molina, F. 1998. Making Connections: A Study of Employment Linkage Programs. Washington, DC: Center for Community Change.
37. Munnell, A. 1990. How does public infrastructure affect regional economic performance? New England Economic Review (September/october): 11-32.
38. NBIA. 2007. National Business Incubator Association resource library. www.nbia. org/resource_library/ (accessed June 22, 2010).
39. Peters, A., and P. Fisher. 2002. State Enterprise Zone Programs: Have They Worked?Kalamazoo, MI: W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.
40. Peters, A., and P. Fisher. 2004. The failures of economic development incentives. Journal of the American Planning Association 70(1): 27-37.
41. Reese, L.A. 1998. Sharing the benefits of economic development: What cities utilize type II policies? Urban Affairs Review 33(5): 686-711.
42. Reese, L.A. 2002. Survey of Local Economic Development Policies. East Lansing:Michigan State University Global Urban Studies Program. http://gusp.msu.edu/ userdocs/scannedsurve.pdf.
43. Reese, L.A. 2006. Not just another determinants piece: Alternative hypotheses to explain local tax abatement policy. Review of Policy Research 23(2): 491-504.
44. Reese, L.A. 2008. Small business incubators. In Municipal Economic Development Toolkit, ed. S. Loveridge, L. Reese, and D. Nizalov. www.municipaltoolkit.org/ (accessed September 11, 2010).
45. Reese, L.A. 2010. Creative class or procreative class. Paper presented at the Making Cities Livable Conference, Charleston, SC, october.
46. Reese, L.A. and R.A. Rosenfeld. 2012. Comparative Civic Culture. London: Ashgate.
47. Reese, L.A., and G. Sands. 2007. Making the least of our differences? Trends in Canadian and U.S. local economic development. Canadian Public Administration 50(1): 79-99.
48. Rietveld, P. 1995. Infrastructure and spatial economic development. Annals of Regional Science 29(2): 117-19.
49. Roberts, B., and M. Cohen. 2002. Enhancing sustainable development by triple value adding to the core business of government. Economic Development Quarterly 16(2): 127-37.
50. Sands, G. 2003. Michigan’s Renaissance Zones: Eliminating taxes to attract investment and jobs in distressed communities. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 21(5): 719-34.
51. Sands, G., and L.A. Reese. 2005. Sustainability strategies in North American cities. In Sustainable Development and Planning II, ed. A.G. Kungolos, C.A. Brebbia, and E. Beriatos, 133-42. Boston: WIT Press.
52. Sands, G., and L.A. Reese. 2006. The equity impacts of municipal tax incentives: Leveling or tilting the playing field? Review of Policy Research 23(1): 71-94.
53. Sands, G., and L.A. Reese. 2007. Public Act 198 Industrial Facilities Tax Abatements. East Lansing:Michigan State University Land Policy Institute.
54. Sands, G., and L.A. Reese. 2008. Implementing economic development incentives: The case of Grand Rapids, Michigan. In Building the Local Economy, ed. D. Watson and J.C. Morris. Atlanta, GA: Carl Vinson Institute of Government.
55. Sands, G., and L.A. Reese. 2009. Michigan’s industrial tax abatements: Pyrrhic victories? In Sustaining Michigan, ed. R.W. Jelier and G. Sands, 45-62. East Lansing: Michigan State University Press.
56. Sands, G., L.A. Reese, and K. Trudeau. 2007. Tips for TIFs: Policies for neighborhood tax increment financing districts. Journal of the Community Development Association 38(2): 68-86.
57. Sharp, E., and D. Elkins. 1991. The politics of economic development. Economic Development Quarterly 5(2): 126-39.
58. Sherman, H., and D.S. Chappell. 1998. Methodological challenges in evaluating business incubator outcomes. Economic Development Quarterly 12(4): 313-21.
59. Spencer, J.H., and P. ong. 2004. An analysis of the Los Angeles revitalization zone:Are place-based investment strategies effective under moderate economic conditions? Economic Development Quarterly 18(4): 368-83.
60. Tassonyi, A.T. 2005. Local Economic Development: Theory and the Ontario Experience.ITP Paper No. 0511, Toronto, ontario, Canada: University of Toronto Rothman School of Management Institute for International Business.
61. Tornatzky, L., Y. Batts, N. McCrea, M. Lewis, and L. Quittman. 1995. The Art and Craft of Technology Business Incubation: Best Practices, Strategies, and Tools from 50 Programs. Athens oH: National Business Incubation Association.
62. Wadley, D., and P. Smith. 2003. Straightening up shift-share analysis. Annals of Regional Science 37(2): 259-61.
63. Weber, R. 2003. Equity and entrepreneurialism: The impact of tax increment financing on school finance. Urban Affairs Review 38(5): 619-44.
64. Wilder, M.G., and B.M. Rubin. 1996. Rhetoric versus reality: A review of studies on state enterprise zones programs. Journal of the American Planning Association 62(4): 473-91.