Sharing the benefits of economic development: What cities use type II policies?

Urban Affairs Review

Volumn 33, Issue 5, 1998, Pages 686-711

  Reese, Laura A ^a  

^a WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ECONOMIC POLICY; PLANNING PROCESS; POLICY CHOICE; TYPE II POLICY; URBAN PLANNING;

USA;

EID: 0031876049     PISSN: 10780874     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/107808749803300504     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Ahlbrandt, R. S., and J. P. DeAngelis. 1987. Local options for economic development in a maturing industrial region. Economic Development Quarterly 1 (February):41-51.
2. Babcock, R. F. 1987. Foreword. Law and Contemporary Problems 50 (1): 1-4.
3. Bingham, R. D. 1976. The adoption of innovation by local government. Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath.
4. Bowman, A. O. 1988. Competition for economic development among southeastern cities. Urban Affairs Quarterly 4 (June):511-27.
5. Clarke, S. E. 1984. The local state and alternative economic development strategies: Gaining public benefits from private investment. Discussion paper. Center for Public Public Research, University of Colorado, Boulder.
6. Clingermayer, J., and R. Feiock. 1990. The adoption of economic development policies by large cities: A test of economic, interest group, and institutional explanations. Policy Studies Journal 18 (Spring):539-52.
7. Eisenschitz, A. 1993. Business involvement in community: Counting the spoons or economic renewal? In Community economic development: Policy formation in the US and UK, edited by D. Fasenfest, 141-56. London: Macmillan.
8. Eisinger, P. K. 1988. The rise of the entrepreneurial state. Madison: Univ. of Wisconsin Press.
9. Elkins, D. R. 1995. Testing competing explanations for the adoption of Type II policies. Urban Affairs Review 30 (July):809-39.
10. Fainstein, S., N. Fainstein, R. C. Hill, D. R. Judd, and M. P. Smith. 1983. Restructuring the city. New York: Longman.
11. Feiock, R., and J. Clingermayer. 1986. Municipal representation, executive power, and economic development policy administration. Policy Studies Journal 15 (December):211-29.
12. Goetz, E. G. 1990. Type II policy and mandated benefits in economic development. Urban Affairs Quarterly 26 (December): 170-90.
13. _. 1994. Expanding possibilities in local development policy: An examination of U.S. cities. Political Research Quarterly 47 (1):85-109.
14. Hill, R. C. 1984. Economic crisis and political response in the motor city. In Sunbelt snowbelt urban development and regional restructuring, edited by L. Sawers and W. K. Tabb, 313-38. New York: Oxford University Press.
15. Loftman, P. 1995. The politics of evaluation research: A case study of Birmingham's prestige projects. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Urban Affairs Association, Portland, OR, May.
16. Miranda, R., and D. Rosdil. 1995. From boosterism to qualitative growth: Classifying economic development strategies. Urban Affairs Review 30 (July):868-79.
17. Ohren, J. F., and L. A. Reese. 1996. You get what you pay for: Professionalism, resources, and local economic development policies. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Urban Affairs Association, New York, March.
18. Pelissero, J. P. 1986. Intrametropolitan economic development policies: An exploratory look at suburban competition and cooperation. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, April.
19. Peterson, P. E. 1981. City limits. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.
20. Reese, L. A. 1997a. The use of planning methodologies in local economic development policy-making. Government and Policy/Environment and Planning C 15:285-303.
21. _. 1997b. Local economic development policy: The U.S. and Canada. New York: Garland.
22. Reese, L. A., and C. Cooper. 1995. Planning and evaluating local economic development policies: Practices in Canadian and U.S. cities. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Associate Collegiate Schools of Planning, Detroit, MI, October.
23. Reese, L. A., and D. Fasenfest. 1997. What works best? Values and the evaluation of local economic development policy. Economic Development Quarterly 11:195-207.
24. Rosenfeld, R. A., L. A. Reese, S. Wamsley, and V. Georgeau. 1995. Twenty years of community development black grant spending: Patterns and priorities in six Michigan cities. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, April.
25. Rubin, H. J. 1988. Shoot anything that flies; claim anything that falls; conversations with economic development practitioners. Economic Development Quarterly 3 (August):236-51.
26. Sanyika, M. K. 1986. Balanced development: Part two. A classification of existing linkages and partnerships. Economic Development and Law Center Report, Fall, 19-22.
27. Schwarz, J. E., and T. J. Volgy. 1992. The impacts of economic development strategies on wages: Exploring the effect on public policy at the local level. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Chicago, September.
28. Wolman, H. 1988. Local economic development policy: What explains the divergence between policy analysis and political behavior? Journal of Urban Affairs 10:19-28.