Evaluating national urban planning: Is dutch planning a success or failure?

New Principles in Planning Evaluation

Volumn , Issue , 2016, Pages 222-238

  Korthals Altes, Willem K ^a  

^a DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85108749796     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781315248004-22     Document Type: Chapter

References (50)

1. Aken, J.E. van (2004), ‘Management Research Based on the Paradigm of the Design Sciences: The Quest for Field-Tested and Grounded Technological Rules’, Journal of Management Studies 41(2), pp. 219-46.
2. Aken, J.E. van (2005a), ‘Valid Knowledge for the Professional Design of Large and Complex Design Processes’, Design Studies 26(4), pp. 379-404.
3. Aken, J.E. van (2005b), ‘Management Research as a Design Science: Articulating the Research Products of Mode 2 Knowledge Production in Management’, British Journal of Management 16(1), pp. 19-36.
4. Behn, R.D. (2003), ‘Why Measure Performance? Different Purposes Require Different Measures’, Public Administration Review 63(5), pp. 586-606.
5. Boelhouwer, P.J. (2002), ‘Trends in Dutch Housing Policy and the Shifting Position of the Social Rented Sector’, Urban Studies 39(2), pp. 219-35.
6. Boelhouwer, P.J. (2005), ‘The Incomplete Privatization of the Dutch Housing Market: Exploding House Prices versus Falling House-building Output’, Journal of Housing and the Built Environment 20(4), pp. 363-78.
7. Bratman, M.E. (1987), Intention, Plans, and Practical Reason, Cambridge, MA/London, Harvard University Press.
8. Bruijn, H. de (2002), ‘Performance Measurement in the Public Sector: Strategies to Cope with the Risks of Performance Measurement’, International Journal of Public Sector Management 15(6-7), pp. 578-94.
9. CBS (2005), Regionale kerncijfers Nederland [regional key figures Netherlands], CBS, Voorburg/Heerlen), .
10. Dipert, R.R. (1993), Artifacts, Art Works and Agency, Philadelphia, Temple University Press.
11. Eekels, J. and Roozenburg, N.F.M. (1991), ‘A Methodological Comparison of the Structures of Scientific Research and Engineering Design: Their Similarities and Differences’, Design Studies 12(4), pp. 197-203.
12. Faludi, A. (1973), Planning Theory, Oxford, Pergamon.
13. Faludi, A. (1986), Critical Rationalism and Planning Methodology, London, Pion.
14. Faludi, A. (1996), ‘Framing with Images’, Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 23(1), pp. 93-108
15. Faludi, A. (2000), ‘The Performance of Spatial Planning’, Planning Practice and Research 15(4), 299-318.
16. Faludi, A. and Korthals Altes, W.K. (1996), ‘Marketing Planning and its Dangers: How the New Housing Crisis in The Netherlands Came About’, Town Planning Review 67(2), pp. 183-202.
17. Faludi, A. and Korthals Altes, W. (1997), ‘Evaluating Communicative Planning’, in D. Borri,A. Khakee and C. Lacirignola (eds.), Evaluating Theory-Practice and Urban-Rural Interplay in Planning, Dordrecht, Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 3-22.
18. Faludi, A. and Mastop, J.M. (1982), ‘The ‘IOR School’: The Development of a Planning Methodology’, Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 9(1), pp. 241-56.
19. Faludi, A. and Valk, A.J. van der (1994), Rule and Order: Dutch Planning Doctrine in the Twentieth Century, Dordrecht, Kluwer Academic Publishers.
20. Friend, J.K. and Jessop, W.N. (1969), Local Government and Strategic Choice, London, Tavistock Publications.
21. Helling, A. (1998), ‘Changing Intra-Metropolitan Accessibility in the US: Evidence from Atlanta’, Progress in Planning 49(2), pp. 55-107.
22. Houkes, W. (2002), ‘Normativity in Quine’s Naturalism: The Technology of Truth-Seeking?’, Journal for General Philosophy of Science 33(2), pp. 251-67.
23. Jong, M. de (2004), ‘The Pitfalls of Family Resemblance: Why Transferring Planning Institutions between ‘Similar Countries’ is Delicate Business’, European Planning Studies 12(7), pp. 1055-68.
24. Knudsen, T. (1988), ‘Success in Planning’, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 12(4), pp. 550-65.
25. Kolpron (2000), Kostenverhaal in de grondexploitatie op VINEX-locaties (Voorburg, Neprom), , accessed 22 March 2004.
26. Korthals Altes, W.K. (1992), ‘How Do Planning Doctrines Function in a Changing Environment’, Planning Theory 7-8, pp. 110-15.
27. Korthals Altes, W.K. (1994), ‘Preparing for Performance: The Dutch Experience’, European Spatial Research and Policy 1(1), pp. 77-85.
28. Korthals Altes, W.K. (2000), ‘Economic Forces and Dutch Strategic Planning’ in W. Salet and A. Faludi (eds) The Revival of Strategic Spatial Planning, Amsterdam, Royal Academy of Arts and Sciences, pp. 67-77.
29. Korthals Altes, W.K. (2006), ‘Stagnation in Housing Production: Another Success in the Dutch ‘Planner’s Paradise’?’, Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 33(1), pp. 97-114.
30. Korthals Altes, W.K. (2007), ‘The Impact of Abolishing Social Housing Grants on the Compact City Policy of Dutch Municipalities’, Environment and Planning A 39(6), pp. 1497-512.
31. Kroes, P. (1998), ‘Technological Explanations: The Relation between Structure and Function of Technological Objects’, Society for Philosophy and Technology 3(3), 18-34, , accessed 20 September 2006.
32. Kroes, P. (2001), ‘Technical Functions as Dispositions: A Critical Assessment’, Techné: Journal of the Society for Philosophy and Technology 5(3), 1-16, , accessed 20 September 2006.
33. Kroes, P. (2002), ‘Design Methodology and the Nature of Technical Artefacts’, Design Studies 23(3), pp. 287-302.
34. Kroes, P., Franssen, M., Poel, I. van de and Ottens, M. (2006), ‘Treating Socio-technical Systems as Engineering Systems: Some Conceptual Problems’, Systems Research and Behavioral Science 23(6), pp. 803-14.
35. Laurian L., Day, M., Berke, P., Ericksen, N., Backhurst, M., Crawford, J. and Dixon, J. (2004), ‘Evaluating Plan Implementation: A Conformance-Based Methodology’, Journal of the American Planning Association 70(4), pp. 471-80.
36. Louw, E., Krabben, E. van der and Priemus, H.(2003), ‘Spatial Development Policy: Changing Roles for Local and Regional Authorities in the Netherlands’, Land Use Policy 20(4), pp. 357-66.
37. Needham, B. (1997), ‘Land Policy in the Netherlands’, Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie 88(3), pp. 291-96.
38. Needham, B. (2000), ‘Spatial Planning as a Design Discipline: A Paradigm for Western Europe?’, Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 27(3), pp. 437-53.
39. Needham, B. and Faludi, A. (1999), ‘Dutch Growth Management in a Changing Market’, Planning Practice and Research 14(4), pp. 481-91.
40. Osborne, D. and Gaebler, T. (1992), Reinventing Government: How the Entrepreneurial Spirit is Transforming the Public Sector, Reading, MA, Addison-Wesley.
41. Preston, B. (2003), ‘Of Marigold Beer: A Reply to Vermaas and Houkes’, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 54(4), pp. 601-12.
42. Priemus, H. (1995), ‘How to Abolish Social Housing-The Dutch Case’, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 19(1), pp. 145-55.
43. Redström, J. (2006) ‘Towards User Design? On the Shift from Object to User as the Subject of Design’, Design Studies 27(2), pp. 123-39.
44. Romme, L.G.A. (2003), ‘Making a Difference: Organization as Design’, Organization Science 14(5), pp. 558-73.
45. Simon, H.A. (1996), The Sciences of the Artificial, 3rd edn, Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.
46. Simon, H.A. (2002), ‘Forecasting the Future or Shaping It?’, Industrial and Corporate Change 11(3), pp. 601-605.
47. Talen, E. (1997), ‘Success, Failure, and Conformance: An Alternative Approach to Planning Evaluation’, Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 24(4), pp. 573-87.
48. Verhage, R. (2003), ‘The Role of the Public Sector in Urban Development: Lessons from Leidsche Rijn Utrecht (The Netherlands)’, Planning Theory and Practice 4(1), pp. 29-44.
49. Vermaas, P.E. and Houkes, W. (2003), ‘Ascribing Functions to Technical Artefacts: A Challenge to Etiological Accounts of Functions’, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 54(2), pp. 261-89.
50. Vigar, G. and Healey, P. (1999), ‘Territorial Integration and ‘Plan-led’ Planning’, Planning Practice and Research 14(2), pp. 153-69.