The Impact of Task-Technology Fit in Technology Acceptance and Utilization Models

10th Americas Conference on Information Systems, AMCIS 2004

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages 3306-3311

  Dishaw, Mark T ^a   Strong, Diane M ^b   Bandy, D Brent ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN OSHKOSH   (United States)

^b WORCESTER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

Task Technology Fit; Technology Acceptance; TTF; UTAUT; Utilization Models

Indexed keywords

INFORMATION SYSTEMS; INFORMATION USE;

COMPUTER SELF-EFFICACY; EXPLANATORY POWER; TASK TECHNOLOGY FIT; TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE; TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE MODEL; TECHNOLOGY UTILIZATION; USER ACCEPTANCE OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; UTAUT; UTILIZATION MODEL;

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH;

EID: 85108343431     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (21)

1. Ajzen, I. "From Intentions to Actions: A Theory of Planned Behavior". In J. Kuhl, & J. Beckmann (Ed.), Action Control: From Cognition to Behavior (pp. 11-39). New York, 1985, Springer Verlag.
2. Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ:, 1980, Prentice Hall.
3. Chin, W. W. “The Partial Least Squares Approach for Structural Equation Modeling,” in Modern Methods for Business Research, George A. Marcoulides (ed.), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, New York, 1998, pp. 295-336.
4. Chin, W. W., Marcolin, B. L., and Newsted, P. R. “A Partial Least Squares Latent Variable Modeling Approach for Measuring Interaction Effects: Results from a Monte Carlo Simulation Study and Voice Mail Emotion/Adoption Study,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Systems, December 1996, Cleveland, OH.
5. Compeau, D.R. and C.A. Higgins (1995). “Computer Self-Efficacy: Development of a Measure and Initial Test”, MIS Quarterly, 19(2), pp. 189-211.
6. Davis, F.D. "Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology", MIS Quarterly, 1989, 13(3): 318-339.
7. Davis, F.D., Bagozzi, R.P. and Warshaw, P.R. “User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models,” Management Science (35:8), 1989, pp. 982-1003
8. Dennis, A.R., Wixom, B.H., Vandenberg, R.J. “Understanding Fit and Appropriation Effects in Group Support Systems via Meta-Analysis” MIS Quarterly (25:2) 2001, pp. 167-193.
9. Dishaw, M.T. and Strong, D.M. “Supporting Software Maintenance with Software Engineering Tools: A Computed Task-Technology Fit Analysis,” Journal of Systems and Software (44:2), 1998, pp. 107-120.
10. Dishaw, M.T. and Strong, D.M. “Extending the Technology Acceptance Model with Task-Technology Fit Constructs,” Information and Management (36:1), 1999, pp. 9-21.
11. Dishaw, M.T., Strong, D.M. and Bandy, D. B. “Developing a General Method to Access Task-Technology Fit”, Proceedings of the Fifth Americas Conference on Information Systems, August 1999, Milwaukee, WI.
12. Goodhue, D.L. “Supporting Users of Corporate Data: The Effect of I/S Policy Choices,” Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1988.
13. Goodhue, D.L. “Understanding User Evaluations of Information Systems,” Management Science (41:12), 1995, pp. 1827-1844.
14. Goodhue, D.L. and Thompson, R.L. “Task-Technology Fit and Individual Performance,” MIS Quarterly (19:2), 1995, pp. 213-236.
15. Taylor, S. and Todd, P.A. “Understanding Information Technology Usage: A Test of Competing Models,” Information Systems Research (6:2), 1995, pp. 144-176.
16. Thompson, R.L., Higgins C.A., Howell, J.M. “Personal Computing: Toward a Conceptual Model of Utilization”. MIS Quarterly, 1991, 15, pp.125-143.
17. Thompson, R.L., Higgins C.A., Howell, J.M. “Influence of Experience on Personal Computer Utilization: Testing a Conceptual Model”. Journal of Management Information Systems, 1994. 11(1): pp. 167-187.
18. Venkatesh., V., Morris, M.G., Davis, G.B., Davis, F.D. “User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View”, MIS Quarterly, 2003, 27(3), pp. 425-478.
19. Venkatraman, N. “The Concept of Fit in Strategy Research: Toward Verbal and Statistical Correspondence”, Academy of Management Review (14:3), 1989, pp. 423-444.
20. Zigurs, I. and Buckland, B.K. “A Theory of Task/Technology Fit and Group Support Systems Effectiveness”, MIS Quarterly (22:3) 1998, pp. 313-334.
21. Zigurs, I., Buckland, B.K., Connolly, J.R., Wilson, E.V. “A Test of Task-Technology Fit Theory for Group Support Systems”, DATA BASE (30:3,4) 1999, pp. 34-50.