A relevance theory approach to the investigation of inferential processes in translation

Benjamins Translation Library

Volumn 45, Issue , 2003, Pages 3-24

  Alves, Fabio ^a   Goncąlves, José Luiz V R ^b  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF MINAS GERAIS   (Brazil)

^b FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF OURO PRETO   (Brazil)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85106694741     PISSN: 09297316     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1075/btl.45.04alv     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (30)

1. Alves, F. (1995). Zwischen Schweigen und Sprechen: Wie bildet sich eine transkulturelle Brücke?: Eine psycholinguistisch orientierte Untersuchung von Übersetzungsvorgängen zwischen portugiesischen und brasilianischen Übersetzern. Hamburgo: Dr. Kovac.
2. Alves, F. (1996). Lancąndo anzoís: Uma análise cognitiva de processos mentais em traducąõ. Revista de Estudos da Linguagem, 2(4), 77-90.
3. Alves, F. (2000). Establishing criteria for a definition of translation competence. In Proceedings of the 12th World Congress of the International Association of Applied Linguistics. AILA 99. Tokyo:Waseda University. CD-Rom.
4. Alves, F. (Ed.). (2001a). Teoria da Relevância &Traducąõ: Conceituações e Aplicações [Estudos Linguisticos 4]. Belo Horizonte: FALE.
5. Alves, F. (2001b). A triangulacąõ como opcąõ metodológica em pesquisas empíricoexperimentais em traducąõ. In A. S. Pagano (Ed.), Metodologias de Pesquisa em Traducąõ [Estudos Linguisticos 3] (pp. 69-93). Belo Horizonte: FALE.
6. Alves, F., Goncąlves, J. L., & Rothe-Neves, R. (2001). In search of a definition of translation competence: The structure and development of an ongoing research project. Quaderns Revista de Traducció, 6, 46-49.
7. Alves, F., Magalhães, C., & Pagano, A. (2000). Traduzir com Autonomia: Estratégias para o Tradutor em Formacąõ. Saõ Paulo: Contexto.
8. Blass, R. (1990). Relevance Relations in Discourse: A Study with Special Reference to Sissala. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
9. Blakemore, D. (1987). Semantic Constraints on Relevance. Oxford: Blackwell.
10. Chesterman, A. (1997). Explanatory adequacy and falsifiability in translation theory. In K. Klaudy & J. Kohn (Eds.), Transferre Necesse Est: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Current Trends in Studies of Translation and Interpreting (pp. 219-224). Budapest: Scholastica.
11. Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge: MIT Press.
12. Chomsky, N. (1980). Rules and Representations. New York: Columbia University.
13. Fodor, J. (1983). The Modularity of Mind. Cambridge: MIT Press.
14. Goncąlves, J. L. (1998). Processos inferenciais relacionados à priorizacąõ de informações na traducąõ de legendas de filmes: O redundante e o relevante sob a ótica do princípio de relevância. (MA Dissertation in Linguistic Studies)-Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, unpublished.
15. Goncąlves, J. L. (2003). O desenvolvimento da competência do tradutor: Investigando o processo através de um estudo exploratório-experimental [The development of translator competence: Investigating the process through an exploratory-experimental study]. Belo Horizonte: FALE/UFMG. (unpubl. PhD Thesis).
16. Grice, P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In A. P.Martinich (Ed.), The Philosophy of Language (pp. 159-170). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
17. Gutt, E.-A. (2000a). Translation and Relevance: Cognition and Context. Manchester: St. Jerome.
18. Gutt, E.-A. (2000b). Issues of translation research in the inferential paradigm of communication. In M. Olohan (Ed.), Intercultural Faultlines. Research Models in Translation Studies I. Textual and Cognitive Aspects (pp. 161-179). Manchester: St. Jerome.
19. Hansen, G. (this volume). Controlling the process: Theoretical and methodological reflections on research into translation processes.
20. Jakobsen, A. (this volume). Effects of think aloud on translation speed, revision and segmentation.
21. Jakobsen, A. (1999). Logging target text production with Translog. In G. Hansen (Ed.), Probing the Process in Translation: Methods and Results [Copenhagen Studies in Language 24] (pp. 9-20). Copenhagen: Samfundslitteratur.
22. Keen, K. (1988). Vad ar kompetens? Mitt forlag, Malmo, Sweeden. cit in: Jan Österlund Providing Competence to the product development project: A conflict between fragmentary learning and holistic use. Systems Research and Behavioral Science (Jan 1999) 16 iI p41(1).
23. Königs, F. (1987).Was beim Übersetzen passiert. Theoretische Aspekte, empirische Befunde und praktische Konsequenzen. Die Neueren Sprachen, 2, 162-185.
24. Königs, F. (1990).Wie theoretisch muss die Übersetzungswissenschaft sein? Gedanken zum Theorie-Praxis-Problem. Taller de Letras 1/18, 103-120.
25. Maturana, H. (2001). Cognicąõ, ciência e vida cotidiana. In C. Magro & V. Paredes (Eds.). Belo Horizonte: UFMG.
26. Moeschler, J. (1998). Directional inferences and the conceptual/procedural enconding distinction. 2nd Relevance Theory Workshop-Programme and abstracts, 3-8. (unpublished).
27. PACTE (this volume). Building a translation competence model.
28. Shannon, J. & Weaver, J. (1949). The Mathematical Theory of Communication. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
29. Sperber, D. & Wilson, D. (1986/1995). Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.
30. Wilson, D. & Sperber, D. (1993). Linguistic form and relevance. Lingua 90, 1/2, 1-25.