An evaluation and critique of current rankings

Higher Education Dynamics

Volumn 37, Issue , 2012, Pages 39-70

  Federkeil, Gero ^a   van Vught, Frans A ^b   Westerheijden, Don F ^b  

^a Centre for Higher Education Development (CHE)   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Composite Indicator; Global Ranking; High Education Institution; Integrate Postsecondary Education Data System; League Table

Indexed keywords

EID: 85103942541     PISSN: 15710378     EISSN: 22151923     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-3005-2_4     Document Type: Chapter

References (43)

1. AACSB. (2005). The business school rankings dilemma. A report from a task force of AACSB International’s Committee on Issues in Management Education. Tampa: AACSB.
2. AUBR Expert Group. (2009). Assessing Europe’s university-based research – Draft. s. l. Brussels: European Commission – DG Research.
3. Brennan, J., Goedegebuure, L. C. J., Shah, T., Westerheijden, D. F., & Weusthof, P. J. M. (1992). Towards a methodology for comparative quality assessment in European higher education: A pilot study on economics in Germany, the Netherlands and the United Kingdom. London/ Enschede/Hannover: CNAA/CHEPS/HIS.
4. Brown, R. (2006). League tables – Do we have to live with them? Perspectives, 10(2), 33–38.
5. Cremonini, L., Westerheijden, D. F., & Enders, J. (2008). Disseminating the right information to the right audience: Cultural determinants in the use (and misuse) of rankings. Higher Education, 55, 373–385.
6. Dill, D. D., & Soo, M. (2005). Academic quality, league tables, and public policy: A cross-national analysis of university ranking systems. Higher Education, 49, 495–533.
7. Eccles, J. S., & Gootman, J. A. (2002). Community programs to promote youth development. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
8. Enserink, M. (2007). Who ranks the university rankers? Science, 317(5841), 1026–1028.
9. Filliatreau, G. & Zitt, M. (s. a.). Big is (made) Beautiful. Some comments about the Shanghai ranking of world-class universities. s. l. Paris: OST.
10. Gottlieb, B. (2009). Cooking the School Books: How U.S. News cheats in picking its ‘best American colleges’. Slate, September 1, 2009.
11. Hazelkorn, E. (2011). Rankings and the reshaping of higher education: The battle for world-class excellence. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
12. Högskolverket. (2009). Ranking of universities and higher education institutions for student information purposes? (No. 2009:27 R). Stockholm: Högskoleverket.
13. International Ranking Expert Group. (2006). Berlin principles on ranking of higher education institutions. Retrieved June 24, 2006, from http://www.che.de/downloads/Berlin_ Principles_ IREG_534. pdf
14. IREG Observatory (2011). IREG Ranking Audit Manual. IREG Observatory on Academic Rankings and Excellence, 2011. Available at: http://www.ireg-observatory.org/pdf/ranking_ audith_audit.pdf
15. King, R., Locke, W., Puncher, M., Richardson, J., & Verbik, L. (2008). Counting what is measured or measuring what counts? League tables and their impact on higher education institutions in England (No. April 2008/14). s. l. Higher Education Funding Council for England, Bristo.
16. Klein, S. P., & Hamilton, L. (1998). The validity of the U. S. News & World Report ranking of ABA Law Schools. s. l. Association of American Law Schools.
17. Leeuw, F. L. (2002). Evaluating and the ranking of higher education studies. In J. Bevers & M. Hulshof (Eds.), Willems & wetens, liber amicorum voor Jos Willems (pp. 141–154). Nijmegen: IOWO/KUN.
18. Marginson, S. (2006, September 7–9). Global university rankings: private and public goods. Paper presented at the 19th Annual CHER conference, Kassel, Germany.
19. Marginson, S. (2008). Global, multiple and engaged: Has the ‘Idea of a University’ changed in the era of the global knowledge economy? Paper presented at the fifth international workshop on Higher Education Reforms ‘The Internationalization of Higher Education and Higher Education Reforms’, Shanghai, China.
20. Marginson, S. (2009). University rankings, government and social order: Managing the field of higher education according to the logic of the performative present-as-future. In M. Simons, M. Olssen, & M. Peters (Eds.), Re-reading education policies: Studying the policy agenda of the 21st century. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
21. Merisotis, J. P. (2003). On the ranking of higher education institutions. Higher Education in Europe, 27(4), 361–364.
22. Moed, H. F. (2005). Citation analysis in research evaluation. Dordrecht: Springer.
23. Müller-Böling, D., & Federkeil, G. (2007). The CHE-Ranking of German, Swiss and Austrian Universities. In J. Sadlak & L. N. Cai (Eds.), The world-class university an ranking: Aiming beyond status (pp. 189–203). Bucharest: CEPES.
24. National Opinion Research Center (1997). A review of the methodology for the U.S. news & world report’s rankings of undergraduate colleges and universities. The Washington Monthly Review Online. Retrieved January 23, 2012, from http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/features/2000/norc.html
25. OECD (2008). Handbook on constructing composite indicators. Paris, OECD.
26. Sadlak, J., & Liu, N. C. (2007). The world-class university and ranking: Aiming beyond status. Bucharest, Romania/ Shanghai, China/ Cluj-Napoca, Romania: UNESCO-CEPES.
27. Saisana, M., & D’Hombres, B. (2008). Higher education rankings: Robustness issues and critical assessment. How much confidence can we have in higher education rankings? Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
28. Salmi, J. (2009). The challenge of establishing world-class universities. Washington, D. C.: World Bank.
29. SCImago Research Group. (2009). SCImago Institutions Rankings (SIR): 2009 World Report. Retrieved November 11, 2009, from http://www.scimagoir.com/pdf/sir_2009_world_report. pdf
30. Stigler, G. J. (1961). The economics of information. Journal of Political Economy, LXIX, 213–225.
31. Thibaud, A. (2009). Vers quel classement européen des universités? Etude comparative du classement de Shanghai et des autres classements internationaux (No. Note de Benchmarking 4). Brussels/Paris: Institut Thomas More.
32. Usher, A., & Savino, M. (2006). A world of difference: A global survey of university league tables. Toronto: Educational Policy Institute.
33. van der Wende, M. (2008). Rankings and classifications in higher education. A European perspective. In J. C. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. 23). Dordrecht: Springer.
34. van der Wende, M., & Westerheijden, D. F. (2009). Rankings and classifications: The need for a multidimensional approach. In F. A. van Vught (Ed.), Mapping the higher education landscape: Towards a European classification of higher education (pp. 71–86). Dordrecht: Springer.
35. Van Dyke, N. (2005). Twenty years of university report cards. Higher Education in Europe, 30(2), 103–125.
36. van Raan, A. F. J. (2005). Fatal attraction: Conceptual and methodological problems in the ranking of universities by bibliometric methods. Scientometrics, 62(1), 133–143.
37. van Vught, F. A. (2008). Mission diversity and reputation in higher education. Higher Education Policy, 21(2), 151–174.
38. van Vught, F. A. (Ed.). (2009). Mapping the higher education landscape: Towards a European classification of higher education. Dordrecht: Springer.
39. Vedder, R., & Ewalt, D. M. (2009). America’s best colleges. Forbes, August 5, 2009.
40. Visser, M. S., & Moed, H. F. (2008). Comparing web of science and scopus on a paper-by-paper basis. Paper presented at the 10th international conference on Science & Technology Indicators, Vienna.
41. Westerheijden, D. F. (2009). Information of quality and quality of information to match students and programme. In J. Newton & R. Brown (Eds.), The future of quality assurance. Amsterdam: EAIR.
42. Westerheijden, D. F., Beerkens, E., Cremonini, L., Huisman, J., Kehm, B., Kovac, A., et al. (2010). The first decade of working on the European Higher Education Area: The Bologna Process Independent Assessment – Executive summary, overview and conclusions. s. l. Vienna: European Commission, Directorate-General for Education and Culture.
43. Yorke, M. (1998). The Times’ league table of universities, 1997: A statistical appraisal. Quality Assurance in Education, 6(1), 58.