“Resilience Thinking” for Planning

GeoJournal Library

Volumn 106, Issue , 2013, Pages 17-37

  Eraydin, Ayda ^a  

^a MIDDLE EAST TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Communicative Rationality; Instrumental Rationality; Social Vulnerability; Urban Land; Urban System

Indexed keywords

EID: 85103878734     PISSN: 09245499     EISSN: 22150072     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-5476-8_2     Document Type: Chapter

References (96)

1. Albrechts, L. (2006). Bridge the gap: From spatial planning to strategic projects. European Planning Studies, 14(10), 1487–1500.
2. Albrechts, L. (2010). More of the same is not enough! How could strategic spatial planning be instrumental in dealing with the challenges ahead? Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 37(6), 1115–1127.
3. Alexander, E. R. (2000). Rationality revisited: Planning paradigms in a post-modernist perspective. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 19(3), 242–256.
4. Alexander, E. R. (2006). Evaluations and rationalities: Reasoning with values in planning. In E. R. Alexander (Ed.), Evaluation in planning: Evolution and prospects (pp. 39–52). Aldershot: Ashgate.
5. Alexander, E. R. (2008). Between state and market: A third way of planning. International Planning Studies, 13(2), 119–132.
6. Begg, I. (1999). Cities and competitiveness. Urban Studies, 36(5–6), 795–809.
7. Boddy, M. (2002). Linking competitiveness and cohesion. In I. Begg (Ed.), Urban competitiveness: Policies for dynamic cities (pp. 33–54). Bristol: Policy Press.
8. Boddy, M., & Parkinson, M. (Eds.). (2004). City matters. Bristol: Policy Press.
9. Bowman, A. O. M., & Pagano, M. A. (2004). Terra incognita: Vacant land and urban strategies. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
10. Brachman, L. (2004). Turning brownfields into community assets: Barriers to redevelopment. In R. Greenstein & Y. Sungu-Eryilmaz (Eds.), Recycling the city: The use and reuse of urban land (pp. 67–88). Cambridge: Lincoln Institute for Land Policy.
11. Breheny, M. (1997). Urban compaction: Feasible and acceptable. Cities, 14(4), 209–217.
12. Brenner, N. (2006). Global cities, ‘Glocal states’: Global city formation and state territorial restructuring in contemporary Europe. In N. Brenner & R. Keil (Eds.), The global cities reader (pp. 259–267). Oxon: Routledge.
13. Buck, N., Gordon, I., Hall, P., et al. (2002). Working capital: Life and labour in contemporary London. London: Routledge.
14. Camagni, R. (2002). Territorial competitiveness, globalisation and local milieux. European Spatial Research and Policy, 9(2), 63–90.
15. Campbell, H. (2012). Planning ethics and rediscovering the idea of planning. Planning Theory, doi:10.1177/1473095212442159.
16. Castells, M. (1977). The urban question. London: Arnold.
17. Castells, M. (1983). The city and the grassroots. London: Arnold.
18. Christopherson, S., Michie, J., & Tyler, P. (2010). Regional resilience: Theoretical and empirical perspectives. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 3(1), 3–10.
19. Davidoff, P. (1965). Advocacy and pluralism in planning. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 31(4), 331–338.
20. Deas, I., & Giordano, B. (2001). Conceptualising and measuring urban competitiveness in major English cities: An exploratory approach. Environment and Planning A, 33(8), 1411–1429.
21. Delladetsima, P. M. (2006). The emerging property development pattern in Greece and impacts on spatial development. European Urban and Regional Studies, 13(3), 245–278.
22. Dixon, T., Raco, M., Catney, P., & Lerner, D. N. (Eds.). (2007). Sustainable brownfield regeneration: Liveable places from problem spaces. Oxford/Malden/Carlton: Blackwell Publishing.
23. Edwards, M. (2002). Wealth creation and poverty creation: Global-local interactions in the economy of London. City, 6(1), 25–42.
24. Eisenschitz, A., & Gough, J. (1993). The politics of local economic policy: The problems and possibilities of local initiative. London: Macmillan.
25. Enemark, S. (2004, October 26–27). Integrated land-use management for sustainable development. In Proceedings of Special Forum on Building Land Information Policies in the Americas 2004, Aguascalientes.
26. Ewing, R. (1997). Is Los Angeles-style sprawl desirable? Journal of the American Planning Association, 63(1), 107–126.
27. Fainstein, S. S. (2000). New directions in planning theory. Urban Affairs Review, 35(4), 451–478.
28. Fainstein, S. S. (2001). Competitiveness, cohesion and governance: A review of the literature. New Brunswick: Rutgers University. http://cwis.livjm.ac.uk/cities/conference/sf.pdf. Accessed 12 Apr 2006.
29. Fainstein, S. S. (2005). Planning theory and the city. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 25(2), 121–130.
30. Faludi, A. (1987). A decision-centred view of environmental planning. Oxford: Pergamon.
31. Flyvbjerg, B. (1998). Rationality and power: Democracy in practice. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
32. Forester, J. (1999). Dealing with deep value differences. In L. Susskind, S. McKearnan, & J. Thomas-Larmer (Eds.), The consensus building handbook (pp. 463–493). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
33. Friedmann, J. (2008). The uses of planning theory: A bibliographic essay. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 28(2), 247–257.
34. Gordon, I. (2005, October 13–14). Labour market integration to enhance social cohesion. In OECD International Conference “Sustainable cities: Linking competitiveness with social cohesion,” 2005, Montreal.
35. Greenstein, R., & Sungu-Eryilmaz, Y. (Eds.). (2004). Recycling the city: The use and reuse of urban land. Cambridge: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
36. Gunton, T. I., Peter, T., & Day, J. C. (2006). Evaluating collaborative planning: A case study of a land and resource management planning process. Environments, 34(3), 5–12.
37. Habermas, J. (1990). Moral consciousness and communicative action. Cambridge: MIT Press.
38. Habermas, J. (1993). Justification and application: Remarks on discourse ethics. Cambridge: MIT Press.
39. Habermas, J. (2001). On the pragmatics of social interaction. Boston: MIT Press.
40. Harris, N. (2002). Collaborative planning. In P. Allmendinger & M. Tewdwr-Jones (Eds.), Planning futures: New directions for planning theory (pp. 21–43). London: Routledge.
41. Harvey, D. (2005). A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.
42. Healey, P. (1997). Collaborative planning: Shaping places in fragmented societies. London: Macmillan.
43. Healey, P. (2003) Collaborative planning in perspective. Planning Theory, 2(2), 101–123.
44. Heylighen, F. (2002). The science of self-organization and adaptivity. Belgium: Free University of Brussels, Center “Leo Apostel”.
45. Hillier, J. (2002). Direct action and agonism in democratic planning practice. In P. Allmendinger & M. Tewdwr-Jones (Eds.), Planning futures: New directions for planning theory (pp. 110–135). New York: Routledge.
46. Hillier, J. (2003). ‘Agon’izing over consensus: Why Habermasian ideals cannot be ‘real’. Planning Theory, 2(1), 37–59.
47. Holling, C. S. (1992). Cross-scale morphology, geometry and dynamics of ecosystems. Ecological Monographs, 62(4), 447–502.
48. Hudson, R. (2009). Resilient regions in an uncertain world: Wishful thinking or a practical reality? Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 3(1), 11–25.
49. Huggins, R. (2003). Creating a UK competitiveness index: Regional and local benchmarking, debates and surveys. Regional Studies, 37(1), 89–96.
50. Innes, J. E. (1995). Planning theory’s emerging paradigm: Communicative action and interactive practice. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 14(3), 183–189.
51. Innes, J. E., & Booher, D. E. (2010). Planning with complexity: An introduction to collaborative rationality for public policy. Abingdon: Routledge.
52. Jager, J. (2003). Urban land rent theory. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 27(2), 233–249.
53. Jessop, B. (1993). Towards a Schumpeterian workfare state? Preliminary remarks on post-fordist political economy. Studies in Political Economy, 40(1), 7–40.
54. Kresl, P. K. (1995). The determinants of urban competitiveness: A survey. In G. Gappert & P. K. Kresl (Eds.), North American cities and the global economy (pp. 45–68). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
55. Krugman, P. (1996). Making sense of the competitiveness debate. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 12(1), 17–25.
56. Leitner, H., Sheppard, E. S., Sziarto, K., & Maringanyi, A. (2007). Contesting urban futures: Decentering neoliberalism. In H. Leitner, J. Peck, & E. S. Sheppard (Eds.), Contesting neoliberalism: Urban frontiers (pp. 1–26). New York: The Guilford Press.
57. Lever, W. F., & Turok, I. (1999). Competitive cities: Introduction to the review issue. Urban Studies, 36(5–6), 791–793.
58. Ligmann-Zielinska, A., Church, R., & Jankowski, P. (2008). Spatial optimization as a generative technique for sustainable multiobjective land-use allocation. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 22(6), 601–622.
59. Ludwig, D., Walker, B., & Holling, C. S. (1997). Sustainability, stability, and resilience. Conservation Ecology [Online] Url: http://www.consecol.org/vol1/iss1/art7/. (Accessed Date)
60. Malecki, E. J. (2002). Hard and soft networks for urban competitiveness. Urban Studies, 39(5–6), 929–945.
61. Marcuse, P. (1976) Professional ethics and beyond: Values in planning. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 42(3), 264–274.
62. McGuirk, P. (2001). Situating communicative planning theory: Context, power, and knowledge. Environment and Planning A, 33(2), 195–217.
63. Mouffe, C. (1999). Deliberative democracy or agonistic pluralism? Social Research, 66(3), 745–758.
64. Mouffe, C. (2000). The democratic paradox. London: Verso.
65. Murray, D. (2005). A critical analysis of communicative rationality as a theoretical underpinning for collaborative approaches to integrated resource and environmental management. Environments Journal, 33(2), 17–34.
66. Newman, P., & Thornley, A. (1997). Fragmentation and centralisation in the governance of London: Influencing the urban policy and planning agenda. Urban Studies, 34(7), 967–988.
67. Outhwaite, W. (1994). Habermas: A critical introduction. Cambridge: Polity Press.
68. Peck, J., Theodore, N., & Brenner, N. (2009). Neoliberal urbanism: Models, moments, mutations. SAIS Review, 29(1), 49–66.
69. Pickett, S. T. A., Cadenasso, M. L., & Grove, J. M. (2004). Resilient cities: Meaning, models, and metaphor for integrating the ecological, socio-economic and planning realms. Landscape and Urban Planning, 69(1), 369–384.
70. Porter, M. E. (1990). The competitive advantage of nations. New York: Free Press.
71. Purcell, M. (2009). Resisting neoliberalization: Communicative planning or counter-hegemonic movements? Planning Theory, 8(2), 140–165.
72. Raco, M., & Street, E. (2012). Resilience planning, economic change and the politics of post-recession development in London and Hong Kong. URBAN STUDIES, 49(5), 1065–1087.
73. Salet, W., & Guallini, E. (2006). Framing strategic urban projects: Learning from current experiences in European urban regions. Oxon: Routledge.
74. Salet, W., & Majoor, S. (2005). Reshaping the urbanity in Amsterdam region. In W. Salet & S. Majoor (Eds.), Amsterdam Zuidas: European space (pp. 19–24). Rotterdam: 010 Publishers.
75. Shiftel, B. (2000). Planning theory. In R. Palayesed (Ed.), The national AICP examination preparation course guidebook (pp. 4–16). Washington: American Institute Certificate Planners.
76. Shutkin, W. (2004). Once upon a brownfield: Toward a vision of sustainable development in Boston’s South Bay. In R. Greenstein & Y. Sungu-Eryilmaz (Eds.), Recycling the city: The use and reuse of urban land (pp. 219–236). Cambridge: Lincoln Institute for Land Policy.
77. Simmie, J., & Martin, R. (2010). The economic resilience of regions: Towards an evolutionary approach. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 3(1), 27–43.
78. Stallworthy, M. (2002). Sustainability, land use and environment: A legal analysis. London/ Sydney: Cavendish Publishing Limited.
79. Storper, M. (1997). The regional world: Territorial development in a global economy. New York: Guilford Press.
80. Susskind, L., & Cruikshank, J. (1987). Breaking the impasse: Consensual approaches to resolving public disputes. New York: Basic Books.
81. Susskind, L., McKearnen, S., & Thomas-Lamar, J. (Eds.). (1999). The consensus building handbook: A comprehensive guide to reaching agreement. Cambridge: MIT Press.
82. Swyngedouw, E., Moulaert, F., & Rodriguez, A. (2002). Neoliberal urbanization in Europe: Large-scale urban development projects and the new urban policy. Antipode, 34(3), 542–575.
83. Taşan-Kok, T. (2008). Urban regeneration via large-scale public-led strategic projects: Complex but necessary? In M. Sitar (Ed.), Urban futures (pp. 181–194). Maribor: University of Maribor Publications.
84. Tewdwr-Jones, M., & Allmendinger, P. (1998). Deconstructing communicative rationality: A critique of Habermasian collaborative planning. Environment and Planning A, 30(11), 1975–1989.
85. Thornton, G., Franz, M., Edwards, D., Pahlen, G., & Nathanail, P. (2007). The challenge of sustainability: Incentives for brownfield regeneration in Europe. Environmental Science and Policy, 10(2), 116–134.
86. Turok, I. (2004). Cities, regions and competitiveness. Regional Studies, 38(9), 1069–1093.
87. Turok, I. (2005, October 13–14). Social cohesion as a factor of competitiveness and regional growth. In OECD International Conference “Sustainable Cities: Linking Competitiveness with Social Cohesion”, Montreal.
88. UNCED. (1993). Earth summit and Agenda 21: The UN program of action from Rio. New York: United Nations.
89. Walker, B., Holling, C. S., Carpenter, S. R., & Kinzig, A. P. (2004). Resilience, adaptability and transformability in social–ecological systems. Ecology and Society, 9(2), 5. [Online] URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol9/iss2/art5/
90. Walker, B., Salt, D., & Reid, W. (2006). Resilience thinking: Sustaining ecosystems and people in a changing world. Washington, DC: Island Press.
91. Webster, C. J. (2002). Property rights and the public realm: Gates, green-belts and Gemeinshaft. Environment and Planning B, 29(3), 397–412.
92. Wheeler, S. (2007). Planning sustainable and liveable cities. In R. T. LeGates & F. Stout (Eds.), The city reader (pp. 499–509). New York: Routledge.
93. World Bank. (2011). World Bank Development report 2011: Conflict, security and development. New York: World Bank.
94. Yeh, G. A., & Li, X. (Eds.). (2002). Decision support for sustainable land development: A case study in Dongguan. In G. E. Kersten, Z. Mikolajuk & A. G. Yeh (Eds.), Decision support systems for sustainable development: A resource book of method and applications. Dordrecht: Springer.
95. Young, I. (1996). Communication and the other: Beyond deliberative democracy. In S. Benhabib (Ed.), Democracy and difference (pp. 120–136). Princeton: Princeton University Press.
96. Young, I. (1999). Difference as a resource for democratic communication. In J. Bohman & W. Rehg (Eds.), Deliberative democracy (pp. 383–406). Boston: MIT Press.