A critical analysis of communicative rationality as a theoretical underpinning for collaborative approaches to Integrated Resource and Environmental Management

Environments

Volumn 33, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 17-34

  Murray, Dan ^a  

^a GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Collaborative planning; Communicative planning theory; Integrated Resource and Environmental Management

Indexed keywords

CRITICAL ANALYSIS; ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT; PLANNING THEORY;

EID: 33745048354     PISSN: 07116780     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Amstein, S.R. 1969. A Ladder of Citizen Participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners 35(4): 216-224.
2. Bellamy, J. G. McDonald, G. Syme and K. Butterworth. 1999. Evaluating Integrated Resource Management. Society and Natural Resources 12: 337-353.
3. Born, S. and W. Sonzogni. 1995. Integrated Environmental Management: Strengthening the Conceptualization. Environmental Management 19(2): 167-181.
4. Bradshaw, B. 2003. Questioning the credibility and capacity of community-based resource management. The Canadian Geographer 47(2): 137-151.
5. Brown, A. 2002. Collaborative governance versus constitutional politics:decision rules for sustainability from Australia's South East Queensland forest agreement. Environmental Science and Policy 5: 19-32.
6. Buchy, M. and D. Race. 2001. The Twists and Turns of Community Participation in Natural Resource Management in Australia: What is Mi,ssing? Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 44(3), 293-308.
7. Chaskin, R. 2002. Democracy and Bureaucracy in a Community Planning Process. Journal of Planning Education and Research 24: 408-419.
8. Conley, A. and M. Moote. 2003.Evaluating Collaborative Natural Resource Management. Society and Natural Resources 16: 371-386.
9. Dear, M. 1986. Postmodernism and planning. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 4: 367-384.
10. Flyvbjerg, B. 1998. Empowering civil society: Habermas, Foucault and the question of conflict, in Cities for Citizens: planning and the rise of civil society in a global age, M. Douglas and J. Friedmann, eds. Chichester, Sussex, John Wiley.
11. Flyvbjerg, B. 2002. Bringing Power to Planning Research. Journal of Planning Education and Research 21: 353-366.
12. Forester, J. 1985. Practical rationality on planmaking, in Rationality In Planning: Critical Essays On The Role Of Rationality In Urban and Regional Planning, M. Breheny and A. Hooper, eds. London, Pion Limited.
13. Forester, J. 1999. Reflections on the Future Understanding of Planning Practice. International Planning Studies 4(2): 175-193.
14. Frame, T., T. Gunton, and J. Day. 2004. The Role of Collaboration in Environmental Management: An evaluation of Land and Resource Planning in British Columbia. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 47(1): 59-82.
15. Friedmann, J. 1973. Retracking America: a theory of transactive planning. New York, Anchor Press.
16. Gray, B. 1985. Conditions facilitating interorganisational collaboration. Human Relations 38: 911-936.
17. Gunton, T. and J. Day. 2003. The theory and practice of collaborative planning in resource and environmental management. Environments 31(2): 5-20.
18. Habermas, J. 1984. Theorie des kommunikativen Handeins. English (translated by Thomas McCarthy).Boston, Massachusetts, Beacon Press.
19. Habermas, J. 1990. Moralbewusstein und kommunikatives Handeln. English (translated by Christian Lenhardt and Shierry Weber Nicholsen). Cambridge, Massachusetts, MIT Press.
20. Healey, P. 1997. Collaborative planning. Shaping places in fragmented societies. London, Macmillan Press Ltd.
21. Healey, P. 2003. Collaborative Planning in Perspective. Planning Theory 2(2): 101-123.
22. Hillier, J. 2003. 'Agon'izing over Consensus: Why Habermasian Ideals Cannot be Real. Planning Theory 2(l):37-59.
23. Hooper, B., G. McDonald, and B. Mitchell. 1999. Facilitating Integrated Resource and Environmental Management: Australian and Canadian Perspectives. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 42(5):747-766.
24. Innes, J. 1995. Planning Theory's Emerging Paradigm. Joumal of Planning Education and Research 14(3): 128-135.
25. Innes, J. 2004. Consensus Building: Clarifications for the Critics. Planning Theory 3(1):5-20.
26. Innes, J., and D. Booher. 1999. Consensus Building and Complex Adaptive Systems:A Framework for Evaluating Collaborative Planning. Journal of the American Planning Association 65:412-430.
27. Kellert, S., J. Mehta, S. Ebbin, and L. Lichtenfeld. 2000. Community Natural Resource Management: Promise, Rhetoric, and Reality. Society and Natural Resources 13:705-715.
28. Lachapelle, P., S. McCool, and M. Patterson. 2003. Barriers to Effective Natural Resource Planning in a ″Messy″ World. Society and Natural Resources 16: 473-490.
29. Margerum, R. 1997. Integrated Approaches to Environmental Planning and Management. Journal of Planning Literature 11 (4):459-475.
30. Margerum, R. 1999. Integrated Environmental Management: The Foundations for Successful Practice. Environmental Management 24(2): 151-166.
31. Margerum, R. and S. Born. 1995. Integrated Environmental Management: Moving from Theory to Practice. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 38(3):371-391.
32. Margerum, R. and B. Hooper. 2001. Integrating Environmental Management: Improving Implementation Through Leverage Point Mapping. Society and Natural Resources 14: 1-19.
33. McGuirk, P. 2001. Situating communicative planning theory: context, power, and knowledge. Environment and Planning A 33:195-217.
34. Mitchell, B. 1986. The Evolution of Integrated Resource Management, in Integrated Approaches to Resource Planning and Management, Banff Centre Resource Management Program, Banff, Resource Management Programs.
35. Mitchell, B. 1997. Resource and Environmental Management Longman, London.
36. Moore, E. and T. Koontz. 2003. A Typology of Collaborative Watershed Groups: Citizen-Based, Agency-Based, and Mixed Partnerships. Society and Natural Resources 16: 451-460.
37. Moote, M., M. McClaran and D. Chickering. 1997. Theory in practice: Applying Participatory democracy theory to public land planning. Environmental Management 21(6): 877-889.
38. Outhwaite, W. 1994. Habermas: a critical introduction. Cambridge, United Kingdom, Polity.
39. Parkins, J. 2002. Forest Management and Advisory Groups in Alberta: An Empirical Critique of an Emergent Public Sphere. Canadian Journal of Sociology 27(2): 163-184.
40. Paulson, D. 1998. Collaborative Management of Public Rangeland in Wyoming: Lessons in Co-Management. Professional Geographer 50(3): 301-315.
41. Reed, M. 1995. Cooperative management of environmental resources: a case study from northern Ontario, Canada. Economic Geography 71(2): 132-150.
42. Sager, T. 1994. Communicative Planning Theory. Avebury, Aldershot.
43. Selin, S. and D. Chavez. 1995. Developing a Collaborative Model for Environmental Planning and Management. Environmental Management 19 (2): 189-195.
44. Schreiber, E., G. Sabine, A. Bearlin, S. Nicol, and C. Charles. 2004. Adaptive Management: A Synthesis of Current Understanding and Effective Application. Ecological Management and Restoration 5(3): 177-182.
45. Slocombe, S. 1993. Environmental Planning, Ecosystem Science, and Ecosystem Approaches for Integrating Environment and Development.Environmental Management 17(3): 289-303.
46. Tewdwr-Jones, M. and P. Allmendinger. 1998. Deconstructing Communicative Rationality: A Critique of Habermasian Collaborative Planning. Environment and Planning A 30(11): 1975-1989.
47. Yaffee, S. and J. Wondolleck. 2003. Collaborative ecosystem planning processes in the United States: evolution and challenges. Environments 31(2): 59-73.
48. Yaffee, S. 1998. Cooperation: A Strategy for Achieving Stewardship Across Boundaries, in Stewardship Across Boundaries, R. Knight and P. Landres, eds.Washington DC, Island Press.
49. Yosie, T. 2001. Science-based decision making at the crossroads: Information, choices and values. Vital Speeches of the Day 67(7): 216-219.