Reflections on the innovative city: examining three innovative locations in a knowledge bases framework

Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity

Volumn 1, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 1-23

  Inkinen, Tommi ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85102574656     PISSN: None     EISSN: 21998531     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s40852-015-0009-5     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Anttiroiko, A., Science cities. Int J Technol Manag. 28:3–6 (2004), 395–418.
2. Asheim, B., Gertler, M., The geography of innovation: regional innovation systems. Fagerberg, J., Mowery, D., Nelson, R., (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Innovation, 2005, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 291–317.
3. Asheim, B., Coenen, L., Moodysson, J., Vang, J., Constructing knowledge-based regional advantage: Implications for regional innovation policy. Int J Entrep Innov Manag. 7:2–5 (2007), 140–155.
4. Asheim, B., Boschma, R., Cooke, P., Constructing regional advantage: Platform policies based on related variety and differentiated knowledge bases. Reg Stud. 45:7 (2011), 893–904.
5. Capello, R., Spatial transfer of knowledge in high-technology milieu: learning vs. collective learning processes. Reg Stud. 33:4 (1999), 353–365.
6. Chesbrough, H., Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating And Profiting from Technology. 2003, Harvard Business Review Press, Boston, MA.
7. Chesbrough, H., Vanhaverbeke, W., West, J., New Frontiers in Open Innovation. 2014, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
8. Crevoisier, O., The Innovative Milieus Approach: Toward a Territorialized Understanding of the Economy. Econ Geogr. 80:4 (2004), 367–379.
9. Crevoisier, O., Beyond Territorial Innovation Models: The Pertinence of the Territorial Approach. Reg Stud. 48:3 (2014), 551–561.
10. Etzkowitz, H., Klofsten, M., The innovative region: toward a theory of knowledge-based regional development. R&D Manag. 35:3 (2005), 243–255.
11. Fagerberg, J., Verspagen, B., Innovation Studies: The Emerging Structure of a New Scientific Field. Res Policy. 38:2 (2009), 218–233.
12. Freeman, C., Technology Policy and Economic Performance: Lessons from Japan. 1987, Pinter Publishers, London.
13. Geels, F.W., Schot, J., Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways. Res Policy. 36:3 (2007), 399–417.
14. Gertler, M., Buzz without being there? Communities in of practice in context. Amin, A., Roberts, J., (eds.) Community, Economic Creativity and Organization, 2008, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 203–226.
15. Inkinen, T., Urban travel information and wireless technologies in Helsinki. Finland. J Urban Tech. 17:2 (2010), 57–75.
16. Inkinen, T., Kaakinen, I., Economic Geography of Knowledge Intensive Technology Clusters: Lessons from the Helsinki Metropolitan Area. Accepted in Journal of Urban Technology, Routledge, ISSN; 1063-0732 (print), 2015, 1466–1853 (online).
17. Inkinen, T., Vaattovaara, M., Technology and knowledge-based development. Helsinki metropolitan area as a creative region. ACRE report 2.5. 2007, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam.
18. Inkinen, T., Vaattovaara, M., Creative urban region in the Nordic country. Combining tradition with development in Helsinki. Metaxiotis, K., Carrillo, F.J., Yigitcanlar, T., (eds.) Knowledge-Based Development of Cities and Societies: Integrated Multi-Level Approaches, 2010, IGI Global, Hershey, 196–210.
19. Jokela, S., Tourism, Geography and Nation-Building., The Identity-Political Role of Finnish Tourism Images. Department of Geosciences and Geography A 24, 2014, University of Helsinki, Helsinki.
20. Komninos, N., Intelligent Cities. 2002, Spon Press, New York.
21. Lundvall, B.-Å., Product Innovation and User-Producer Interaction. 1985, Aalborg University Press, Aalborg.
22. Lundvall, B.-Å., National Innovation Systems: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning. 1992, Pinter Publishers, London.
23. Lundvall, B.-Å., Maskell, P., Nation states and economic development - From national systems of production to national systems of knowledge creation and learning. Clark, G.L., Feldmann, M.P., Gertler, M.S., (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Economic Geography, 2000, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 353–372.
24. Makkonen, T., Inkinen, T., Innovative capacity, workforce education and economic development in countries and regions of the European Union. Eur Plan Stud. 21:12 (2013), 1958–1976.
25. Makkonen, T., Inkinen, T., Innovation quality in knowledge cities: Empirical evidence of innovation award competitions in Finland. Expert Syst Appl. 41:12 (2014), 5597–5604.
26. Manniche, J., Combinatorial knowledge dynamics: on the usefulness of the differentiated knowledge bases model. Eur Plan Stud. 20:11 (2012), 1823–1841.
27. Martin, R., Sunley, P., Path dependence and regional economic evolution. J Econ Geogr. 6:4 (2006), 395–437.
28. Martin, R., Sunley, P., Complexity thinking and evolutionary economic geography. J Econ Geogr. 7:5 (2007), 573–601.
29. Musterd, S., Bontje, M., Chapain, C., Kovács, Z., Murie, A., Accommodating Creative Knowledge. A Literature Review from a European Perspective. Acre report 1. 2007, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam.
30. Nelson, R.R., (eds.) National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Analysis, 1993, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
31. Nonaka, I., Takeuchi, H., The Knowledge Creating Company. 1995, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
32. Rutten, R., Boekema, F., Beyond the Learning Region: A New Direction for Conceptualizing the Relation between Space and Learning. Eur Plan Stud. 21:5 (2013), 722–734.
33. Simmie, J., Innovative Cities. 2001, Spon Press, New York.
34. Simmie, J., Innovation and Space: a critical review of the literature. Reg Stud. 39:6 (2005), 789–804.
35. Yigitcanlar, T., Lönnqvist, A., Benchmarking knowledge-based urban sdevelopment performance: results from the international comparison of Helsinki. Cities. 31:1 (2013), 357–369.
36. Yigitcanlar, T., Inkinen, T., Makkonen, T., Does Size Matter? Knowledge-Based Development of Second-Order City-Regions in Finland. disP - The Planning Review 51:3 (2015), 56–71.