Split Absolutive

Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory

Volumn 65, Issue , 2006, Pages 143-171

  Legate, Julie Anne ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

Accusative Case; Nominative Case; Object Agreement; Subject Agreement; Transitive Object

Indexed keywords

EID: 85101958613     PISSN: 09244670     EISSN: 22150358     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/1-4020-4188-8_6     Document Type: Chapter

References (79)

1. Anand, Pranav & Andrew Nevins. 2002. ‘The locus of ergative Case assignment: Evidence from scope.’ Paper presented at the Ergativity Workshop, University of Toronto, Canada.
2. Anand, Pranav & Andrew Nevins. (this volume). ‘The locus of ergative Case assignment: Evidence from scope.’
3. Andrews, Avery D. 1976. ‘The VP complement analysis in Modern Icelandic.’ Proceedings of the North East Linguistic Society 6, 1-21.
4. Bailyn, J.F. 1991. ‘The configurationality of case assignment in Russian.’ CornellWorking Papers in Linguistics 9, 56-98.
5. Baker, Mark. 1996. The Polysynthesis Parameter. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
6. Barnes, Michael. 1986. ‘Subject, nominative, and oblique Case in Faroese.’ Scripta Islandica 37, 13-46.
7. Bittner, Maria. 1994. Case, Scope and Binding. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
8. Bittner, Maria & Kenneth Hale. 1996a. ‘The structural determination of case and agreement.’ Linguistic Inquiry 27:1, 1-68.
9. Bittner, Maria & Kenneth Hale. 1996b. ‘Ergativity: towards a theory of a heterogeneous class.’ Linguistic Inquiry 27:4, 531-604.
10. Bobaljik, Jonathan. 1993. ‘On ergativity and ergative unergatives.’ In Colin Phillips, ed., Papers on Case and Agreement II, MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 19, 45-88.
11. Bobaljik, Jonathan & Philip Branigan. 2002. ‘Eccentric agreement and multiple Case checking.’ Paper presented at the Ergativity Workshop, University of Toronto, Canada.
12. Bobaljik, Jonathan & Philip Branigan. (this volume). ‘Eccentric agreement and multiple Case checking.’
13. Bok Bennema, Reineke. 1991. Case and Agreement in Inuit. Dordrecht: Foris.
14. Carnie, Andrew. 2002. ‘Geometric relational hierarchies and Nez Perce Case.’ Paper presented at the Ergativity Workshop, University of Toronto, Canada.
15. Carnie, Andrew and Phillip Cash Cash. (this volume). ‘Tree-geometric relational hierarchies and Nuumiipuuttímt (Nez Perce) Case.’
16. Chomsky, Noam. 1981. Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht:Foris.
17. Chomsky, Noam. 2000. ‘Minimalist inquiries: The framework.’ In Roger Martin, David Michaels and Juan Uriagereka, eds., Step by Step. Essays on Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik, 89-155. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
18. Chomsky, Noam. 2001. ‘Derivation by phase.’ In Michael Kenstowicz, ed., Ken Hale: A Life in Language, 1-52. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
19. Crysmann, Berthold. 2000. ‘On the placement and morphology of Udi subject agreement.’ Paper presented at the 7th International Conference on Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar, Berkeley.
20. Dixon, R.M.W. 1994. Ergativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
21. Fortescue, Michael. 1984. West Greenlandic. London: Croom Helm.
22. Fox, Danny. 1999. ‘Reconstruction, binding theory, and the interpretation of chains.’ Linguistic Inquiry 30:2, 157-196.
23. Granites, Robin Japanangka, Kenneth L. Hale, & David Odling-Smee. 1976. Survey of Warlpiri Grammar. Ms., MIT.
24. Hale, Kenneth L. 1982. ‘Some essential features of Warlpiri verbal clauses.’ In Stephen M. Swartz, ed., Papers in Warlpiri grammar: In Memory of Lothar Jagst (= Work Papers of SIL-AAB, Series A Volume 6 .), 217-315. Berrimah, N.T.: SIL-AAB.
25. Hale, Kenneth L. 1983. ‘Warlpiri and the grammar of non-configurational languages.’ Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 1.1, 5-47.
26. Hale, Kenneth L. 1994. ‘Core structures and adjunctions in Warlpiri syntax.’ In Novert Corver & Henk van Riemsdijk, eds., Studies in Scrambling. Movement and Non-Movement Approaches to Free Word-Order Phenomen., 185-219. Hawthorne, NY: Walter de Gruyer.
27. Hale, Kenneth L. & Samuel Jay Keyser. 1993. ‘On argument structure and the lexical expression of syntactic relations.’ In Kenneth L Hale & Samuel Jay Keyser, eds., The View from Building 20: Essays in linguistics in Honor of Sylvain Bromberger, 53-109. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
28. Hale, Kenneth L, Mary Laughren, & Jane Simpson. 1995. ‘Warlpiri syntax.’ In Joachim Jacobs, Armin von Stechow, Wolfgang Sternefeld & Theo Vennemann, eds., Syntax. Ein internationales Handbuch zeitgenssischer Forschung An International Handbook of Contemporary Research, 1430-51. Berlin New York: Walter de Gruyter.
29. Halle, Morris & Alec Marantz. 1993. ‘Distributed Morphology and the pieces of inflection.’ In Kenneth Hale & S. Jay Keyser, eds., The View from Building 20, 111-176. Cambridge, MA:MIT Press.
30. Harris, A. 1984. ‘Case marking, verb agreement, and inversion in Udi.’ In D.M. Perlmutter & C.G. Rosen, eds., Studies in Relational Grammar 2, 243-258. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
31. Holmberg, Anders & Thorbj¨org Hr´oarsd´ottir. 2003. ‘Agreement and movement in Icelandic raising constructions.’ Lingua 113, 997-1019.
32. Jelinek, Eloise. 1984. ‘Empty categories, case, and configurationality.’ Natural language and Linguistic Theory 2, 39-76.
33. Jelinek, Eloise. 1993. ‘Ergative splits and argument type.’ In J. Bobaljik and C. Phillips, eds., Papers on Case and Agreement, MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, 18, 15-42.
34. Johns, Alana. 1992. ‘Deriving ergativity.’ Linguistic Inquiry 23, 57-88.
35. Johns, Alana. (this volume). ‘Ergativity and Change in Inuktitut. ’
36. Johns, Alana & Carolyn Smallwood. 1999. ‘On (non-)finiteness in Inuktitut.’ University of Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics 17.
37. Kibrik, Aleksandr. 1979. ‘Canonical ergativity and Daghestan languages.’ In F. Plank, ed., Ergativity, 61-77. London: Academic Press.
38. Laka, Itziar. 1993. ‘Unergatives that assign ergative, unaccusatives that assign accusative.’ In J.D.Bobaljik & C. Phillips, eds., Papers on Case and Agreement, MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 18, 149-172.
39. Laka, Itziar. 2002. ‘Deriving split ergativity in the progressive: The Case of Basque.’ Paper presented at the Ergativity Workshop, University of Toronto, Canada.
40. Laka, Itziar. (this volume). ‘Deriving split ergativity in the progressive: The Case of Basque.’
41. Laughren, Mary. 1985. Warlpiri reflexives, ‘inherent’ reflexives and grammatical relations. Ms., MIT.
42. Laughren, Mary. 1989. ‘The configurationality parameter and Warlpiri.’ In Laci K. Maracz & Pieter Muysken, eds., Configurationality: the Typology of Asymmetries, 319-353. Dordrecht: Foris.
43. Laughren, Mary. 1991. ‘Grammatical relations and binding in Warlpiri.’ Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Australian Linguistic Society, University of Queensland, Australia.
44. Lebeaux, David. 1995. ‘Where does binding theory apply?’ Maryland Working Papers in Linguistics, Vol 3, 63-88. College Park, MD: University of Maryland.
45. Legate, Julie Anne. 2002a. ‘Split absolutive.’ Paper presented at The Ergativity Workshop, University of Toronto, Canada.
46. Legate, Julie Anne. 2002b. Warlpiri: Theoretical Implications. Doctoral dissertation, MIT.
47. Legate, Julie Anne. 2004. Second Position Clitic Placement is Morpho-Syntactic, Not Phonological. Ms., Yale University.
48. Lehmann, Thomas. 1993. A Grammar of Modern Tamil. Pondicherry: Pondicherry Institute of Linguistics and Culture.
49. Levin, B. 1983. On the Nature of Ergativity. Doctoral dissertation, MIT.
50. Levin, B. 1993. English Verb Classes and Alternations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
51. Levin, B. & D. Massam. 1985. ‘Surface ergativity: Case/theta relations reexamined.’ Proceedings of NELS 15, 286-301.
52. Mahajan, Anoop. 1990. The A/A-bar Distinction and Movement Theory. Doctoral dissertation, MIT.
53. Marantz, Alec. 1984. On the Nature of Grammatical Relations. Cambridge, MA:MIT Press.
54. Marantz, Alec. 1991. ‘Case and licensing.’ In Germán F. Westphal, Benjamin Ao, & Hee-Rahk Chae, eds., Proceedings of the Eighth Eastern States Conference on Linguistics, 234-253.
55. Massam, Diane. 2001. ‘Pseudo noun incorporation in Niuean.’ Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 19, 153-197.
56. McCloskey, James. 1997. ‘Subjects and subject positions.’ In Liliane Haegeman, ed., Elements of Grammar. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
57. Murasugi, Kumiko G. 1992. Crossing and Nested Paths: NP Movement in Accusative and Ergative Languages. Doctoral dissertation, MIT.
58. Nash, David. 1986. Topics in Warlpiri Grammar. New York, London: Garland.
59. Pesetsky, David & Esther Torrego. 2001. ‘T-to-C movement: Causes and consequences.’ In Michael Kenstowicz, ed., Ken Hale: A Life in Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
60. Phillips, C. 1993. ‘Conditions on agreement in Yimas.’ In J. Bobaljik and C. Phillips, eds., Papers on Case and Agreement, MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, 18, 173-213.
61. Rude, Noel. 1988. ‘Ergative, passive, and antipassive in Nez Perce.’ In M. Shibatani, ed., Passive and Voice, 547-560. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
62. Sauerland, Uli. 1995. The Late Insertion of Germanic Inflection. Ms., MIT.
63. Saito, Mamoru. 1992. ‘Long distance scrambling in Japanese.’ Journal of East Asian Linguistics 1, 69-118.
64. Schebeck, Bernhard. 1976. ‘Thangu and Atjnjamathanha.’ In R.M.W. Dixon, ed., Grammatical Categories in Australian Languages, 516-550. New Jersey: Humanities Press.
65. Sigurdsson, Halldόr Ármann. 1989. Verbal Syntax and Case in Icelandic. Doctoral dissertation, Lund University.
66. Sigurdsson, Halldόr Ármann. 2002. ‘To be an Oblique Subject: Russian vs. Icelandic.’ Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 20, 691-724.
67. Simpson, Jane. 1991. Warlpiri Morpho-Syntax. A Lexicalist Approach. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
68. Svenonius, Peter. 2001. ‘Case and event structure.’ ZASPIL 26.
69. Thráinsson, Höskuldur. 1979. On Complementation in Icelandic. New York: Garland.
70. Ura, Hiroyuki. 1996. Multiple Feature Checking: A Theory of Grammatical Function Splitting. Doctoral dissertation, MIT.
71. Ura, Hiroyuki. 2001. ‘Case.’ In Mark Baltin and Chris Collins, eds., The Handbook of Contemporary Syntactic Theory, 334-373. Oxford: Blackwell.
72. Ura, Hiroyuki. 2002. ‘A parametric syntax of aspectually conditioned split-ergativity.’ Paper presented at the Ergativity Workshop, University of Toronto, Canada.
73. Ura, Hiroyuki. (this volume). ‘A parametric syntax of aspectually conditioned split-ergativity.’
74. Warlpiri Dictionary Project. 1993. ‘Warlpiri Dictionary’. Ongoing work with numerous contributers. Machine-readable data files, deposited at ASEDA, AIATSIS.
75. Watters, David E. 1973. ‘Clause patterns in Kham.’ In Austin Hale, ed., Clause, Sentence, and Discourse Patterns in Selected Languages of Nepal, 39-202. Norman: Summer Institute of Linguistics of the University of Oklahoma.
76. Woolford, Ellen. 2003. ‘Nominative objects and Case locality.’ To appear in FASL 11, Ann Arbor: Michigan Slavic Publications.
77. Woolford, Ellen. 1999. ‘Ergative agreement systems.’ Paper presented at Maryland Mayfest, University of Maryland.
78. Woolford, Ellen. 1997. ‘Four-way case systems: Ergative, nominative, objective, and accusative.’ Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 15, 181-227.
79. Zaenen, Annie, Joan Maling & Höskuldur Thráinsson. 1985. ‘Case and grammatical functions: the Icelandic passive.’ Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 3, 441-483.