Age and scientific genius

The Wiley Handbook of Genius

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 422-450

  Jones, Benjamin F ^a   Reedy, E J ^a   Weinberg, Bruce A ^b,c  

^a NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c National Bureau of Economic Research   (Germany)

Author keywords

Aging; Creativity; Innovation; Life cycle; Science; Scientific revolutions

Indexed keywords

EID: 85100649026     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1002/9781118367377.ch20     Document Type: Chapter

References (64)

1. Adams, C. W. (1946). The age at which scientists do their best work. Isis, 166-169.
2. Arrow, K. J. (1962). The economic implications of learning by doing. The Review of Economic Studies, 29(3), 155-173.
3. Bayer, A. E., & Dutton, J. E. (1977). Career age and research-professional activities of academic scientists: Tests of alternative nonlinear models and some implications for higher education faculty policies. The Journal of Higher Education, 48(3), 259-282.
4. Beard, G. M. (1874). Legal responsibility in old age: based on researches into the relation of age to work (Reprinted in The “fixed period” controversy: Prelude to ageism, by G. J. Gruman, Ed., 1979, New York, NY: Arno Press)
5. Becker, G. S. (1964). Human capital: a theoretical analysis with special reference to education. New York, NY: National Bureau for Economic Research, Columbia University Press.
6. Becker, H. S. (1982). Art worlds. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
7. Ben-Porath, Y. (1967). The production of human capital and the life cycle of earnings. The Journal of Political Economy, 75(4), 352-365.
8. Blackburn, R. T., Behymer, C. E., & Hall, D. E. (1978). Research note: Correlates of faculty publications. Sociology of Education, 51(2), 132-141.
9. Cassidy, D. C. (1992). Uncertainty: The life and times of Werner Heisenberg. New York, NY: Freeman.
10. Currie, J., & Madrian, B. C. (1999). Health, health insurance and the labor market. Handbook of Labor Economics, 3, 3309-3416.
11. Deary, I. J., Corley, J., Gow, A. J., Harris, S. E., Houlihan, L. M., Marioni, R. E.,… Starr, J. M. (2009). Age-associated cognitive decline. British Medical Bulletin, 92(1), 135-152.
12. Dennis, W. (1956). Age and productivity among scientists. Science, 123, 724-725.
13. Diamond Jr., A. M. (1980). Age and the acceptance of cliometrics. Journal of Economic History, 40(4), 838-841.
14. Diamond, A. M. (1986). The life-cycle research productivity of mathematicians and scientists. Journal of Gerontology, 41(4), 520-525.
15. Dietrich, A., & Srinivasan, N. (2007). The optimal age to start a revolution. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 41(1), 54-74.
16. Ericsson, K. A., & Lehmann, A. C. (1996). Expert and exceptional performance: Evidence of maximal adaptation to task constraints. Annual Review of Psychology, 47, 273-305.
17. Feist, G. J. (2006). The development of scientific talent in Westinghouse finalists and members of the National Academy of Sciences. Journal of Adult Development, 13(1), 23-35.
18. Freud, S. (1929). Civilization and its discontents. London, UK: Hogarth Press.
19. Galenson, D. W. (2001). Painting outside the lines. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
20. Galenson, D. W. (2005). One hit wonders: why some of the most important works of modern art are not by important artists. Historical Methods, 38(3), 101-117.
21. Galenson, D. W., & Weinberg, B. A. (2000). Age and the quality of work: the case of modern American painters. Journal of Political Economy, 108(4), 761-777.
22. Galenson, D. W., & Weinberg, B. A. (2001). Creating modern art: The changing careers of painters in France from impressionism to cubism. The American Economic Review, 91(4), 1063-1071.
23. Hull, D. L., Tessner, P. D., & Diamond, A. M. (1978). Planck’s principle. Science, 202(717), 295.
24. Jones, B. F. (2003). Essays on innovation, leadership, and growth (Ph.D. thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology).
25. Jones, B. F. (2009). The burden of knowledge and the “death of the Renaissance Man”: Is innovation getting harder? The Review of Economic Studies, 76(1), 283-317.
26. Jones, B. F. (2010). Age and great invention. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 92(1), 1-14.
27. Jones, B. F. (2011). As science evolves, how can science policy? Innovation Policy and the Economy, 11, 103-131.
28. Jones, B. F., & Weinberg, B. A. (2011). Age dynamics in scientific creativity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(47), 18910-18914.
29. Jones, C. I., & Romer, P. M. (2010). The New Kaldor Facts: Ideas, institutions, population, and human capital. American Economics Journal: Macroeconomics, 2(1), 224-245.
30. Kanazawa, S. (2003). Why productivity fades with age: The crime-genius connection. Journal of Research in Personality, 37(4), 257-272.
31. Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
32. Lehman, H. C. (1953). Age and achievement. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
33. Lehman, H. C. (1966). The psychologist’s most creative years. The American Psychologist, 21(4), 363.
34. Levin, S. G., & Stephan, P. E. (1991). Research productivity over the life cycle: Evidence for academic scientists. The American Economic Review, 81(1), 114-132.
35. Lyons, J. (1968). Chronological age, professional age, and eminence in psychology. The American Psychologist, 23(5), 371.
36. Matthews, K. R., Calhoun, K. M., Lo, N., & Ho, V. (2011). The aging of biomedical research in the United States. PLoS One, 6(12), e29738.
37. McDowell, J. M. (1982). Obsolescence of knowledge and career publication profiles: Some evidence of differences among fields in costs of interrupted careers. The American Economic Review, 72(4), 752-768.
38. Merton, R. K. (1968). The Matthew effect in science. Science, 159(January 5), 56-63.
39. Messeri, P. (1988). Age differences in the reception of new scientific theories: The case of plate tectonics theory. Social Studies of Science, 18(1), 91-112.
40. Moulin, L. (1955). The Nobel Prizes for the Sciences from 1901-1950-An essay in sociological analysis. The British Journal of Sociology, 6(3), 246-263.
41. National Research Council. (1990). On time to the doctorate: A study of the lengthening time to completion for doctorates in science and engineering. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
42. Oster, S. M., & Hamermesh, D. S. (1998). Aging and productivity among economists. Review of Economics and Statistics, 80(1), 154-156.
43. Pelz, D., & Andrews, F. M. (1966). Scientists in organizations: Productive climates for research and development. New York, NY: Wiley.
44. Raskin, E. (1936). Comparison of scientific and literary ability: a biographical study of eminent scientists and men of letters of the nineteenth century. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 31(1), 20-35.
45. Reese, H. W., Lee, L. J., Cohen, S. H., & Puckett Jr., J. M. (2001). Effects of intellectual variables, age, and gender on divergent thinking in adulthood. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 25(6), 491-500.
46. Roe, A. (1972). Patterns in productivity of scientists. Science, 176(4037), 940-941.
47. Simonton, D. K. (1988). Scientific genius: A psychology of science. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
48. Simonton, D. K. (1991). Career landmarks in science: Individual differences and interdisciplinary contrasts. Developmental Psychology, 27(1), 119-130.
49. Simonton, D. K. (1997). Creative productivity: A predictive and explanatory model of career trajectories and landmarks. Psychological Review 104(1), 66-89.
50. Simonton, D. K. (2007). Creative life cycles in literature; Poets versus novelists or conceptualists versus experimentalists? Psychology of Ethics, Creativity, and the Arts, 1(3), 133-139.
51. Simonton, D. K. (2009). Varieties of (scientific) creativity: a hierarchical model of domainspecific disposition, development, and achievement. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4(5), 441-452.
52. Stephan, P. E., & Levin, S. G. (1993). Age and the Nobel Prize revisited. Scientometrics, 28(3), 387-399.
53. Tilghman, S. (chair), et al. (1998). Trends in the early careers of life sciences. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
54. Usher, A. P. (1954). A history of mechanical invention. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
55. Van Dalen, H. (1999). The golden age of Nobel economists. The American Economist, 43(2), 17-35.
56. Weinberg, B. A. (2006). Which labor economists invested in human capital? Geography, vintage, and participation in scientific revolutions (Ohio State University mimeo. Working Paper).
57. Weinberg, B. A., & Galenson, D. W. (2005). Creative careers: The life cycles of Nobel laureates in economics (National Bureau of Economic Research. Working Paper No. w11799).
58. Weitzman, M. L. (1998). Recombinant growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 113, 331-360.
59. Wray, K. B. (2004). An examination of the contributions of young scientists in new fields. Scientometrics, 61(1), 117-128.
60. Wray, K. B. (2009). Did professionalization afford better opportunities for young scientists? Scientometrics, 81(3), 757-764.
61. Zhao, H., & Jiang, G. (1985). Shifting of world’s scientific center and scientists’ social ages. Scientometrics, 8(1), 59-80.
62. Zuckerman, H. (1977). Scientific elite: Nobel laureates in the United States. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
63. Zuckerman, H., & Merton, R. (1973). Age, aging, and age structure in science. In R. Merton (Ed.), The sociology of science (pp. 497-559). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
64. Zusne, L. (1976). Age and achievement in psychology: The harmonic mean as a model. American Psychologist, 31(11), 805.