Citation Analysis of Chemistry Doctoral Dissertations: An Ohio State University Case Study

Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship

Volumn 2001, Issue 32, 2001, Pages

  Gooden, Angela M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85098221718     PISSN: None     EISSN: 10921206     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.29173/istl1865     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Barry, C.A. 1997. Information skills for an electronic world: training doctoral research students. Journal of Information Science 23(3):225-238.
2. Boyer, C. J. 1972. The Ph.D. dissertation; an analysis of the doctoral dissertation as an information source. [Austin, Tex.]
3. Buchanan, A. L. and Herubel, J.P.V.M. 1994. Profiling PhD dissertation bibliographies: serials and collection development in political science. Behavioral & Social Sciences Librarian 13(1):1-10.
4. Buttlar, L. 1999. Information sources in library and information science doctoral research. Library & Information Science Research 21(2):227-245.
5. Chambers, G.R. and Healey, J.S. 1973. Journal citations in master's theses: one measurement of a journal collection. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 24 (September):397-401.
6. Diadoto, V. 1994. Dictionary of bibliometrics. Binghamton, NY: Haworth Press.
7. Edwards, S. 1999. Citation analysis as a collection development tool: a bibliometric study of polymer science theses and dissertations. Serials Review 25(1):11-20.
8. Gross, P.L.K. and Gross, E.M. 1927. College libraries and chemical education. Science 66 (October):385-389.
9. Henkle, Herman H. 1938. The periodical literature of biochemistry. Medical Library Association Bulletin 27, 2 (December):139-147.
10. Hurd, Julie M. 1992. Interdisciplinary research in the sciences: implications for library organization. College & Research Libraries 53:283-97.
11. Lal, A and Panda, K.C. 1996. Research in plant pathology: a bibliometric analysis. Library Science 33(3):135-147.
12. Lee, Wade M. 2000. Publication trends of doctoral students in three fields from 1965-1995. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 51(2):139-44.
13. McCain, K. W. and Bobick, J. E. B. 1981. Patterns of journal use in a department library: a citation analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 32(4):257-267.
14. Mercer, Linda S. 2000. Measuring the use and value of electronic journals and books. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship. [Online.] Available: http://www.istl.org/00-winter/article1.html [May 24, 2001].
15. Rusch-Feja, Diann and Siebeky, Uta. 1999. Evaluation of usage and acceptance of electronic journals. D-Lib Magazine. [Online.] Available: http://www.dlib.org/dlib/october99/rusch-feja/10rusch-feja-full-report.html [May 24, 2001].
16. Strohl, B. 1999. Collection evaluation techniques: a short, selective, practical, current, annotated bibliography, 1990-1998. Chicago: Reference and User Services Association, American Library Association.
17. Walcott, R. 1991. Characteristics of citations in geoscience doctoral dissertations accepted at United States academic institutions 1981-1985. Science & Technology Libraries 12(2):5-16.
18. Walcott, R. 1994a. Local citation studies--a shortcut to local knowledge. Science & Technology Libraries 14(3):1-14.
19. Walcott, R. 1994b. Serials cited by Marine Sciences Research Center faculty, University at Stony Brook, 1986-1991. Science & Technology Libraries 14(3):15-33.
20. Youngen, G.K. 1998. Citation patterns to electronic preprints in the astronomy and astrophysics literature. Library and Information Services in Astronomy III. [Online]. Available: http://www.stsci.edu/stsci/meetings/lisa3/youngeng.html [March 8, 2001]