Governing Biobanks Through a European Infrastructure: Ethical, Legal and Social Implications

International Library of Ethics, Law and Technology

Volumn 14, Issue , 2015, Pages 139-151

  Rial Sebbag, Emmanuelle ^a   Cambon Thomsen, Anne ^b  

^a UNIVERSITÉ TOULOUSE JEAN JAURÈS   (France)

^b INSERM   (France)

Author keywords

Broad Consent; External Governance; Human Biological Sample; Preparatory Phase; Specific Consent

Indexed keywords

EID: 85098086144     PISSN: 18750044     EISSN: 18750036     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-017-9573-9_11     Document Type: Chapter

References (19)

1. Avard, D. 2009. Public health genomics (PHG) and public participation: points to consider. Journal of Public Deliberation 5(1), Article 7. http://services.bepress.com/jpd/vol5/iss1/art7.
2. Bovenberg, J. 2007. Legal pathways for cross-border research: building a legal platform for biomedical academia. European Journal of Human Genetics 15: 522–524. doi:10.1038/sj.ejhg.5 201792;publishedonline28.
3. Cambon-Thomsen, A. 2003. Assessing the impact of biobanks. Nature Genetics (Correspondence) 34(1): 25–26.
4. Chadwick, R., and H. Strange. 2009. Harmonisation and standardisation in ethics and governance: conceptual and practical challenges In The governance of genetic information: who decides? eds. H. Widdows, and C. Mullen, 201–213. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5. Fleischacker, S. 1999. From cultural diversity to universal ethics: three models. Cultural Dynamics 11: 105–128.
6. Gottweis, H., and A. Petersen eds. 2008. Biobanks: governance in comparative perspective. London: Routledge.
7. Gottweis, H., and G. Lauss. 2010. Biobank governance in the post-genomic age. Personalized Medicine 7(2): 187–195.
8. Hennink, M. 2007. International focus group research: a handbook for the health and social sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
9. Hoeyer, K., et al. 2004. Informed consent and biobanks: a population-based study of attitudes towards tissue donation for genetic research. Scand Journal Public Health 32(3): 224–229.
10. Kauffmann, F., and A. Cambon-Thomsen. 2008. Tracing biological collections: between books and clinicaltrials. JAMA 299(19): 2316–2318.
11. Kettis-Lindblad, A., et al. 2007a. Genetic research and donation of tissue samples to biobanks. What do potential sample donors in the Swedish general public think? The European Journals of Public Health 16(4): 433–440.
12. Kettis-Lindblad, A., et al. 2007b. Perceptions of potential donors in the Swedish public towards information and consent procedures in relation to use of human tissue samples in biobanks: a population-based study. Scand Journal Public Health 35(2): 148–156.
13. Pardo, R., et al. 2002. Attitudes toward biotechnology in the European Union. Journal of Biotechnology 98(1): 9–24.
14. Rial-Sebbag, E., et al. 2009a. The human sample exchange regulation navigator (hSERN): a tool to help researchers with the legal requirements for the exchange of biological material. In Principles and practice in biobank governance, eds. Jane Kaye, and Mark Stranger, 191– 200. Farnham: Ashgate.
15. Rial-Sebbag, E., et al. 2009b. From medical biobanks to research tools: re-use of samples, governance and human rights. In New challenges for biobanks: ethics, law and governance, eds. Kris Dierickx, and Pascal Borry, 87–94. Cambridge: Intersentia.
16. Tupasela, A., et al. 2010. Attitudes towards biomedical use of tissue sample collections, consent, and biobanks among Finns. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health 38(1): 46–52.
17. UK Biobank. 2008. Public attitudes to biobanks and related ethics and governance issues.
18. Wallace, S., et al. 2008. Ethics and policymaking core, Centre de recherche en droit public (CRDP), Université de Montréal. Available on line at http://www.p3gobservatory.org/repository/ethics.htm.
19. Yuille, M., et al. 2008. Biobanking for Europe. Brief Bioinform 9(1): 14–24.