Compatible contradictions: Eligion and the naturalization of assisted reproduction

Philosophy and Medicine

Volumn 98, Issue , 2008, Pages 15-85

  Traina, Cristina ^a   Georges, Eugenia ^b   Inhorn, Marcia ^c,d   Kahn, Susan ^e   Ryan, Maura A ^f  

^a NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b RICE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^d Center for Middle Eastern and North African Studies   (United States)

^e HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^f UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME   (United States)

Author keywords

Artificial Insemination; Assist Reproduction; Infertile Couple; Natural Family; Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis

Indexed keywords

EID: 85094897167     PISSN: 03767418     EISSN: 22150080     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4020-6923-9_2     Document Type: Chapter

References (126)

1. Allahbadia, Gautam N. (2002). “The 50 Million Missing Women,” Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics 19(9), 411–416.
2. Barris, Sara, and Joel Comet (1994). “Infertility: Issues from the Heart,” in Richard Grazi (ed.), Be Fruitful and Multiply. Spring Valley, NY: Genesis Jerusalem Press, 19–37.
3. Bauer, Renée (2006). “Patrilineal Descent’ and Same-Sex Parents: New Definitions of Identity,” The Reconstructionist 70.02(Spring), 26–33.
4. Becker, Gay (2000). The Elusive Embryo: How Women and Men Approach New Reproductive Technologies. Ewing, NJ: University of California Press.
5. Bharadwaj, Aditya (2000). “How Some Indian Baby Makers Are Made: Media Narratives and Assisted Conception in India,” Anthropology and Medicine 7(1), 63–78.
6. Bharadwaj, Aditya (2003). “Why Adoption Is Not an Option in India: The Visibility of Infertility, the Secrecy of Donor Insemination, and Other Cultural Complexities,” Social Science and Medicine 56, 1867–1880.
7. Bharadwaj, Aditya (2006). “Sacred Conceptions: Clinical Theodicies, Uncertain Science, and Technologies of Procreation in India,” Culture, Medicine, and Society 30, 451–465.
8. Bick, Ezra (1997). “Ovum Donations: A Rabbinic Conceptual Model of Maternity,” in Emanuel Feldman and Joel B. Wolowelsky (eds.), Jewish Law and the New Reproductive Technologies. Hoboken, NJ: Ktav Publishing House, 83–105.
9. Bleich, J. David (1997a). “Sperm Banking in Anticipation of Infertility,” in Emanuel Feldman and Joel B. Wolowelsky (eds.), Jewish Law and the New Reproductive Technologies. Hoboken, NJ: Ktav Publishing House, 139–154.
10. Bleich, J. David (1997b). “In Vitro Fertilization: Questions of Maternal Identity and Conversion,” in Emanuel Feldman and Joel B. Wolowelsky (eds.), Jewish Law and the New Reproductive Technologies. Hoboken, NJ: Ktav Publishing House, 46–82.
11. Bleich, J. David (1997c). “Maternal Identity Revisited,” in Emanuel Feldman and Joel B. Wolowelsky (eds.), Jewish Law and the New Reproductive Technologies. Hoboken, NJ: Ktav Publishing House, 106–114.
12. Breck, John (1998). The Sacred Gift of Life: Orthodox Christianity and Bioethics. Crestwood, NY: St. Vladimir’s Seminary Press.
13. Breck, John (2003). God with Us: Critical Issues in Life and Faith. Crestwood, NY: St. Vladimir’s Seminary Press.
14. Brody, Baruch (1990). “Current Religious Perspectives on the New Reproductive Technologies,” in Dianne M. Bartels, Reinhard Priester, Dorothy E. Vawter, and Arthur L. Caplan (eds.), Beyond Baby M: Ethical Issues in New Reproductive Technologies. Clifton, NJ: Humana Press, 45–63.
15. Bryan, Elizabeth, and Jane Denton (2001). “Reproductive Health Care Policies Around the World: The Work of the Multiple Births Foundation,” Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics 18(1), 8–10.
16. Bryld, Mette (2001). “The Infertility Clinic and the Birth of the Lesbian: The Political Debate on Assisted Reproduction in Denmark,” The European Journal of Women’s Studies 8(3), 299–312.
17. Cahill, Lisa Sowle (1988). “Women, Marriage, Parenthood: What Are Their ‘Natures?’,” Logos 9, 11–35.
18. Cahill, Lisa Sowle (1996). Sex, Gender, and Christian Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
19. Cahill, Lisa Sowle (2000). Family: A Christian Social Perspective. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress.
20. Campbell, Courtney (1997). “Cloning Human Beings: Religious Perspectives on Human Cloning,” in Cloning Human Beings, Vol. 2. Rockville, MD: National Bioethics Advisory Commission, D1-D66. http://www.georgetown.edu/research/nrcbl/nbac/pubs/cloning2/cc4.pdf (accessed July 8, 2006).
21. Chakravarty, B.N. (2001). “Legislation and Regulations Regarding the Practice of Assisted Reproduction in India,” JARG 18(1), 11–14.
22. Chan, Cecelia L.W., Paul S.F. Yip, Ernest H.Y. Ng, P.C. Ho, Celia H.Y. Chan, and Jade S.K. Au (2002). “Gender Selection in China: Its Meanings and Implications,” Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics 19(9), 426–430.
23. Charlesworth, Max (1990). “Human Genome Analysis and the Concept of Human Nature,” Human Genetic Information: Science, Law and Ethics, Ciba Foundation Symposium 149 (article 180–189, discussion 189–198). New York: Wiley, 180–198.
24. Chrysostom, St. John (1997). “Sermon on Marriage,” in Catharine P. Roth and David Anderson (trans.), On Marriage and Family Life. Crestwood, NY: St. Vladimir’s Seminary Press.
25. Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith (1987). Instruction on Respect for Human Life in Its Origin and on the Dignity of Procreation: Replies to Certain Questions of the Day [Donum Vitae]. http: www.vatican.va/roman_curia/congragtions/cfaith/documents/rc_con_cfaith_doc_198.
26. Crawford, S. Cromwell (2003). Hindu Bioethics for the Twenty-First Century. Albany, NY: SUNY.
27. Croll, Elizabeth J. (2000). Endangered Daughters: Discrimination and Development in Asia. New York: Routledge.
28. Dubner, Stephen J., and Steven D. Leavitt (2005). “The Search for 100 Million Missing Women: A Detective Story,” Slate, May 24. http://www.slate.com/id/2119402/
29. Fagley, Richard M. (1965). “Doctrines and Attitudes of Major Religions in Regard to Fertility.” The Ecumenical Review 17, 332–344.
30. Farley, Margaret A. (1983). “An Ethic for Same-Sex Relations” in Robert Nugent (ed.), A Challenge to Love. New York: Crossroad Publishing, 93–106.
31. Franklin, Sarah (1991). “Fetal Fascinations: New Dimensions to the Medical-Scientific Construction of Fetal Personhood,” in Sarah Franklin, Celia Lury, and Jack Stacy (eds.), OffCentre: Feminism and Cultural Studies. New York: Routledge, 190–205.
32. Franklin, Sarah (1997). Embodied Progress: A Cultural Account of Assisted Reproduction. London: Routledge.
33. Franklin, Sarah (1998). “Making Miracles: Scientific Progress and the Facts of Life,” in Sarah Franklin and Helena Ragoné (eds.), Reproducing Reproduction: Kinship, Power, and Technological Innovation. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press, 102–117.
34. Franklin, Sarah (2006). “Origin Stories Revisited: IVF as an Anthropological Project,” Culture, Medicine and Psychiatry 30, 547–555.
35. Georges, Eugenia (1996). “Abortion Policy and Practice in Greece,” Social Science and Medicine 42(2), 509–519.
36. Greil, Arthur (1989). “The Religious Response to Reproductive Technology,” Christian Century January 4–11, 11–14.
37. Grenz, Stanley J. (1990). Sexual Ethics: An Evangelical Perspective. Louisville, KY: Westminster/ John Knox.
38. Gross, Rita M. (1997). “Buddhist Resources for Issues of Population, Consumption, and the Environment,” in Mary Evelyn Tucker and Duncan Ryuken Williams (eds.), Buddhism and Ecology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 291–311.
39. Handwerker, Lisa (1998). “The Consequences of Modernity for Childless Women in China: Medicalization and Resistance,” in Margaret Lock and Patricia A. Kaufert (eds.), Pragmatic Women and Body Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press, 178–205.
40. Handwerker, Lisa (2002). “The Politics of Making Modern Babies in China: Reproductive Technologies and the ‘New’ Eugenics,” in Marcia C. Inhorn and Frank van Balen (eds.), Infertility Around the Globe: New Thinking on Childlessness, Gender, and Reproductive Technologies. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 298–314.
41. Hanson, Charles, Lars Hamberger, and Per Olaf Janson (2002). “Is Any Form of Gender Selection Ethical?,” Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics 19(9), 431–432.
42. Harakas, Stanley (1980). “For the Health of Body and Soul: An Eastern Orthodox Introduction to Bioethics.” http://www.goarch.org/en/ourfaith/articles/article8076.asp (accessed July 8, 2008).
43. Harris, Ian (2001). “Magician as Environmentalist: Fertility Elements in South and Southeast Asian Buddhism,” Eastern Buddhist 32(2), 128–156.
44. Hatzinikolaou, Nikolaos (1996). “The Orthodox Christian Approach” in Part Seven: Nature and Status of the Embryo: Scientific, Philosophical and Legal Aspect. 3rd Symposium on Bioethics: Medically Assisted Procreation and Protection of Human Embryo and Fetuses, 103–108.
45. Inhorn, Marcia C. (1994). Quest for Conception: Gender, Infertility, and Egyptian Medical Traditions. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
46. Inhorn, Marcia C. (1996). Infertility and Patriarchy: The Cultural Politics of Gender and Family Life in Egypt. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
47. Inhorn, Marcia C. (2002). “Sexuality, Masculinity, and Infertility in Egypt: Potent Troubles in the Marital and Medical Encounters,” The Journal of Men’s Studies 10(3), 343–359.
48. Inhorn, Marcia C. (2003a). “Global Infertility and the Globalization of New Reproductive Technologies: Illustrations from Egypt,” Social Science and Medicine 56, 1837–1851.
49. Inhorn, Marcia C. (2003b). “‘The Worms Are Weak’: Male Infertility and Patriarchal Paradoxes in Egypt,” Men and Masculinities 5(3), 236–256.
50. Inhorn, Marcia C. (2003c). Local Babies, Global Science: Gender, Religion, and In Vitro Fertilization in Egypt. New York: Routledge.
51. Inhorn, Marcia C. (2004). “Middle Eastern Masculinities in the Age of New Reproductive Technologies: Male Infertility and Stigma in Egypt and Lebanon,” Medical Anthropological Quarterly 18(2), 162–182.
52. Inhorn, Marcia C. (2005). “Fatwas and ARTs: IVF and Gamete Donation in Sunni v. Shi’a Islam,” The Journal of Gender, Race and Justice 9(2), 291–317.
53. Inhorn, Marcia C. (2006a). “‘He Won’t Be My Son’: Middle Eastern Muslim Men’s Discourses of Adoption and Gamete Donation,” Medical Anthropology Quarterly 20(1), 94–120.
54. Inhorn, Marcia C. (2006b). “Making Muslim Babies: IVF and Gamete Donation in Sunni Versus Shi’a Islam,” Culture, Medicine and Psychiatry 30, 427–450.
55. Inhorn, Marcia C. (2007). “Masturbation, Semen Collection and Men’s IVF Experiences: Anxieties in the Muslim World.” Body & Society 13(3), 37–53.
56. Inhorn, Marcia C., and Carolyn F. Sargent (2006). “Medical Anthropology in the Muslim World: Ethnographic Reflections on Reproductive and Child Health,” Medical Anthropology Quarterly 20(1), 1–11.
57. Jakobovits, Yoel (1994).“Male Infertility: Halakhic Issues,” in Richard V. Grazi (ed.), Be Fruitful and Multiply: Fertility Therapy and the Jewish Tradition. Spring Valley, NY: Genesis Jerusalem Press, 55–78.
58. Jakobovits, Yoel (1997). “Male Infertility: Halakic Issues in Investigation and Management,” in Emanuel Feldman and Joel B. Wolowelsky (eds.), Jewish Law and the New Reproductive Technologies. Hoboken, NJ: KTAV, 115–138.
59. Jenkins, Gwynne L. with Silvia Vargas Obando and José Badilla Navas (2002). “Childlessness, Adoption, and Milagros de Dios in Costa Rica,” in Marcia C. Inhorn and Frank van Balen (eds.), Infertility Around the Globe: New Thinking on Childlessness, Gender, and Reproductive Technologies. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 171–189.
60. Jenkins, Philip (2002). “The Next Christianity.” The Atlantic 290(3), 3–68.
61. Kahn, Susan Martha (2000). Reproducing Jews: A Cultural Account of Assisted Conception in Israel. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
62. Kahn, Susan Martha (2002). “Rabbis and Reproduction: The Uses of New Reproductive Technologies Among Ultraorthdox Jews in Israel,” in Marcia C. Inhorn and Frank van Balen (eds.), Infertility Around the Globe: New Thinking on Childlessness, Gender, and Reproductive Technologies. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 283–297.
63. Kahn, Susan Martha (2006). “Making Technology Familiar: Orthodox Jews and Infertility Support, Advice, and Inspiration,” Culture, Medicine and Psychiatry 30, 467–480.
64. Kanaanah, Rhoda Ann (2002). Birthing the Nation: Strategies of Palestinian Women in Israel. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
65. Kass, Leon (2002). Life, Liberty and the Defense of Dignity: The Challenge for Bioethics. San Francisco, CA: Encounter Books.
66. Katsumata, Yoshinao (2000). “Organ Transplantation, In-Vitro Fertilization, and Euthanasia in Japan,” Forensic Science International 113, 491–493.
67. Keown, Damien (1995). Buddhism and Bioethics. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
68. Keown, Damien (2005). Buddhist Ethics: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
69. Khanna, Sunil K. (1999). “New Reproductive Technology in India: Social Context, Legal Implications, and Health Outcomes,” Anthropologist 1(1), 61–71.
70. Kleinman, Arthur (1995). Writing at the Margin: Discourse Between Anthropology and Medicine. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
71. Lauritzen, Paul (1993). Pursuing Parenthood: Ethical Issues in Assisted Reproduction. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
72. Layne, Linda L. (1992). “Of Fetuses and Angels: Fragmentation and Integration in Narratives of Pregnancy Loss,” in Linda L. Layne and David J. Hess (eds.), Knowledge and Society: The Anthropology of Science and Technology. Greenwich, CT: JAI, 29–58.
73. Lewin, Ellen (1998). “Wives, Mothers, and Lesbians: Rethinking Resistance in the US,” in Margaret Lock and Patricia A. Kaufert (eds.), Pragmatic Women and Body Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
74. Lock, Margaret (1998). “Perfecting Society: Reproductive Technologies, Genetic Testing, and the Planned Family in Japan,” in Margaret Lock and Patricia A. Kaufert (eds.), Pragmatic Women and Body Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press, 206–239.
75. Lock, Margaret, and Patricia A. Kaufert (1998). “Introduction,” in Margaret Lock and Patricia A. Kaufert (eds.), Pragmatic Women and Body Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1–27.
76. Malin, Maili (2002). “Made in Finland: Infertility Doctors’ Representations of Children,” Critical Public Health 1(24), 291–308.
77. Malpani, A., and A. Malpani (1992). “Simplifying Assisted Conception Techniques to Make Them Universally Available—A View from India,” Human Reproduction 7(1), 49–50.
78. Marglin, Frédérique Apffel (1985). “Female Sexuality in the Hindu World,” in Clarissa W. Atkinson, Constance H. Buchanan, and Margaret R. Miles (eds.), Immaculate and Powerful: The Female in Sacred Image and Social Reality. The Harvard Women’s Studies in Religion Series. Boston, MA: Beacon, 39–60.
79. May, William E. (2006). “Cloning Humans vs. Begetting Children.” http://www.culture-of-life. org/?Control=ArticleMaster&aid=1415&c=4&p=2 (accessed July 6, 2006).
80. McCormick, Richard A. (1987). “Surrogate Motherhood: A Stillborn Idea,” Second Opinion 5, 128–132.
81. McCormick, Richard A. (1989). The Critical Calling: Reflections on Moral Dilemmas Since Vatican Council II. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
82. “Medical Ethics” (2002). Hinduism Today July–September. http://www.hinduismtoday.com/archives/2002/7-9/40-47_ayurveda.shtml (last accessed April 19, 2006).
83. Meilaender, Gilbert (1997). “Begetting and Cloning,” First Things 74 (June/July), 41–43.
84. Meirow, D., and J.G. Schenker (1997). “The Current Status of Sperm Donation in Assisted Reproductive Technology: Ethical and Legal Considerations,” Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics 14, 133–138.
85. Meseguer, Marcos, Nicolás Garrido, José Remohí, Carlos Simón, and Antonio Pellicer (2002). “Gender Selection: Ethical, Scientific, Legal, and Practical Issues,” Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics 19(9), 443–446.
86. Missouri, Synod (2002). What Child Is This? Marriage, Family and Human Cloning. A Report of the Commission on Theology and Church Relations of the Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod April. http://www.lcms.org/graphics/assets/media/CTCR/45061CloningCTCRfinal.pdf (accessed July 8, 2006).
87. Mohapatra, Ratnaprava, S.K. Dash, and S.N. Padhy (2001). “Ethnobiological Studies from Manusmruti: IX. Niyoga Prathaa, A Natural Process of Artificial Insemination,” Journal of Human Ecology 12(1), 33–38.
88. Mori, Takahide, and Hirohiko Watanabe (2002). “Ethical Considerations on Indications for Gender Selection in Japan,” Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics 19(9), 420–425.
89. Mulkay, Michael (1994). “Science and Family in the Great Embryo Debate,” Sociology 28(3), 699–715.
90. O’Donovan, Oliver (1984). Begotten or Made?. Oxford: Clarendon.
91. Orthodox Church in America (1992). Tenth All-American Council. “The Procreation of Children.” http://www.antiochian.org/moral_issues_family (accessed May 31, 2007).
92. Paxson, Heather (2004). Making Modern Mothers: Ethics and Family Planning in Urban Greece. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
93. Paxson, Heather (2006). “Reproduction as Spiritual Kin Work: Orthodoxy, IVF and the Moral Economy of Motherhood in Greece,” Culture, Medicine and Psychiatry 30, 481–505.
94. Pope John XXIII (1961). Encyclical Mater et Magistra, III, AAS 53(1961), 447.
95. Pope Paul VI (1968). Humanae Vitae, AAS 60(1968), 489.
96. Post, Stephen G., and Barbara Andolsen (1989). “Recent Works on Reproductive Technology,” Religious Studies Review 15(3), 210–218.
97. Qiu, Ren-zong (2002). “Sociocultural Dimensions of Infertility and Assisted Reproduction in the Far East,” in E. Vayena, P. Rowe, and D. Griffin (eds.), Report of a meeting on Medical, Ethical, and Social Aspects of Assisted Reproduction, 17–21 September 2001. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO, 75–80. http://www.who.int/reproductive-health/infertility/12.pdf (accessed July 8, 2007).
98. Ragoné, Helena (1998). “Incontestable Motivations,” in Sarah Franklin and Helena Ragoné (eds.), Reproducing Reproduction: Kinship, Power, and Technological Innovation. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press, 118–131.
99. Reichman, Edward (1997). “The Rabbinic Conception of Conception: An Exercise in Fertility,” in Emanuel Feldman and Joel B. Wolowelsky (eds.), Jewish Law and the New Reproductive Technologies. Jersey City, NJ: KTAV Publishing, 1–35.
100. Renteln, Alison Dundes (1992). “Sex Selection and Reproductive Freedom,” Women’s Studies International Forum 15(3), 405–426.
101. Roberts, Elizabeth F.S. (2006). “God’s Laboratory: Religious Rationalities and Modernity in Ecuadorian In Vitro Fertilization,” Culture, Medicine and Psychiatry 30, 507–536.
102. Rosenfeld, Azriel (1997). “Generation, Gestation and Judaism,” in Emanuel Feldman and Joel B. Wolowelsky (eds.), Jewish Law and the New Reproductive Technologies. Hoboken, NJ: KTAV Publishing, 36–45.
103. Ryan, Maura A. (2001). The Ethics and Economics of Assisted Reproduction: The Cost of Longing. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
104. Ryan, Maura A. (2004). “Beyond a Western Bioethics,” Theological Studies 65, 158–177.
105. Satha-Anand, Suwanna (2001). “Buddhism on Sexuality and Enlightenment,” in Patricia Beattie Jung, Mary E. Hunt, and Radhika Balakrishnan (eds.), Good Sex: Feminist Perspectives from the World’s Religions. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 113–124.
106. Schenker, Joseph G. (1992). “Reproductive Health Care Policies Around the World: Religious Views Regarding Treatment of Infertility by Assisted Reproductive Technologies,” Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics 9(1), 3–8.
107. Schenker, Joseph G. (2002). “Gender Selection: Cultural and Religious Perspectives.” Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics 19(9), 400–410.
108. Sen, Amartya (1990). “More Than 100 Million Women Are Missing.” New York Times Review of Books 37 (December 20). http://www.nybooks.com/turing.library.northwestern.edu/articls/3408 (accessed March 13, 2008).
109. Sheean, Leon A. (2004). “Protecting the Unborn.” http://www.oca.org/PDFS/christianwitness/2004 PMConf-LScheean.pdf (accessed July 12, 2006).
110. “Should Surrogate Motherhood Be Banned?” Forum (2001). Beijing Review (May 10, 2001), 28–29.
111. Sills, E. Scott, and Gianpero D. Palermo (2002). “Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis for Elective Sex Selection, the IVF Market Economy, and the Child—Another Long Day’s Journey Into Night?,” Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics 19(9), 433–437.
112. Sonbol, Amira el Azhary (1995). “Adoption in Islamic Society: A Historical Survey,” in Elizabeth Warnock Fernea (ed.), Children in the Muslim Middle East. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press, 45–67.
113. Stone, Jennifer L. (1991). “Contextualizing Biogenetic and Reproductive Technologies,” Critical Studies in Mass Communication 8, 309–332.
114. Strathern, Marilyn (1992a). After Nature: English Kinship in the Late Twentieth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
115. Strathern, Marilyn (1992b). Reproducing the Future: Anthropology, Kinship, and the New Reproductive Technologies. New York: Routledge.
116. Thompson, Charis (1998). “Producing Reproduction: Techniques of Normalization and Naturalization in Fertility Clinics,” in Sarah Franklin and Helena Ragoné (eds.), Reproducing Reproduction: Kinship, Power, and Technological Innovation. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press, 66–101.
117. Thompson, Charis M. (2002). “Fertile Ground: Feminists Theorize Infertility,” in Marcia C. Inhorn and Frank van Balen (eds.), Infertility Around the Globe: New Thinking on Childlessness, Gender, and Reproductive Technologies. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 52–78.
118. Thompson, Charis M. (2005). Making Parents: The Ontological Choreography of Reproductive Technologies. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
119. Thompson, Charis M. (2006). “God Is in the Details: Comparative Perspectives on the Intertwining of Religion and Assisted Reproductive Technologies,” Culture, Medicine and Psychiatry 30, 557–561.
120. Tober, Diane (2004). “Shi’ism, Pragmatism, and Modernity: Islamic Bioethics and Health Policy in the Islamic Republic of Iran.” Presentation at the University of Michigan, April 14.
121. Traina, Cristina L.H. (1999). Feminist Ethics and Natural Law: The End of the Anathemas. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
122. Tremayne, Soraya (2005). “The Moral, Ethical, and Legal Implications of Egg, Sperm, and Embryo Donation in Iran.” Unpublished manuscript. Presented at Reproductive Disruptions: Childlessness, Adoption, and Other Reproductive Complexities, University of Michigan, May 19–22, 2005.
123. Waters, Brent (2001). Reproductive Technology: Towards a Theology of Procreative Stewardship. Ethics and Theology Series. Cleveland, OH: Pilgrim Press.
124. Weston, Kath (1991). Families We Choose: Lesbians, Gays, Kinship. New York: Columbia University Press.
125. Williams, Paul (1991). “Buddhism and Sexuality–Some Notes,” Middle Way 66(August), 101–106.
126. Zuhur, Sherifa (1992). Revealing Reveiling: Islamist Gender Ideology in Contemporary Egypt. Albany, NY: SUNY.