Evaluating hydrologic response of an agricultural watershed for watershed analysis

Water (Switzerland)

Volumn 3, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 604-617

  Jha, Manoj Kumar ^a  

^a NORTH CAROLINA A AND T STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Calibration and validation; Hydrologic simulation; Sensitivity analysis; SWAT

Indexed keywords

AGRICULTURAL ROBOTS; AGRICULTURE; CLIMATE CHANGE; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY; LAND USE; QUALITY MANAGEMENT; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; STREAM FLOW; WATER CONSERVATION; WATER MANAGEMENT; WATER QUALITY;

AGRICULTURAL WATERSHEDS; CALIBRATION AND VALIDATIONS; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY'S; HYDROLOGICAL ASSESSMENT; INFLUENCE-COEFFICIENT METHOD; POINT AND NONPOINT SOURCES; SOIL AND WATER ASSESSMENT TOOL; TOTAL MAXIMUM DAILY LOAD;

WATERSHEDS;

EID: 85092433455     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20734441     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3390/w3020604     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Moriasi, D.N.; Arnold, J.G.; Van Liew, M.W.; Bingner, R.L.; Harmel, R.D.; Veith, T.L. Model evaluation guidelines for systematic quantification of accuracy in watershed simulations. Trans. ASABE 2007, 50, 885-900.
2. Johansen, N.B.; Imhoff, J.C.; Kittle, J.L.; Donigian, A.S. Hydrologic Simulation Program-FORTRAN (HSPF): User's Manual for Release 8; EPA-600/3-84-066; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Athens, GA, USA, 1984.
3. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Hydrologic Engineering Center (USACE-HEC). HEC-HMS Hydrologic Modeling System User'S Manual; USACE-HEC: Davis, CA, USA, 2000.
4. CREAMS: A Field-Scale Model for Chemicals, Runoff, and Erosion from Agricultural Management Systems; Conservation Research Report No. 26; Knisel, W.G., Ed.; USA-SEA: Washington, DC, USA, 1980.
5. Williams, J.R.; Jones, C.A.; Dyke, P.T. A modeling approach to determining the relationship between erosion and soil productivity. Trans. ASAE 1984, 27, 129-144.
6. Young, R.A.; Onstad, C.A.; Bosch, D.D.; Anderson, W.P. AGNPS: A non-point source pollution model for evaluating agricultural watersheds. J. Soil Water Conserv. 1989, 44, 168-173.
7. Saleh, A.; Arnold, J.G.; Gassman, P.W.; Hauck, L.M.; Rosenthal, W.D.; Williams, J.R.; McFarland, A.M.S. Application of SWAT for the Upper North Bosque River watershed. Trans. ASAE 2000, 43, 1077-1087.
8. Arnold, J.G.; Srinivasan, R.; Muttiah, R.S.; Williams, J.R. Large area hydrologic modeling and assessment Part I: Model development. J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc. 1998, 34, 73-89.
9. Gassman, P.W.; Reyes, M.; Green, C.H.; Arnold, J.G. The Soil and Water Assessment Tool: Historical development, applications, and future directions. Trans. ASABE 2007, 50, 1211-1250.
10. Arnold, J.G.; Allen, P.M. Simulating hydrologic budgets for three Illinois watersheds. J. Hydrol. 1996, 176, 57-77.
11. Arnold, J.G.; Muttiah, R.S.; Srinivasan, R.; Allen, P.M. Regional estimation of base flow and groundwater recharge in the Upper Mississippi River Basin. J. Hydrol. 1999, 227, 21-40.
12. FitzHugh, T.W.; Mackay, D.S. Impacts of input parameter spatial aggregation on an agricultural nonpoint source pollution model. J. Hydrol. 2000, 236, 35-53.
13. Jha, M.K.; Gassman, P.W.; Secchi, S.; Gu, R.; Arnold, J.G. Effect of watershed subdivision on SWAT flow, sediment, and nutrient predictions. J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc. 2004, 40, 811-825.
14. Jha, M.K.; Pan, Z.; Takle, E.S.; Gu, R. Impacts of climate change on streamflow in the Upper Mississippi River Basin: A regional climate model perspective. J. Geophys. Res. 2004, 109, D09105.
15. Stone, M.C.; Hotchkiss, R.H.; Hubbard, C.M.; Fontaine, T.A.; Mearns, L.O.; Arnold, J.G. Impacts of climate change on Missouri River basin water yield. J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc. 2001, 37, 1119-1130.
16. Whittemore, R.C. The BASINS Model. Water Environ. Technol. 1998, 10, 57-61.
17. SWAT Literature Database for Peer-reviewed Articles. Available online: https://www.card.iastate.edu/swat_articles (accessed on 20 January 2011)
18. Lenhart, T.; Eckhardt, K.; Fohrer, N.; Frede, H.-G. Comparison of two different approaches of sensitivity analysis. Phys. Chem. Earth 2002, 27, 645-654.
19. Arnold, J.G.; Srinivasan, R.; Muttiah, R.S.; Allen, P.M.; Walker, C. Continental scale simulation of the hydrologic balance. J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc. 1999, 35, 1037-1052.
20. Spruill, C.A.; Workman, S.R.; Taraba, J.L. Simulation of daily and monthly stream discharge from small watershed using the SWAT Model. Trans. ASAE 2000, 43, 1431-1439.
21. Sexton, A.M.; Shismohammadi, A.; Sedghi, A.M.; Montas, H.J. Impact of parameter uncertainty on critical SWAT output simulations. Trans. ASABE 2011, 54, 461-471.
22. Shen, Z.; Hong, Q.; Yu, H.; Niu, J. Parameter uncertainty analysis of non-point source pollution from different land use types. Sci. Total Environ. 2010, 408, 1971-1978.
23. Zhang, X.R.; Srinivasan, R.; Bosch, D. Calibration and uncertainty analysis of the SWAT model using Genetic Algorithms and Bayesian Model Averaging. J. Hydrol. 2009, 374, 307-317.
24. Tolson, B.A.; Shoemaker, C.A. Efficient prediction uncertainty approximation in the calibration of environmental simulation models. Water Resour. Res. 2008, 44, 1-19.
25. Neitsch, S.L.; Arnold, J.G.; Kiniry, J.R.; Williams, J.R. Soil and Water Assessment Tool Theoretical Documentation, Version 2000; Blackland Research Center, Texas Agricultural Experiment Station: Temple, TX, USA, 2000.
26. Upper Mississippi River Basin Loading Database (Nutrients and Sediments). Available online: http://www.umesc.usgs.gov/data_library/sediment_nutrients/sediment_nutrient_page.html (accessed on 20 January 2011).
27. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). BASINS 3.0: Better Assessment Science Integrating Point and Nonpoint Sources; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water, Office of Science and Technology: Washington, DC, USA, 2001.
28. Di Luzio, M.; Srinivasan, R.; Arnold, J.G.; Neitsch, S.L. Soil and Water Assessment Tool: ArcView GIS Interface Manual: Version 2000; GSWRL Report 02-03, BRC Report 02-07; Texas Water Resources Institute TR-193: College Station, TX, USA; p. 346.
29. U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA). State Soil Geographic (STATSGO) Data Base: Data Use Information; Miscellaneous Publication Number 1492; U.S. Department of Agriculture: Fort Worth, TX, USA, 1994.
30. Iowa Environmental Mesonet-A weather database for the state of Iowa. Available online: http://www.mesonet.agron.iastate.edu (accessed on 20 January 2011).
31. Helsel, D.R.; Hirsch, R.M. Statistical Methods in Water Resources; Elsevier: New York, NY, USA, 1992.
32. Gu, R.; Li, Y. River temperature sensitivity to hydraulic and meteorological parameters. J. Environ. Manage. 2002, 66, 43-56.