Impact of parameter uncertainty on critical SWAT output simulations

Transactions of the ASABE

Volumn 54, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 461-471

  Sexton, Aisha M ^a,b   Shirmohammadi, Adel ^c   Sadeghi, Ali M ^b   Montas, Hubert J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

^b AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH SERVICE   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

Author keywords

MFORM; Parameter uncertainty; SWAT; TMDL

Indexed keywords

ANNUAL AVERAGE; COMPUTATIONALLY EFFICIENT; FIRST ORDER RELIABILITY METHODS; HIGHLY SENSITIVE; IMPROVED ALGORITHM; INPUT PARAMETER; MANAGEMENT SCENARIOS; MARYLAND; MEAN VALUES; MFORM; MODEL OUTPUTS; MODEL RESULTS; MODEL UNCERTAINTIES; NUTRIENT OUTPUT; PARAMETER UNCERTAINTY; SWAT; TMDL; TOTAL MAXIMUM DAILY LOAD; UNCERTAIN PARAMETERS; WATER QUALITY MODELS; WATERSHED MODELS; WET PERIOD;

ALGORITHMS; ANOXIC SEDIMENTS; LANDFORMS; RELIABILITY ANALYSIS; SEDIMENTOLOGY; STREAM FLOW; WATER POLLUTION; WATER QUALITY; WATERSHEDS;

UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

ALGORITHM; CALIBRATION; HYDROLOGICAL MODELING; NUMERICAL MODEL; PARAMETERIZATION; RELIABILITY ANALYSIS; STREAMFLOW; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS; WATER MANAGEMENT; WATER QUALITY; WATERSHED;

MARYLAND; UNITED STATES;

EID: 79954485592     PISSN: 21510032     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Arabi, M., R. S. Govindaraju, and M. M. Hantush. 2007. A probabilistic approach for analysis of uncertainty in the evaluation of watershed management practices. J. Hydrol. 333(2-4): 459-471. (Pubitemid 46070183)
2. Arnold, J. G., R. Srinivasan, R. S. Muttiah, and J. R. Williams. 1998. Large-area hydrologic modeling and assessment: Part I. Model development. J. American Water Resources Assoc. 34(1): 73-89. (Pubitemid 28190080)
3. Arnold, J. G., R. Srinivasan, R. S. Muttiah, and P. M. Allen. 1999. Continental-scale simulation of the hydrologic balance. J. American Water Resources Assoc. 35(5): 1037-1051.
4. Behera, S., and R. K. Panda. 2006. Evaluation of management alternatives for an agricultural watershed in a sub-humid subtropical region using a physical process based model. Agric. Ecosystems and Environ. 113: 62-72. (Pubitemid 43207347)
5. Benaman, J., C. A. Shoemaker, and D. A. Haith. 2005. Calibration and validation of Soil and Water Assessment Tool on an agricultural watershed in upstate New York. J. Hydrol. Eng. 10(5): 363-374. (Pubitemid 41300258)
6. Benham, B. L., C. Baffaut, R. W. Zeckoski, K. R. Mankin, Y. A. Pachepsky, A. M. Sadeghi, K. M. Brannan, M. L. Soupir, and M. J. Habersack. 2006. Modeling bacteria fate and transport in watersheds to support TMDLs. Trans. ASABE 49(4): 987-1002. (Pubitemid 44682594)
7. Blankenship, K. 2007. Out of shape: No matter how one looks at it, bay's health fails to make the grade. Chesapeake Bay Journal 17(3): 1, 10-12. Available at: www.bayjournal.com/index.cfm? issue=284.
8. Bobba, A. G., V. P. Singh, and L. Bengtsson. 1996. Application of first-order and Monte Carlo analysis in watershed water quality models. Water Resources Mgmt. 10(3): 219-240.
9. Boorman, D. B. 2003. Climate, hydrochemistry, and economics of surface-water systems (CHESS): Adding a European dimension to the catchment modelling experience developed under LOIS. Sci. Total Environ. 314-316: 411-437. (Pubitemid 37138550)
10. Borah, D. K., G. Yagow, A. Saleh, P. L. Barnes, W. Rosenthal, E. C. Krug, and L. M. Hauck. 2006. Sediment and nutrient modeling for TMDL development and implementation. Trans. ASABE 49(4): 967-986. (Pubitemid 44682593)
11. Brighton Webs. 2007. Beta and gamma distributions. Brighton, U.K.: Brighton Webs, Ltd. Available at: www.brighton-webs.co. uk/distributions/beta. asp. Accessed 6 June 2007.
12. Brown, L. C. 2001. Modeling uncertainty with QUAL2E-UNCAS: A case study. In Proc. WEF National TMDL Science Issues Conf. Alexandria, Va.: Water Environment Federation.
13. Brown, L. C., and T. O. Barnwell. 1987. The enhanced stream water quality models QUAL2E and QUAL2E-UNCAS: Documentation and user manual. EPA/600/3-87/007. Athens, Ga.: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Environmental Research Laboratory.
14. Bubb, K., and T. Meixner. 2005. Economic impact of model predictive uncertainty on TMDL assessments: A case study in the Lake Elsinore San Jacinto watershed. In Proc. 3rd Conf. Watershed Mgmt. to Meet Water Quality Standards and Emerging TMDL. ASABE Paper No. 701P0105. St. Joseph, Mich.: ASABE.
15. Chu, T. W., and A. Shirmohammadi. 2004. Evaluation of the SWAT model's hydrology component in the piedmont physiographic region of Maryland. Trans. ASAE 47(4): 1057-1073. (Pubitemid 39384439)
16. Chu, T. W., A. Shirmohammadi, H. Montas, and A. Sadeghi. 2004. Evaluation of the SWAT model's sediment and nutrient components in the piedmont physiographic region of Maryland. Trans. ASAE 47(5): 1523-1538. (Pubitemid 40033632)
17. Coelho, M. A. 1974. Spatial variability of water related soil physical parameters. PhD diss. Tucson, Ariz.: University of Arizona.
18. DiLuzio, M., R. Srinivasan, and J. G. Arnold. 2004. A GIS-coupled hydrological model system for the watershed assessment of agricultural nonpoint and point sources of pollution. Trans. GIS 8(1): 113-136. (Pubitemid 38171533)
19. Dubus, I. G., and C. D. Brown. 2002. Sensitivity and first-step uncertainty analyses for the preferential flow model MACRO. J. Environ. Qual. 31(1): 227-240. (Pubitemid 34106496)
20. Dubus, I. G., C. D. Brown, and S. Beulke. 2003. Sources of uncertainty in pesticide fate modeling. Sci. Total Environ. 317(1-3): 53-72. (Pubitemid 37433803)
21. Eckhardt, K., L. Breuer, and H.-G. Frede. 2003. Parameter uncertainty and the significance of simulated land use change effects. J. Hydrol. 273: 164-176. (Pubitemid 36260967)
22. Gallagher, M., and J. Doherty. 2007. Parameter estimation and uncertainty analysis for a watershed model. Environ. Modelling Software 22(7): 1000:1020. (Pubitemid 46209835)
23. Jensen, K. H., and J. C. Refsgaard. 1991. Spatial variability of physical parameters and processes in two field soils: Part III. Solute transport at field scale. Nordic Hydrol. 22(5): 327-340.
24. Karamouz, M., M. Taheriyoun, M. Seyedabadi, and S. Behboodian. 2009. Evaluation of uncertainty in the simulation of watershed nutrient load: A case study. Proc. World Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2009: Great Rivers 342: 6417-6426. Reston, Va.: ASCE.
25. Lenhart, T., K. Eckhardt, N. Fohrer, and H.-G. Frede. 2002. Comparison of two different approaches of sensitivity analysis. Physics and Chem. of the Earth 27(2): 645-654.
26. Li, Z., Z. Xu, Q. Shao, and J. Yang. 2009. Parameter estimation and uncertainty analysis of SWAT model in upper reaches of the Heihe River basin. Hydrol. Proc. 23(19): 2744-2753.
27. Linsley, R. K., M. A. Kohler, and J. L. H. Paulhus. 1982. Hydrology for Engineers. 3rd ed. New York, N.Y.: McGraw-Hill.
28. McCuen, R. H. 2002. Approach to confidence interval estimation for curve numbers. J. Hydrol. Eng. 7(1): 43-48. (Pubitemid 34119870)
29. McKay, A. D., W. J. Conover, and R. J. Beckman. 1979. A comparison of three methods for selecting values of input variables in the analysis of output from a computer code. Technometrics 21(2): 239-245. (Pubitemid 9452235)
30. MDE. 2008. The 2008 integrated report of surface water quality in Maryland. Baltimore, Md.: Maryland Department of the Environment. Available at: www.mde.state.md.us/programs/ Water/TMDL/Integrated303dReports/Documents/www. mde.stat e.md.us/assets/document/2008-IR-Parts-A-thru-E(1).pdf. Accessed 3 March 2011.
31. Mein, R. G., and C. L. Larson. 1973. Modeling infiltration during a steady rain. Water Resources Res. 9(2): 384-394.
32. Melching, C. S., and W. Bauwens. 2001. Uncertainty in coupled nonpoint source and stream water quality models. J. Water Resources Planning and Mgmt. 127(6): 403-413. (Pubitemid 33066773)
33. Melching, C. S., and C. G. Yoon. 1996. Key source of uncertainty in QUAL2E model of Passaic River. J. Water Resources Planning and Mgmt. 122(2): 105-113.
34. Moglen, G. E. 2004. Introduction to GISHydro2000: Training manual (Sept. 2004). College Park, Md.: University of Maryland. Available at: www.gishydro.umd.edu. Accessed 21 March 2005.
35. Munoz-Carpena, R., G. Vellidis, A. Shirmohammadi, and W. W. Wallender. 2006. Evaluation of modeling tools for TMDL development and implementation. Trans. ASABE 49(4): 961-965. (Pubitemid 44682592)
36. Neitsch, S. L., J. G. Arnold, J. R. Kiniry, and J. R. Williams. 2001. Soil and Water Assessment Tool User's Manual. Version 2000. Temple, Tex.: USDA-ARS.
37. Reungsang, P., R. S. Kanwar, M. Jha, P. W. Gassman, K. Ahmad, and A. Saleh. 2007. Calibration and validation of SWAT for the upper Maquoketa River watershed. Intl. Agric. Eng. J. 16(1-2): 35-48. (Pubitemid 47394428)
38. Searing, M. L., and A. Shirmohammadi. 1994. The design, construction, and analysis of a GIS database for use in reducing nonpoint-source pollution on an agricultural watershed. ASAE Paper No. 943551. St. Joseph, Mich.: ASAE.
39. Sexton, A. M. 2007. Evaluation of SWAT model applicability for watershed impairment identification and TMDL assessment. PhD diss. College Park, Md.: University of Maryland, Fischell Department of Bioengineering.
40. Sexton, A. M., A. M. Sadeghi, X. Zhang, R. Srinivasan, A. Shirmohammadi. 2010. Using NEXRAD and rain gauge precipitation data for hydrologic calibration of SWAT in a northeastern watershed. Trans. ASABE 53(5): 1501-1510.
41. Shen, Z., Q. Hong, H. Yu, and R. Liu. 2008. Parameter uncertainty analysis of the nonpoint-source pollution in the Daning River watershed of the Three Gorges Reservoir region, China. Sci. Total Environ. 405(1-3): 195-205.
42. Shirmohammadi, A., I. Chaubey, R. D. Harmel, D. D. Bosch, R. Muñoz-Carpena, C. Dharmasri, A. Sexton, M. Arabi, M. L. Wolfe, J. Frankenberger, C. Graff, and T. M. Sohrabi. 2006. Uncertainty in TMDL models. Trans. ASABE 49(4): 1033-1049. (Pubitemid 44682597)
43. Srinivasan, R., J. G. Arnold, and C. A. Jones. 1998. Hydrologic modelling of the United States with the Soil and Water Assessment Tool. Water Resources Development 14(3): 315-325. (Pubitemid 29004538)
44. Sohrabi, T. M., A. Shirmohammadi, and H. Montas. 2002. Uncertainty in nonpoint-source pollution models and associated risks. Environ. Forensics 3(2): 179-189.
45. Sohrabi, T. M., A. Shirmohammadi, T. W. Chu, H. Montas, and A. P. Nejadhashemi. 2003. Uncertainty analysis of hydrologic and water quality predictions for a small watershed using SWAT2000. Environ. Forensics 4(4): 229-238. (Pubitemid 38370195)
46. Tolson, B. A., and C. A. Shoemaker. 2007. Cannonsville reservoir watershed SWAT2000 model development, calibration, and validation. J. Hydrol. 337(1-2): 68-86. (Pubitemid 46483472)
47. Tomovic, R. 1963. Sensitivity Analysis of Dynamic Systems. New York, N.Y.: McGraw-Hill.
48. Tung, Y. K. 1996. Uncertainty and reliability analysis in water resources engineering. In Stochastic Hydraulics '96, 29-46. K. S. Tickle, I. C. Goulter, C. Xu, S. A. Wasimi, and F. Bouchart, eds. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: A.A. Balkema.
49. U.S. Congress. 1972. Amendments to the Federal Water Pollution Control Act of 1972, Public Law 92-500, Title 33, Chapter 26, subchapter III, section 1313(d). Washington, D.C.: Federal Register.
50. USDA-SCS. 1990. Maryland Chesapeake Bay cooperative river basin study. Washington, D.C.: USDA Soil Conservation Service.
51. USEPA. 2002. The twenty needs report: How research can improve the TMDL program. EPA 841-B-02-002. Washington, D.C.:
52. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water. Vandenberghe, V., A. V. Griensven, and W. Bauwens. 2001. Sensitivity analysis and calibration of the parameters of ESWAT: Application to the River Dender. Water Sci. and Tech. 43(7): 295-301.
53. Wagner, R. C., T. A. Dillaha, and G. Yagow. 2007. An assessment of the reference watershed approach for TMDLs with biological impairments. Water Air and Soil Pollution 181(1-4): 341-354. (Pubitemid 46631045)
54. White, K. L., and I. Chaubey. 2005. Sensitivity analysis, calibration, and validation for a multisite and multivariable SWAT model. J. American Water Resources Assoc. 41(5): 1077-1089. (Pubitemid 41443218)
55. Winchell, M., R. Srinivasn, M. DiLuzio, and J. G. Arnold. 2007. ArcSWAT Interface for SWAT200: User's Guide. Temple, Tex.: Blackland Research Center, Texas Agricultural Experiment Station, and USDA-ARS Grassland, Soil and Water Research Laboratory.
56. Wyss, G. D., and K. H. Jorgensen. 1998. A user's guide to LHS: Sandia's Latin hypercube sampling softeware. Tech. Report SAND98-0210. Albuquerque, N.M.: Sandia National Laboratories.
57. Yang, J., P. Reichert, K. C. Abbaspour, J. Xia, and H. Yang. 2008. Comparing uncertainty analysis techniques for a SWAT application to the Chaohe basin in China. J. Hydrol. 358(1-2): 1-23.
58. Zhang, H. X., and S. L. Yu. 2004. Applying the first-order error analysis in determining the margin of safety for total maximum daily load computations. J. Environ. Eng. 130(6): 664-673. (Pubitemid 38762984)
59. Zhang, J., and C. T. Haan. 1996. Evaluation of uncertainty in estimated flow and phosphorus loads by FHANTM. Applied Eng. in Agric. 12(6): 663-669. (Pubitemid 126644753)