Towards efficient aerodynamic shape optimization based on the Navier-Stokes equations

15th AIAA Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference

Volumn , Issue , 2001, Pages

  Nemec, M ^a   Zingg, D W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS; DRAG; INVERSE PROBLEMS; LIFT; LIFT DRAG RATIO; LINEARIZATION; SHAPE OPTIMIZATION; TURBULENCE MODELS;

AERODYNAMIC SHAPE OPTIMIZATION; CONVERGENCE RATES; DRAG MINIMIZATION; LIFT ENHANCEMENT; LIFT TO DRAG RATIO; NAVIER-STOKES AERODYNAMICS; OBJECTIVE FUNCTIONS; PRECONDITIONED GMRES;

NAVIER STOKES EQUATIONS;

EID: 85088724110     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.2514/6.2001-2532     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (30)

1. Jameson, A., Aerodynamic Design via Control Theory, Institute for Computer Applications in Science and Engineering NASA CR-181749, 1988.
2. Baysal, O. and Eleshaky, M. E., Aerodynamic Sensitivity Analysis Methods for the Compressible Euler Equations, J. Fluids Engineering, Vol. 113, No. 4, 1991, pp. 681-688.
3. Drela, M., Design ans Optimization Method for Multi-Element Airfoils, AIAA Paper 93-0969, 1993.
4. Jou, W., Huffman, W., and Young, D., Practical Considerations in Aerodynamic Design Optimization, AIAA Paper 95-1730, 1995.
5. Sherman, L. L., Taylor III, A. C., Green, L. L., Newman, P. A., Hou, G. W., and Korivi, V. M., First-and Second-Order Aerodynamic Sensitivity Derivatives via Automatic Differentiation with Incremental Iterative Methods, J. Computational Physics, Vol. 129, 1996, pp. 307-331.
6. Jameson, A., Pierce, N. A., and Martinelli, L., Optimum Aerodynamic Design using the Navier-Stokes Equations, Theoretical and Computational Fluid Dynamics, Vol. 10, No. 1, 1998, pp. 213-237.
7. Soemarwoto, B. I. and Labrujere, T. E., Airfoil Design and Optimization Methods: Recent Progress at NLR, Inter. J. for Numerical Methods in Fluids, Vol. 30, No. 2, 1999, pp. 217-228.
8. Anderson, W. K. and Venkatakrishnan, V., Aerodynamic Design Optimization on Unstructured Grids with a Continuous Adjoint Formulation, AIAA Paper 97-0643, 1997.
9. Anderson, W. K. and Bonhaus, D. L., Aerodynamic Design on Unstructured Grids for Turbulent Flows, Tech. rep., NASA TM 112867, June 1997.
10. Korivi, V. M., Taylor III, A. C., Newman, P. A., Hou, G. W., and Jones, H. E., An Approximately Factored Incremental Strategy for Calculating Consistent Discrete Aerodynamic Sensitivity Derivatives, J. Computational Physics, Vol. 113, 1994, pp. 336-346.
11. Elliott, J. and Peraire, J., Progress Towards a 3D Aerodynamic Shape Optimization Tool for the Compressible High-Re Navier Stokes Equations Discretized on Unstructured Meshes, AIAA Paper 98-2897, June 1998.
12. Kim, S., Alonso, J. J., and Jameson, A., Two-dimensional High-Lift Aerodynamic Optimization Using the Continuous Adjoint Method, AIAA Paper 2000-4741, Sept. 2000.
13. Spalart, P. R. and Allmaras, S. R., A One-Equation Turbulence Model for Aerodynamic Flows, AIAA Paper 92-0439, 1992.
14. Nielsen, E. J. and Anderson, W. K., Aerodynamic Design Optimization on Unstructured Meshes Using the Navier Stokes Equations, AIAA Journal, Vol. 37, No. 11, 1999, pp. 1411-1419.
15. Giles, M. B., On the Use of Runge-Kutta Time-Marching and Multigrid for the Solution of Steady Adjoint Equations, Tech. Rep. 00-10, Oxford University Computing Laboratory, June 2000.
16. Saad, Y. and Schultz, M. H., GMRES: A Generalized Minimal Residual Algorithm for Solving Nonsymmetric Linear Systems, SIAM Journal on Scientific and Statistical Computing, Vol. 7, No. 3, 1986, pp. 856-869.
17. Eleshaky, M. E. and Baysal, O., Discrete Aerodynamic Sensitivity Analysis on Decomposed Computational Domains, Computers & Fluids, Vol. 23, No. 4, 1994, pp. 595-611.
18. Nielsen, E. J., Aerodynamic Design Sensitivities on an Unstructured Mesh Using the Navier Stokes Equations and a Discrete Adjoint Formulation, Ph.D. thesis, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, 1998.
19. Pueyo, A. and Zingg, D., Efficient Newton-Krylov Solver for Aerodynamic Computations, AIAA Journal, Vol. 36, No. 11, 1998, pp. 1991-1997.
20. Gill, P. E., Murray, W., and Wright, M. H., Practical Optimization, Academic Press Inc., 1981.
21. Elliott, J. and Peraire, J., Constrained, multipoint shape optimisation for complex 3D configurations, Aeronautical Journal, Vol. 102, No. 1017, 1998, pp. 365-376.
22. Wrenn, G. A., An Indirect Method for Numerical Optimization Using the Kreisselmeier-Steinhauser Function, Tech. rep., NASA CR 4220, March 1989.
23. de Boor, C., A Practical Guide to Splines, Springer-Verlag, 1978.
24. Farin, G. E., Curves and Surfaces for Computer-Aided Geometric Design: A Practical Guide, Academic Press, 1997.
25. Pulliam, T. H., Efficient Solution Methods for the Navier-Stokes Equations, Tech. rep., Lecture Notes for the Von Karman Institute for Fluid Dynamics Lecture Series, Brussels, Jan. 1986.
26. Dennis Jr., J. E. and Schnabel, R. B., Numerical Methods for Unconstrained Optimization and Nonlinear Equations, Prentice-Hall Inc., 1983.
27. Burgreen, G. W. and Baysal, O., Three-Dimensional Aerodynamic Shape Optimization Using Discrete Sensitivity Analysis, AIAA Journal, Vol. 34, No. 9, 1996, pp. 1761-1770.
28. Reuther, J. J., Jameson, A., Alonso, J. J., Rimlinger, M. J., and Saunders, D., Constrained Multipoint Aerodynamic Shape Optimization Using an Adjoint Formulation and Parallel Computers, Part 1, J. Aircraft, Vol. 36, No. 1, 1999, pp. 51-60.
29. Drela, M., Pros &; Cons of Airfoil Optimization, Frontiers of Computational Fluid Dynamics 1998, edited by D. A. Caughey and M. M. Hafez, World Scientific, Singapore, 1998, pp. 363-381.
30. Liebeck, R. H., A Class of Airfoils Designed for High Lift in Incompressible Flow, J. Aircraft, Vol. 10, No. 10, 1973, pp. 610-617.