Landmark-based geometric morphometrics and the study of allometry

SAE Technical Papers

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages

  Slice, Dennis E ^a   Stitzel, Joel ^a  

^a WAKE FOREST SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGY;

COMPUTATIONALLY EFFICIENT; GEOMETRIC MORPHOMETRICS; HUMAN MODEL; SHAPE VARIATIONS;

NAVIGATION;

EID: 85088716039     PISSN: 01487191     EISSN: 26883627     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4271/2004-01-2181     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (34)

1. Adams, D. C., Rohlf, F. J., and Slice, D. E., 2003. Geometric morphometrics: ten years of progress after the "revolution." Italian Journal of Zoology, In Press.
2. Boas, F., 1905. The horizontal plane of the skull and the general problem of the comparison of variable forms. Science 21 (544): 862.
3. Bookstein F. L., 1991. Morphometric Tools for Landmark Data: Geometry and Biology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
4. Bookstein, F. L., 1996. Combining the tools of geometric morphometrics. In: Marcus, L. F., Corti, M., Loy, A., Naylor, G. J. P., and Slice, D. E., (eds.), Advances in Morphometrics. Plenum Press, New York, pp. 131-151.
5. Cock, A. G., 1966. Genetical aspects of metrical growth and form in anaimals. Quaterly Review of Biology 41: 131-190.
6. Coimbra, R., Hoyt, D.B., Potenza, B.M., Fortlage, D., Hollingsworth-Fridlund, P., 2003. Does Sexual Dimorphism Influence Outcome of Traumatic Brain Injury Patients? The Answer is No! Journal of Trauma 54 (4): 689-700. (Pubitemid 36538222)
7. Dryden, I. L., and Mardia K. V., 1998. Statistical Shape Analysis. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
8. Enlow, and Hans, 1996. Essentials of Facial Growth. Saunders Company, Philadelphia.
9. Goodall, C. R., 1991. Procrustes methods in the statistical analysis of shape. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 53: 285-339.
10. Gower, J. C., 1975. Generalized Procrustes analysis. Psychometrika, 40: 33-51.
11. Gunz, P., 2001. Using Semilandmarks on Surfaces and Curves in Three Dimensions to Model Human Neurocranial Shape. Diplomarbeit zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades Magister der Naturwissenschaften an der Universität Wien.
12. Gross, M. E., 1991. "The GEBODIII Program User's Guide and Description" AL-TR-1991-0102, Armstrong Aerospace Research Laboratory, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio.
13. Haug, E., Beaugonon, M., Montmayeur, N., Marca, C., Choi, H. Y., 2003. Legal Virtual Testing for Vehicle Occupant Safety Design Using Human Models. Proceedings of the 9th HANPAM Conference and Exhibition, Seoul, Korea, November 11, 2003.
14. Howells, W. W., 1973. Cranial Variation in Man: A Study by Multivariate Analysis of Difference Among Recent Human Populations. Papers of the Peabody Museum of Archaeology and Ethnology, No. 67. Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.
15. Huxley J. S., and Tessier, G., 1936. Terminology of Relative Growth. Nature 137: 780.
16. Kendall, D. G., 1984. Shape-manifolds, Procrustean metrics and complex projective spaces. Bulletin of the London Mathematical Society, 16: 81-121.
17. Krzanowski, W. J., 1988. Principles of Multivariate Analysis. Claredon Press, Oxford.
18. Johnson, R. A., and Wichern, D. W., 1982. Applied Multivariate Statistical Analysis. Prentice-Hall Inc., Inglewood Cliffs, New Jersey.
19. Jolicoeur, P., 1963. The multivariate generalization of the allometry equation. Biometrics 19: 497-499.
20. Lieberman DE, Ross CF, Ravosa MJ., 2000. The primate cranial base: Ontogeny, function, and integration. Yearbook of Physical Anthropology 43: 117-169. (Pubitemid 32057404)
21. Manly, B. F. J., 1997. Randomization, Bootstrap and Monte Carlo Methods in Biology, 2nd Edition. Chapman & Hall/CRC, New York
22. Marcus, L. F., 1990. Traditional morphometrics. In: Rohlf, F. J., and Bookstein, F. L., (eds.), Proceedings of the Michigan morphometrics workshop. Special Publication Number 2. University of Michigan Museum of Zoology, Ann Arbor. pp. 77-122.
23. Mitteröcker, P., 2001. Assessment of Human Preadolescent Cranial Growth and its Implications for Human Evolution. Diplomarbeit zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades Magister der Naturwissenschaften an der Universität Wien.
24. Rohlf F. J., and Marcus, L. F., 1993. A revolution in morphometrics. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 8: 129-132.
25. Rohlf, F. J., and Slice, D. E., 1990. Extensions of the Procrustes method for the optimal superimposition of landmarks. Systematic Zoology 39: 40-59.
26. Rosas, A., and Bastir, M., 2002. Thin-plate spline analysis of allometry and sexual dimorphism in the human craniofacial complex. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 117: 236-245. (Pubitemid 34163545)
27. Schneider, L.W., Robbins, D.H., Pflug, M.A., and Snyder, R.G., (1983) Anthropometry of motor vehicle occupants, Vol. 2, UMTRI-83-53-2, NHTSA.
28. Slice, D. E., In Press. Modern Morphometrics. In: Slice, D. E., (ed.), Modern Morphometrics in Physical Anthropology. Kluwer Academic Publishers, New York.
29. Slice, D. E., 2001. Landmark configurations aligned by Procrustes analysis do not lie in Kendall's shape space. Systematic Biology 50 (1) 141-149.
30. Slice, D. E., Bookstein, F. L., Marcus, L. F., and Rohlf, F. J., 1996. A glossary for morphometrics. In: Marcus, L. F., Corti, M., Loy, A., Naylor, G. J. P., and Slice, D. E., (eds.), Advances in Morphometrics. Plenum Press, New York, pp. 531-551.
31. Sneath, P. H. A., 1967. Trend surface analysis of transformation grids. Journal of Zoology, London 151: 65-122.
32. Snyder, R. G., Schneider, L. W., Owings, C. L., Reynolds, H. M., Golomb, D. H., Sckork, M. A., May 1977. "Anthropometry of Infants, Children, and Youths to Age 18 for Product Safety Design" UM-HSRI-77-17, Consumer Product Safety Commission, Bethesda, Maryland.
33. Strauss, R. E., and Bookstein, F. L., 1982. The Truss: Body form reconstructions in morphometrics. Systematic Zoology 31: 113-135.
34. Thompson, D'A. W., 1942. On Growth and Form. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.