LADDER, a sketching language for user interface developers

ACM SIGGRAPH 2007 Papers - International Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages

  Hammond, Tracy ^a   Davis, Randall ^a  

^a MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

Hierarchical scene analysis; Knowledge representation; Object modeling; Object recognition; Representation languages; Representations; Shape; User centered design; Vision and scene understanding

Indexed keywords

INTERACTIVE COMPUTER GRAPHICS; KNOWLEDGE REPRESENTATION; LADDERS; MODELING LANGUAGES; OBJECT RECOGNITION; SOFTWARE DESIGN; USER CENTERED DESIGN;

HIERARCHICAL SCENE ANALYSIS; OBJECT MODEL; REPRESENTATION LANGUAGES; REPRESENTATIONS; SHAPE; VISION AND SCENE UNDERSTANDING;

USER INTERFACES;

EID: 85088177550     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1281500.1281546     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (38)

1. Alvarado C. A natural sketching environment: bringing the computer into early stages of mechanical design. Master's thesis, MIT, 2000.
2. Landay JA, Myers BA. Interactive sketching for the early stages of user interface design. In: Proceedings of CHI '95: Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1995. p. 43-50.
3. Stahovich T. Sketchit: a sketch interpretation tool for conceptual mechanism design. Technical Report, MIT AI Laboratory, 1996.
4. Hammond T, Davis R. Tahuti: a geometrical sketch recognition system for uml class diagrams, AAAI Spring Symposium on Sketch Understanding 2002; 59-68.
5. Damm CH, Hansen KM, Thomsen M. Tool support for cooperative object-oriented design: gesture based modeling on an electronic whiteboard. In: CHI 2000, CHI; 2000. p. 518-25.
6. Ideogramic, Ideogramic UML™, Ideogramic ApS, Denmark, http://www.ideogramic.com/products/, 2001.
7. Lank E, Thorley JS, Chen SJ-S. An interactive system for recognizing hand drawn UML diagrams. In: Proceedings for CASCON 2000; 2000. p. 7.
8. Lin J, Newman MW, Hong JI, Landay J. DENIM: finding a tighter fit between tools and practice for web site design. In: CHI Letters: Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI; 2000. p. 510-7.
9. Caetano A, Goulart N, Fonseca M, Jorge J. JavaSketchIt: issues in sketching the look of user interfaces, Sketch Understanding. Papers from the 2002 AAAI Spring Symposium.
10. Lecolinet E. Designing guis by sketch drawing and visual programming. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces (AVI 1998), AVI, New York: ACM Press, 1998. p. 274-6. URLciteseer. iij.nec.com/lecolinet98desigmng.html
11. Do EY-L. Vr sketchpad - create instant 3d worlds by sketching on a transparent window. In: de Vries B, van Leeuwen JP, Achten HH, editors. CAAD Futures 2001. 2001. p. 161-72.
12. Mahoney JV, Fromherz MPJ. Handling ambiguity in constraint-based recognition of stick figure sketches. SPIE Document Recognition and Retrieval IX Conference, San Jose, CA.
13. Pittman J, Smith I, Cohen P, Oviatt S, Yang T. Quickset: a multimodal interface for military simulations. Proceedings of the Sixth Conference on Computer-Generated Forces and Behavioral Representation, 1996. p. 217-24.
14. Hse H, Shilman M, Newton AR, Landay J. Sketch-based user interfaces for collaborative object-oriented modeling. Berkley CS260 Class Project (December 1999).
15. Zue, Glass, Conversational interfaces: advances and challenges. Proceedings of IEEE, 2000. p. 1166-80.
16. VoiceXML Forum, http://www.voicexml.org/specs/Voice XML-100.pdf, Voice extensible Markup Language, 1st ed. (07 March 2000).
17. Hammond T, Davis R. LADDER: a language to describe drawing, display, and editing in sketch recognition. Proceedings of the 2003 International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI).
18. Hammond T, Davis R. Automatically transforming symbolic shape descriptions for use in sketch recognition. Proceedings of the 19th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-04).
19. Rubine D. Specifying gestures by example. Computer Graphics 1991;25(4):329-37.
20. Long AC. Quill: a gesture design tool for pen-based user interfaces, Eecs department, computer science division, UC Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, December 2001.
21. Sezgin TM. Feature point detection and curve approximation for early processing in sketch recognition. Master's thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, June 2001.
22. Alvarado C, Davis R. Sketchread: a multi-domain sketch recognition engine. In: Proceedings of UIST '04, 2004. p. 23-32.
23. Friedman-Hill E, Jess, the java expert system shell. http://herzberg.ca. sandia.gov/jess, 2001.
24. Stiny G, Gips J. Shape grammars and the generative specification of painting and sculpture. In: Freiman CV, editor. Information processing, vol. 71. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1972. p. 1460-5.
25. Gips J. Computer implementation of shape grammars. NSF/MIT Workshop on Shape Computation.
26. Futrelle RP, Nikolakis N. Efficient analysis of complex diagrams using constraint-based parsing. In: ICDAR-95 (International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition), Montreal, Canada; 1995. p. 782-90.
27. Bimber O, Encarnacao LM, Stork A. A multi-layered architecture for sketch-based interaction within virtual environments. Computer and Graphics (Special Issue on Calligraphic Interfaces: Towards a New Generation of Interactive Systems) 2000; 24(6): 851-67.
28. Mahoney JV, Fromherz MPJ. Three main concerns in sketch recognition and an approach to addressing them. In: Sketch Understanding, Papers from the 2002 AAAI Spring Symposium. Stanford, CA: AAAI Press, 2002. p. 105-12.
29. Caetano A, Goulart N, Fonseca M, Jorge J. Sketching user interfaces with visual patterns. Proceedings of the First Ibero-American Symposium in Computer Graphics (SIACG02), 2002. p. 271-9.
30. Shilman M, Pasula H, Russell S, Newton R. Statistical visual language models for ink parsing. In: Sketch Understanding, Papers from the 2002 AAAI Spring Symposium. Stanford, CA: AAAI Press, 2002. p. 126-32.
31. Lee S-W. Recognizing circuit symbols with attributed graph matching. In: Baird H, Bunke H, Yamamoto K, editors. Structured document image analysis, 1992. p. 340-58.
32. Keating JP, Mason RL. Some practical aspects of covariance estimation. Pattern Recognition Letters 1985; 3(5):295-350.
33. Calhoun C, Stahovich TF, Kurtoglu T, Kara LB. Recognizing multi-stroke symbols. Sketch Understanding. Papers from the 2002 AAAI Spring Symposium, 2002. p. 15-23.
34. Gross MD, Do EY-L. Demonstrating the electronic cocktail napkin: a paper-like interface for early design. 'Common Ground' appeared in ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing (CHI), 1996. p. 5-6.
35. Jacob RJK, Deligiannidis L, Morrison S. A software model and specification language for non-WIMP = user interfaces. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 1999; 6(1): 1-46 URLciteseer.nj.nec.com/ jacob99software.html.
36. Costagliola G, Tortora G, Orefice S, Lucia D. Automatic generation of visual programming environments. IEEE Computer 1995; 56-65.
37. Veselova O. Perceptually based learning of shape descriptions. Master's thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, 2003.
38. Hammond T, Davis R. Shady: a shape description debugger for use in sketch recognition. AAAI Fall Symposium on Making Pen-Based Interaction Intelligent and Natural.