Automatically transforming symbolic shape descriptions for use in sketch recognition

Proceedings of the National Conference on Artificial Intelligence

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages 450-456

  Hammond, Tracy ^a   Davis, Randall ^a  

^a MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DOMAIN INDEPENDENT SYSTEMS; DOMAIN INFORMATION; SKETCH RECOGNITION; SYMBOLIC LANGUAGES;

AUTOMATION; MATHEMATICAL TRANSFORMATIONS; MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; PROGRAM COMPILERS; PROGRAM TRANSLATORS;

OBJECT RECOGNITION;

EID: 9444229274     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (27)

1. Alvarado, C. 2000. A natural sketching environmant: Bringing the computer into early stages of mechanical design. Master's thesis, MIT.
2. Alvarado, C. 2003. Dynamically constructed bayesian networks for sketch understanding. Proceedings of the 3nd Annual MIT Student Oxygen Workshop.
3. Bimber, O.; Encarnacao, L. M.; and Stork, A. 2000. A multi-layered architecture, for sketch-based interaction within virtual environments, Computer and Graphics: Special Issue on Calligraphic Interfaces: Towards a New Generation of Interactive Systems 24(6):851-867.
4. Caetano, A.; Goulart, N.; Fonseca, M.; and Jorge, J. 2002a. JavaS-ketchIt. Issues in sketching the look of user interfaces. Sketch Understanding, Papers from the 2002 AAAI Spring Symposium.
5. Caetano, A.; Goulart, N.; Fonseca, M.; and Jorge, J. 2002b. Sketching user interfaces with visual patterns. Proceedings of the 1st Ibero-American Symposium in Computer Graphics (SIACG02) 271-279.
6. Costagliola, G.; Tortora, G.; Orefice, S.; and Lucia, D. 1995. Automatic generation of visual programming environments. In IEEE Computer, 56-65.
7. Do, E. Y.-L. 2001. Vr sketchpad - create instant 3d worlds by sketching on a transparent window. CAAD Futures 2001, Bauke de Vries, Jos P. van Leeuwen, Henri H. Achten (eds) 161-172.
8. Friedman-Hill, E. 2001. Jess, the java expert system shell. http://herzberg.ca.sandia.gov/jess.
9. Futrelle, R. P., and Nikolakis, N. 1995. Efficient analysis of complex diagrams using constraint-based parsing, In ICDAR-95 (International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition), 782-790.
10. Gross, M. D., and Do, E. Y.-L. 1996. Demonstrating the electronic cocktail napkin: a paper-like interface for early design, 'Common Ground' appeared in ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing (CHI) 5-6.
11. Gross, M.; Zimring, C.; and Do, E. 1994. Using diagrams to access a case library of architectural designs. In Gero, J. and Sud-weeks, F., eds., Artificial Intelligence in Design '94. Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers. 129-144.
12. Hammond, T., and Davis, R. 2002. Tahuti: A geometrical sketch recognition system for uml class diagrams. AAAI Spring Symposium on Sketch Understanding 59-68.
13. Hammond, T., and Davis, R. 2003. Ladder: A language to describe drawing, display, and editing in sketch recognition. Proceedings of the 2003 International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI).
14. Hse, H.; Shilman, M.; Newton, A. R.; and Landay, J. 1999. Sketch-based user interfaces for collaborative object-oriented modeling. Berkley CS260 Class Project.
15. Jacob, R. J. K.; Deligiannidis, L.; and Morrison, S. 1999. A software model and specification language for non-WIMP= user interfaces. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 6(1):1-46.
16. Lecolinet, E. 1998. Designing guis by sketch drawing and visual programming. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces (AVI 1998)., 274-276. AVI.
17. Lin, J.; Newman, M. W.; Hong, J. I.; and Landay, J. 2000. Denim: Finding a tighter fit between tools and practice for web site design. In CHI Letters: Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI 2000, 510-517.
18. Long, A. C. 2001. Quill: a Gesture Design Tool for Pen-based User Interfaces. Eecs department, computer science division, U.C. Berkeley, Berkeley, California.
19. Mahoney, J. V., and Fromherz, M. P. J. 2002. Handling ambiguity in constraint-based recognition of stick figure sketches. SPIE Document Recognition and Retrieval IX Conf., San Jose, CA.
20. Mahoney, J. V., and Frommerz, M. P. J. 2002. Three main concerns in sketch recognition and an approach to addressing them. In Sketch Understanding, Papers from the 2002 AAAI Spring Symposium, 105-112. Stanford, California: AAAI Press.
21. Pittman, J.; Smith, I.; Cohen, P.; Oviatt, S.; and Yang, T. 1996. Quickset: A multimodal interface for military simulations. Proceedings of the 6th Conference on Computer-Generated Forces and Behavioral Representation 217-224.
22. Rubine, D. 1991. Specifying gestures by example. In Computer Graphics, volume 25(4), 329-337.
23. Sezgin, T. M. 2001. Feature point detection and curve approximation for early processing in sketch recognition. Master's thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
24. Sezgin, T. M. 2003. Recognition efficiency issues for freehand sketches. Proceedings of the 3nd Annual MIT Student Oxygen Workshop.
25. Stiny, G., and Gips, J. 1972. Shape grammars and the generative specification of painting and sculpture. In Freiman, C. V., ed., Information Processing 71. North-Holland. 1460-1465.
26. Veselova, O. 2003. Perceptually based learning of shape descriptions. Master's thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
27. Zue, and Glass. 2000. Conversational interfaces: Advances and challenges. Proc IEEE 1166-1180.