The innovation policy mix

Handbook of Innovation Policy Impact

Volumn , Issue , 2016, Pages 505-542

  Cunningham, Paul ^a   Edler, Jakob ^a   Flanagan, Kieron ^b   Larédo, Philippe ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85087671445     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (57)

1. Arnold, E. (2011), International Audit of Research, Development and Innovation in the Czech Republic: Synthesis Report, Brighton: Technopolis Group.
2. Aschhoff, B. and W. Sofka (2009), 'Innovation on demand: Can public procurement drive market success of innovations?', Research Policy, 38 (8), 1235-1247.
3. Bérubé, C. and P. Mohnen (2009), 'Are firms that receive R&D subsidies more innovative?', Canadian Journal of Economics, 42 (1), 206-225.
4. Borrás, S. and C. Edquist (2013), The Choice of Innovation Policy Instruments, CIRCLE Working Paper No. 2013/04, available at http://www.circle.lu.se/?wpfb_dl=5.
5. Branscomb, L.M. and R. Florida (1998), 'Challenges to technology policy', in L.M. Branscomb and J.H. Keller (eds), Investing in Innovation: Creating a Research and Innovation Policy That Works, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 3-39.
6. Bressers, H.A. and L.J. O'Toole (2005), 'Instrument selection and implementation in a networked context', in P. Eliadis, M. Hill and M. Howlett (eds), Designing Government: From Instruments to Governance, Montreal: McGill-Queens University Press, pp. 132-184.
7. Buen, J. (2006), 'Danish and Norwegian wind industry: The relationship between policy instruments, innovation and diffusion', Energy Policy, 34 (18), 3887-3897.
8. Carboni, O.A. (2011), 'R&D subsidies and private R&D expenditures: Evidence from Italian manufacturing data', International Review of Applied Economics, 25 (4), 419-439.
9. Colinet, L., P.-B. Joly, A. Gaunand, M. Matt, P. Larédo and S. Lemarié (2014), ASIRPA: Analyse des impacts de la recherche publique agronomique-Rapport final, Paris: INRA.
10. Corchuelo, B. and E. Martínez-Ros (2009), 'The effects of fiscal incentives for R&D in Spain', Business Economics Working Paper No. wb092302, Universidad Carlos III, Departamento de Economía de la Empresa.
11. Cowling, M. (2010), Economic Evaluation of the Small Firms Loan Guarantee (SFLG) Scheme, Brighton: Institute for Employment Studies.
12. CSES (2011), Final Evaluation of the Lead Market Initiative (Final Report): Framework Service Contract for the Procurement of Studies and Other Supporting Services on Commission Impact Assessments and Evaluations-Interim, Final and Ex-post Evaluations of Policies, Oxford: Centre for Strategy and Evaluation Services.
13. Cunningham, P.N., L. Buisson, T. Alslev Christensen, M. Koskenlinna, R. Predescu and C. Seiser (2007), CREST 3% OMC Science and Innovation Policy Mix Peer Review: United Kingdom, European Parliament.
14. Cunningham, P.N., W. Crasemann, P. Lehto, O. Starzer and A. van der Zwaan (2012), Peer-review of the Danish Research and Innovation System: Strengthening Innovation Performance, Expert Group Report prepared for the European Research Area Committee, Brussels: European Commission.
15. David, P.A., B.H. Hall and A.A. Toole (2000), 'Is public R&D a complement or substitute for private R&D? A review of the econometric evidence', Research Policy, 29 (4-5), 497-529.
16. Edler, J. and S. Hafner (2007), 'Nachfrageorientierte Innovationspolitik in Schweden', in J. Edler (ed.), Bedürfnisse als Innovationsmotor: Konzepte und Instrumente nachfrageorientierter Innovationspolitik, Berlin: Edition Sigma.
17. ETAN Expert Working Group (1998), Climate Change and the Challenge for Research and Technological Development (RTD) Policy, ETAN Working Paper (Directorate General XII, Directorate D-Environment and Climate RTD Programme, Directorate AS-RTD Actions: Strategy and Coordination; Directorate General Joint Research Center, Institute for Prospective Technological Studies).
18. Falk, R. (2009), The Coherence of the Instrument Mix, Report No. 8 in the context of the Study: Evaluation of Government Funding in RTDI from a Systems Perspective in Austria, Vienna: Austrian Institute of Economic Research.
19. Farre-Barbosa, L., E. Lhoste and F. Gibelli (2013), 'ADEME et l'accompagnement de l'innovation énergétique', Report for the master course on research and innovation policy, Ecole des Ponts, Paris.
20. Flanagan, K., E. Uyarra and M. Laranja (2010), The 'Policy Mix' for Innovation: Re-thinking Innovation Policy in a Multi-level, Multi-actor Context, Manchester Institute of Innovation Research Working Paper Series, available at https://www.escholar.manchester.ac.uk/uk-ac-man-scw:82698.
21. Flanagan, K., E. Uyarra and M. Laranja (2011), 'Reconceptualising the "policy mix" for innovation', Research Policy, 40 (5), 702-713.
22. Geller, H. and S. Nadel (1994), 'Market transformation strategies to promote end-use efficiency', Annual Review of Energy and the Environment, 19, 301-346.
23. Grilli, L. and S. Murtinu (2012), 'Do public subsidies affect the performance of new technology-based firms? The importance of evaluation schemes and agency goals', Prometheus, 30 (1), 97-111.
24. Guerzoni, M. and E. Raiteri (2012), 'Innovative procurement and R&D subsidies: Compounding effects and new empirical evidence on technological policies in a quasi-experimental setting', Bureau of Research in Innovation, Complexity and Knowledge, University of Turin.
25. Gunningham, N. and D. Sinclair (1999), 'Regulatory pluralism: Designing policy mixes for environmental protection', Law and Policy, 21 (1), 49-76.
26. Guy, K., L. Georghiou, P. Quintas, H. Cameron, M. Hobday and T. Ray (1991), Evaluation of the Alvey Programme for Advanced Information Technology, London: HMSO.
27. Guy, K., P. Boekholt, P. Cunningham, R. Hofer, C. Nauwelaers and C. Rammer (2009), Designing Policy Mixes: Enhancing Innovation System Performance and R&D Investment Levels: Final Report, The 'Policy Mix' Project: Monitoring and Analysis of Policies and Public Financing Instruments Conducive to Higher Levels of R&D Investments, Brussels: European Commission, DG Research.
28. Heimer, T., T. Fischer, J. Trepermann, D. Mannfeld, T. Reiß, R. Lindner, K. Blind and M. Weber (2011), Begleitforschung der Hightech-Strategie-Analyse zu ausgewählten Aspekten: Zwischenbericht, Frankfurt.
29. Henriques, L. and P. Larédo (2013), 'Policy-making in science policy: The "OECD model" unveiled', Research Policy, 42 (3), 801-816.
30. Hofer, R. and M. Dinges (2008), R&D-R&D Policy Interaction: Thematic Report, Brussels: Joanneum Research.
31. Howlett, M. (2005), 'What is a policy instrument? Policy tools, policy mixes, and policy-implementation styles', in P. Eliadis, M.M. Hill and M. Howlett (eds), Designing Government: From Instruments to Governance, Montreal: McGill-Queens University Press, pp. 31-50.
32. Johnstone, N., I. Hascic and D. Popp (2010), 'Renewable energy policies and technological innovation: Evidence based on patent counts', Environmental and Resource Economics, 45 (1), 133-155.
33. Kay, A. (2006), The Dynamics of Public Policy: Theory and Evidence, Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar.
34. Laat, B. de, K. Warta and K. Williams (2001), Evaluation of ANVAR's 'Procédure d'aide au projet d'innovation, Paris: Technopolis Group.
35. Lambert, R. (2003), Lambert Review of Business-University Collaboration, Norwich: HM Treasury.
36. Lhuillery, S., M. Marino and P. Parrotta (2013), 'Evaluation de l'impact des aides directes et indirectes à la R&D en France', Report for Ministère de l'enseignement supérieur et de la recherche, December, Paris.
37. Manchester Institute of Innovation Research, Atlantis Consulting, ISI-Fraunhofer, Joanneum Research and Wise Guys (2010), INNO-Appraisal: Understanding Evaluation of Innovation Policy in Europe, Final Report, Pro-INNO Europe, Commission of the European Communities, Manchester: University of Manchester, Manchester Institute of Innovation Research.
38. MENESR (2014), L'état de l'enseignement supérieur et de la recherche en France: 47 indicateurs, Ministère de l'Éducation nationale, de l'Enseignement supérieur et de la Recherche, available at http://publication.enseignementsup-recherche.gouv.fr/eesr/7/info.php.
39. Mulkay, B. and J. Mairesse (2013), 'The R&D tax credit in France: Assessment and ex ante evaluation of the 2008 reform', Oxford Economic Papers, 65 (3), 746-766.
40. Mundell, R. (1962), The Appropriate Use of Monetary and Fiscal Policy for Internal and External Stability, IMF Staff Papers, Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.
41. Neij, L. (1998), 'Evaluation of Swedish market transformation programmes', Lund University, Department of Energy and Environmental Energy Systems Studies.
42. Neij, L. (2001), 'Methods of evaluating market transformation programmes: Experience in Sweden', Energy Policy, 29 (1), 67-79.
43. NUTEK (1994), Effective Market Influence: An Effect Chain Analysis of NUTEK's High Frequency Lighting Campaign, Stockholm: NUTEK.
44. OECD (2010a), 'The innovation policy mix', in OECD (ed.), OECD Science, Technology and Industry Outlook 2010, Paris: OECD Publishing, pp. 251-279.
45. OECD (2010b), The OECD Innovation Strategy: Getting a Head Start on Tomorrow, Paris: OECD Publishing.
46. OECD (2011), Demand Side Innovation Policies, Paris: OECD Publishing.
47. OECD (2014), OECD Reviews of Innovation Policy: France 2014, Paris: OECD Publishing.
48. PACEC (2011), Evaluation of the Collaborative Research and Development Programmes: Final Report, Cambridge: PACEC.
49. PREST (2003), Evaluation of National Research and Development Programme for Medical and Welfare Apparatus, Final report for the Japanese Ministry for Economy, Trade and Industry, Manchester: PREST.
50. Rammer, C. (2008), Monitoring and Analysis of Policies and Public Financing Instruments Conducive to Higher Levels of R&D Investments: The 'Policy Mix' Project, Case Study Germany, Brussels: European Commission, DG Research.
51. Smith, K. (1994), New Directions in Research and Technology Policy: Identifying the Key Issues, STEP report, Oslo.
52. Sorrel, S. and J. Sijm (2003), 'Carbon trading in the policy mix', Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 19 (3), 420-437.
53. SQW Consulting (2009), Synthesis of Evaluation Evidence: Final Report for the Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform, London: BIS.
54. Suvilehto, H.-M. and E. Överholm (1998), Swedish Procurement and Market Activities: Different Design Solutions on Different Markets, ACEEE, available at http://aceee.org/files/proceedings/1998/data/papers/0727.PDF.
55. Veugelers, R. (2009), Evaluation of the Finnish National Innovation System, Helsinki: Ministry of Education and Ministry of Employment and the Economy.
56. Westmore, B. (2013), R&D, Patenting and Growth: The Role of Public Policy, OECD Economics Department Working Paper No. 1047, Paris: OECD Publishing.
57. Zhu, P., W. Xu and N. Lundin (2006), 'The impact of government's fundings and tax incentives on industrial R&D investments: Empirical evidences from industrial sectors in Shanghai', China Economic Review, 17 (1), 51-69.