High precision touch screen interaction

Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2003, Pages 105-112

  Albinsson, Pär Anders ^a,c   Zhai, Shumin ^b,c  

^a SWEDISH DEFENCE RESEARCH AGENCY   (Sweden)

^b IBM ALMADEN RESEARCH CENTER   (United States)

^c LINKÖPING UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Touch screens

Indexed keywords

HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; ITERATIVE METHODS; USER INTERFACES; VIRTUAL REALITY;

TOUCH SCREENS;

TACTILE READING AIDS;

EID: 85087534810     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/642629.642631     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. Accot, J. and S. Zhai. More than dotting the i's - foundations for crossing-based interfaces. Proc. CHI 2002. p. 73-80.
2. Beaudouin-Lafon, M. Instrumental Interaction: An Interaction Model for Designing Post-WIMP User Interfaces. Proc. CHI 2000. p. 446-453.
3. Bederson, B.B. and J.D. Hollan. PAD++: Zooming graphical interface for exploring alternative interface physics. Proc. UIST. 1994. p. 17-26.
4. Card, S.K., W.K. English, and B.J. Burr, Evaluation of mouse, rate controlled isometric joystick, step keys and text keys for text selection on a CRT. Ergonomics, 1978. 21: p. 601-613.
5. Fitts, P.M., The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1954. 47: p. 381-391.
6. Furnas, G.W. and B.B. Bederson. Space-scale diagrams: understanding multiscale interfaces. Proc. CHI 1995. p. 234-241.
7. Guiard, Y., M. Beaudouin-Lafon, and D. Mottet. Navigation as multiscale pointing: Extending fitts' model to very high precision tasks. Proc. CHI 1999. p. 450-457.
8. Guiard, Y., F. Gourgeouis, D. Mottet, and M. Beaudouin-Lafon. Beyond the 10-bit barrier: Fitts' law in multi-scale electronic worlds. Proc. People and Computers XV: Joint Conference of IHM 2001 and HCI 2001. 2001: Springer. p. 573-587.
9. Hombæk, K., B. Bederson, and C. Plaisant, Navigation patterns and usability of zoomable user interfaces with and without an overview. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, in press.
10. ISO, ISO 9241-9 Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals (VDTs) - Part 9: Requirements for non-keyboard input devices, 2000, International Organization for Standardization.
11. Leahy, M. and D. Hix. Effect of touch screen target location on user accuracy. Proc. The Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting. 1990. p. 370-374.
12. MacKenzie, I.S., Fitts' law as a research and design tool in human computer interaction. Human Computer Interaction, 1992. 7: p. 91-139.
13. Potter, R.L., L.J. Weldon, and B. Shneiderman. Improving the accuracy of touch screens: an experimental evaluation of three strategies. Proc. CHI, 1988. p. 27-32.
14. Ren, X. and S. Moriya, Improving selection performance on pen-based systems: A study of pen-input interaction for selection tasks. ACM Transactions on Computer Human Interaction, 2000. 7(3): p. 384-416.
15. Schultz, K., D.Batten, and T. Sluchak, Optimal viewing angle for touch-screen displays: Is there such a thing? International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 1998. 22: p.343-350.
16. Sears, A. and B. Shneiderman, High Precision Touch-screens: Design Strategies and Comparison with a Mouse. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 1991. 43(4): p. 593-613.
17. Shneiderman, B., Touch screens now offer compelling uses. IEEE Software, 1991. 8(2): p. 93-94, 107.
18. Zhai, S., On the Validity of Throughput as a Characteristic of Computer Input, IBM Research Report RJ 10253, 2002, IBM Almaden Research Center: San Jose, California.