Optimal viewing angle for touch-screen displays: Is there such a thing?

International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics

Volumn 22, Issue 4-5, 1998, Pages 343-350

  Schultz, Kevin L ^a   Batten, David M ^a   Sluchak, Thomas J ^a  

^a Department CHLA/Building 645 ^*

Author keywords

Anthropometry; Touch screens; Visual displays

Indexed keywords

ANTHROPOMETRY; COMPUTER WORKSTATIONS; DISPLAY DEVICES; HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; VISION;

TOUCH SCREEN DISPLAYS;

ERGONOMICS;

ANTHROPOMETRY; ARTICLE; BODY HEIGHT; BODY POSITION; CATERING SERVICE; COMMERCIAL PHENOMENA; COMPUTER INTERFACE; CONSUMER; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MAN MACHINE INTERACTION; OPERATOR; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; VISUAL DISPLAY UNIT;

EID: 0032212120     PISSN: 01698141     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0169-8141(97)00087-5     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. Beringer D.B., Peterson J.G. Underlying behavioral parameters of the operation of touch-input devices. Biases, models, and feedback Human Factors. 27(4):1985;445-458.
2. ®. 1974;MIT Press, Cambridge.
3. Hall A.D., Cunningham J.B., Roache R.P., Cox J.W. Factors affecting performance using touch-entry systems. Tactual recognition fields and system accuracy Journal of Applied Psychology. 73(4):1988;711-720.
4. Miles, A.W., Underwood, H.D., 1986. Touch force profiles as related to touch sensitive displays. Technical Report No. 29.0648. International Business Machine Corporation, Raleigh, NC.
5. Plaisant, C., Sears, A., 1992. Touchscreen interfaces for alphnumeric data. Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 36th Annual Meeting, pp. 293-297.
6. Povlotsky, B., Dubrovsky, V., 1988. 'Recommended' versus 'preferred' in design and use of computer workstations. Proceedings of the Human Factors Society, 32nd Annual Meeting, pp. 501-505.
7. Sears A. Improving touchscreen keyboards. Design issues and a comparison with other devices Interacting with Computers. 3(3):1991;251-269.