The relevance of risk to wrongdoing

The Good, the Right, Life and Death: Essays in Honor of Fred Feldman

Volumn , Issue , 2017, Pages 151-170

  Zimmerman, Michael J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT GREENSBORO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85087269792     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781315239323-9     Document Type: Chapter

References (41)

1. Åqvist, Lennart (1967), ‘Good Samaritans, Contrary-to-Duty Imperatives, and Epistemic Obligations,’Noûs, Vol. 1, pp. 361-79.
2. Brandt, Richard (1959), Ethical Theory, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs.
3. Broad, C. D. (1934), Five Types of Ethical Theory, Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner & Co., London.
4. Bykvist, Krister (2002), ‘Alternative Actions and the Spirit of Consequentialism,’Philosophical Studies, Vol. 107, pp. 45-68.
5. Carlson, Erik (1995), Consequentialism Reconsidered, Kluwer, Dordrecht.
6. Ellsberg, Daniel (1961), ‘Risk, Ambiguity, and the Savage Axioms,’ in Gardenfors and Sahlin (1988a), pp. 245-69.
7. Feldman, Fred (1986), Doing the Best We Can, Reidel, Dordrecht.
8. Feldman, Fred (1987), ‘The Paradox of the Knower,’Philosophical Studies, Vol. 55, pp. 93-100.
9. Feldman, Fred (1988), ‘Concerning the Paradox of Moral Reparation and Other Matters,’Philosophical Studies, Vol. 57, pp. 23-39.
10. Feldman, Fred (1990), ‘A Simpler Solution to the Paradoxes of Deontic Logic,’Philosophical Perspectives, Vol. 4, pp. 309-41.
11. Gärdenfors, Peter and Sahlin, Nils-Eric (1982), ‘Unreliable Probabilities, Risk Taking, and Decision Making,’ in Gärdenfors and Sahlin (1988a), pp. 313-34.
12. Gärdenfors, Peter and Sahlin, Nils-Eric, eds. (1988a), Decision, Probability, and Utility, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
13. Gärdenfors, Peter and Sahlin, Nils-Eric (1988b), ‘Introduction: Bayesian Decision Theory -Foundations and Problems,’ in Gärdenfors and Sahlin (1988a), pp. 1-15.
14. Goble, Lou (1993), ‘The Logic of Obligation, “Better” and “Worse”,’Philosophical Studies, Vol. 70, pp. 133-63.
15. Goble, Lou (1996), ‘Utilitarian Deontic Logic,’Philosophical Studies, Vol. 82, pp. 317-57.
16. Goldman, Holly S. (1976), ‘Dated Rightness and Moral Imperfection,’Philosophical Review, Vol. 85, pp. 449-87.
17. Goldman, Holly S. (1978), ‘Doing the Best One Can,’ in Values and Morals, edited by Alvin I. Goldman and Jaegwon Kim (Reidel, Dordrecht), pp. 185-214.
18. Greenspan, Patricia S. (1978), ‘Oughts and Determinism: A Response to Goldman,’Philosophical Review, Vol. 87, pp. 77-83.
19. Gruzalski, Bart (1981), ‘Foreseeable Consequence Utilitarianism,’Australasian Journal of Philosophy, Vol. 59, pp. 163-76.
20. Humberstone, I. L. (1983), ‘The Background of Circumstances,’Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, Vol. 64, pp. 19-34.
21. Jackson, Frank (1991), ‘Decision-theoretic Consequentialism and the Nearest and Dearest Objection,’Ethics, Vol. 101, pp. 461-82.
22. Jackson, Frank and Pargetter, Robert (1986), ‘Oughts, Options, and Actualism,’Philosophical Review, Vol. 95, pp. 233-55.
23. Kahneman, Daniel and Tversky, Amos (1979), ‘Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk,’ in Gärdenfors and Sahlin (1988a), pp. 183-214.
24. Lemmon, E. J. (1962), ‘Moral Dilemmas,’Philosophical Review, Vol. 70, pp. 139-58.
25. Marcus, Ruth Barcan (1980), ‘Moral Dilemmas and Consistency,’Journal of Philosophy, Vol. 77, pp. 121-36.
26. McClennen, Edward F. (1983), ‘Sure-thing Doubts,’ in Gärdenfors and Sahlin (1988a), pp. 166-82.
27. Moore, G. E. (1912), Ethics, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
28. Nowell Smith, P. H. (1960), Tfs and Cans,’ Theoria, Vol. 32(2), pp. 85-101.
29. Rescher, Nicholas (1983), Risk, University Press of America, Lanham.
30. Russell, Bertrand (1966), Philosophical Essays, Simon and Schuster, New York.
31. Savage, Leonard J. (1953), ‘Allais’ Paradox,’ in Gärdenfors and Sahlin (1988a), pp. 163-65.
32. Smart, J. J. C. (1973), ‘An Outline of a System of Utilitarian Ethics,’ in Utilitarianism: For and Against, by J. J. C. Smart and Bernard Williams (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge), pp. 1-74.
33. Sobel, Jordan Howard (1976), ‘Utilitarianism and Past and Future Mistakes,’Noûs, Vol. 10, pp. 195-219.
34. Sosa, David (1993), ‘Consequences of Consequentialism,’Mind, Vol. 102, pp. 101-22.
35. Thomason, Richmond H. (1981), ‘Deontic Logic and the Role of Freedom in Moral Deliberation,’ in New Studies in Deontic Logic, edited by Risto Hilpinen (Reidel, Dordrecht), pp. 177-86.
36. van Fraassen, Bas C. (1973), ‘Values and the Heart’s Commands,’Journal of Philosophy, Vol. 70, pp.5-19.
37. Vorobej, Mark (2000), ‘Prosaic Possibilism,’Philosophical Studies, Vol. 97, pp. 131-36.
38. Williams, Bernard (1973), ‘Ethical Consistency,’ in Problems of the Self, by Bernard Williams (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge), pp. 166-86.
39. Wolf, Susan (1982), ‘Moral Saints,’Journal of Philosophy, Vol. 79, pp. 419-39.
40. Zimmerman, Michael J. (1996), The Concept of Moral Obligation, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
41. Zimmerman, Michael J. (1997), 'A Plea for Accuses,'American Philosophical Quarterly, Vol. 34, pp. 229-43.