A quandary for school leaders equity, high-stakes testing and accountability

Handbook of Research on Educational Leadership for Equity and Diversity

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 409-435

  Heilig, Julian Vasquez ^a   Nichols, Sharon L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85087266299     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203076934-28     Document Type: Chapter

References (128)

1. Achieve, Inc. (2005). NAEP vs. state proficiency 2005. Retrieved from http://www.achieve.org/node/482.
2. Achinstein, B., Ogawa, R. T., & Speiglman, A. (2004). Are we creating separate and unequal tracks of teachers? The effects of state policy, local conditions, and teacher characteristics on new teacher socialization. American Educational Research Journal, 41(3), 557–603.
3. Allington, R., & McGill-Franzen, A. (1992). Unintended effects of educational reform in New York. Educational Policy, 6(4), 397–414.
4. Amrein, A. L., & Berliner, D. C. (2002). High-stakes testing, uncertainty, and student learning. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 10(18). Retrieved from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v10n18/.
5. Amrein-Beardsley, A., Berliner, D. C. & Rideau, S. (2010). Cheating in the first, second, and third degree: Educators’ responses to high-stakes testing. Educational Policy Analysis Archives, 18(14). Retrieved from http://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/714
6. Anderson, J. D. (2004). The historical context for understanding the test score gap. National Journal of Urban Education and Practice, 1(1), 1–21.
7. Aronowitz, S., & Giroux, H. A. (1985). Education under siege: The conservative, liberal and radical debate over schooling. London: Bergin & Garvey.
8. Berliner, D. C. (2009). Rational response to highstakes testing and the special case of narrowing the curriculum. Paper presented at the International Conference on Redesigning Pedagogy, National Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore.
9. Berliner, D. C., & Biddle, B. J. (1995). The manufactured crisis: Myths, fraud, and the attack on America’s public school. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
10. Binet, A., & Simon, T. (1916). The development of intelligence in children. Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins.
11. Blanton, C. K. (2004). The strange career of bilingual education in Texas, 1836–1981. College Station: Texas A&M University Press.
12. Boake, C. (2002). From the Binet-Simon to the Wechsler-Bellevue: Tracing the history of intelligence testing. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Psychology, 24, 383–405.
13. Campbell, D. (1975). Assessing the impact of planned social change. In G. Lyons (Ed.), Social research and public policies: The Dartmouth/OECD conference (pp. 3–45). Hanover, NH: Public Affairs Center, Dartmouth College.
14. Carnoy, M., & Loeb, S. (2003). Does external accountability affect student outcomes? A crossstate analysis? Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 24, 305–331.
15. Carnoy, M., Loeb, S., & Smith, T. (2001). Do higherstate test scores in Texas make for better high school outcomes? (CPRE Research Report, No. RR-047). Philadelphia, PA: Consortium for Policy Research in Education. ERIC ED47884.
16. Chapman, L. (2007). An update on No Child Left Behind and national trends in education. Arts Education Policy Review, 109(1), 25–36.
17. Chapman, P. (1981). Schools as sorters: Testing and tracking in California, 1910–1925. Journal of Social History, 14, 701–717.
18. Cizek, G. J. (1999). Cheating on tests: How to do it, detect it, and prevent it. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
19. Cohen, D. (1996). Standards-based school reform: Policy, practice, and performance. In H. F. Ladd (Ed.), Holding schools accountable (pp. 99–127). Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
20. Cuban, L. (1988). Constancy and change in schools, 1880 to present. In P. Jackson (Ed.), Contributing to educational change (pp. 85–104). Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.
21. Cullen, J., & Reback, R. (2006). Tinkering toward accolades: School gaming under a performance accountability system (NBER Working Paper No. 12286). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
22. Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. New York, NY: Macmillan.
23. Edmonson, A. (2003, September 21). Exams test educator integrity—Emphasis on scores can lead to cheating, teacher survey finds. The Commercial Appeal.
24. Falsgraf, C. (2008). The ecology of assessment. Language and Teaching, 42(4), 491–503.
25. Figlio, D. N. (2006). Testing, crime, and punishment. Journal of Public Economics, 90(4–5), 837–851.
26. Figlio, D., & Getzler, L. (2002). Accountability, ability and disability: Gaming the system? (NBER Working Paper No. 9307). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
27. Figlio, D., & Winicki, J. (2004). Food for thought: The effects of school accountability plans on school nutrition. Journal of Public Economics, 89, 381–394.
28. Gamson, D. (2007). Historical perspectives on democratic decision making in education: Paradigms, paradoxes, and promises. In P. A. Moss (Ed.), Evidence and decision making: The 106th yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part 1 (pp. 15–45). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
29. Giordano, G. (2005). How testing came to dominate American schools: The history of educational assessment. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
30. Glass, G. V. (2003). Standards and criteria redux (Rev. ed.). Retrieved from http://glass.ed.asu.edu/gene/papers/standards/.
31. Glass, G. V. (2008). Fertilizers, pills, and magnetic strips: The fate of public education in America. Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
32. Gould, S. J. (1996). The mismeasure of man. New York, NY: Norton.
33. Grissmer, D., & Flanagan, A. (1998). Exploring rapid achievement gains in North Carolina and Texas: Lessons from the states. Washington, DC: National Education Goals Panel.
34. Grubb, N. (1985). The initial effects of House Bill 72 on Texas public schools: The challenges of equity and effectiveness. Austin, TX: Lyndon B. Johnson School of Public Affairs.
35. Haney, W. (2000). The myth of the Texas miracle in education. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 8(41). Retrieved from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v8n41/
36. Herman, J. L., & Haertel, E. H. (Eds.). (2005). Uses and misuses of data for educational accountability and improvement: The 104th yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part 2. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
37. Hollinger, R. C., & Lanza-Kaduce, L. (1996). Academic dishonesty and the perceived effectiveness of countermeasures: An empirical survey of cheating at a major public university. NASPA Journal, 33, 292–306.
38. Jacob, B. (2002). Accountability, incentives and behavior: The impact of high-stakes testing in the Chicago public schools. (NBER Working Paper No. 8968). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
39. Jacob, B. (2005). Accountability, incentives and behavior: The impact of high-stakes testing in the Chicago Public Schools. Journal of Public Economics, 89(5–6), 761–796.
40. Jacob, B., & Levitt, S. (2002a). Rotten apples: An investigation of the prevalence and predictors of teacher cheating (NBER Working Paper No. 9413). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research. Retrieved from http://www.nber.org/papers/w9413/
41. Jacob, B., & Levitt, S. (2002b). Catching cheating teachers: The results of an unusual experiment in implementing theory (NBER Working Paper No. 94149). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research. Retrieved from http://www.nber.org/papers/w9414/.
42. Jencks, C., & Phillips, M. (Eds.). (1998). The Black-White test score gap. Washington, DC: Brookings Institute Press.
43. Jennings, J., & Beveridge, A. (2009). How does test exemption affect schools’ and students’ academic performance? Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 31(2), 153–175.
44. Jensen, L. A., Arnett, J. J., Feldman, S., & Cauffman, E. (2002). It’s wrong, but everybody does it: Academic dishonesty among high school and college students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 27, 209–228.
45. Johnson, R. (2008, October). Texas public school attrition study, 2007–08: At current pace, schools will lose many more generations. IDRA Newsletter. Retrieved from http://www.idra.org/newsletterplus/October_2008/
46. Jones, B., & Egley, R. (2004). Voices from the frontlines: Teachers’ perceptions of high-stakes testing. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 12(39). Retrieved from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v12n39/.
47. Jones, M. G., Jones, B., & Hargrove, T. (2003). The unintended consequences of high-stakes testing. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
48. Klein, S. P., Hamilton, L. S., McCaffrey, D. F., & Stecher, M. B. (2000). What do test scores in Texas tell us? (Issue Paper). Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
49. Kossan, P. (2005, May 13). State deems failing grades good enough to pass AIMS. Arizona Republic. Retrieved from http://www.azcentral.com/arizonarepublic/news/articles/0513scores13.html.
50. Labaree, D. F. (2005). Progressivism, schools and schools of education: An American romance. Paedagogica Historica, 41, 275–288
51. Linn, R. L., Graue, M. E., & Sanders, N. M. (1990). Comparing state and district test results to national norms: The validity of claims that “everyone is above average.” Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 9(3), 5–14.
52. Linton T. H., & Kester, D. (2003, March 14). Exploring the achievement gap between white and minority students in Texas: A comparison of the 1996 and 2000 NAEP and TAAS eighth grade mathematics test results. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 11(10). Retrieved from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v11n10/
53. Lipman, P. (2004). High stakes education: Inequality, globalization and urban school reform. New York, NY: RoutledgeFarmer.
54. Losen, D., Orfield, G., & Balfanz, R. (2006). Confronting the graduation rate crisis in Texas. Cambridge, MA: The Civil Rights Project at Harvard University.
55. Lynd, R. S., & Lynd, H. M. (1929). Middletown: A study in modern American culture. New York: Harcourt, Brace.
56. Mazzeo, C. (2001). Frameworks of state: Assessment policy in historical perspective. Teachers College Record, 103(3), 367–397.
57. McCabe, D. L., & Trevino, L. K. (1997). Individual and contextual influences on academic dishonesty: A multicampus investigation. Research in Higher Education, 38, 379–396.
58. McCaslin, M. (1996). The problem of problem representation: The Summit’s conception of student. Educational Researcher, 25, 13–15.
59. McCaslin, M. (2006). Student motivational dynamics in the era of school reform. Elementary School Journal, 106, 479–490.
60. McDonnell, L. (2005). Assessment and accountability from the policymaker’s perspective. In J. L. Herman & E. H. Haertel (Eds.), Uses and misuses of data for educational accountability and improvement: The 104th yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part 2 (pp. 35‒54). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
61. McNeil, L. (2000). Contradictions of school reform: Educational costs of standardized testing. New York, NY: Routledge.
62. McNeil, L. (2005). Faking equity: High-stakes testing and the education of Latino youth. In A. Valenzuela (Eds.), Leaving children behind: How “Texas-style” accountability fails Latino youth (pp. 57‒112). Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
63. McNeil, L. M., Coppola, E., Radigan, J., & Vasquez Heilig, J. (2008). Avoidable losses: High-stakes accountability and the dropout crisis. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 16(3). Retrieved from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v16n3/
64. McNeil, L. M., & Valenzuela, A. (2001). The harmful impact of the TAAS system of testing in Texas: Beneath the accountability rhetoric. In M. Kornhaber & G. Orfield (Eds.), Raising standards or raising barriers? Inequality and high century foundation (pp. 127–150). New York, NY: Century Foundation Press.
65. Mellon, E. (2010, June 7). Qualms arise over TAKS standards. The Houston Chronicle.
66. Moss, P. A. (2007) (Ed.). Evidence and decision making: The 106th yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part 1. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
67. Murdock, T. B., & Anderman, E. M. (2006). Motivational perspective on student cheating: Toward an integrated model of academic dishonesty. Educational Psychologist, 41(3), 129–145.
68. National Commission for Excellence in Education. (1983). A nation at risk: The imperatives for educational reform. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Commission for Excellence in Education.
69. Nichols, S., & Berliner, D. C. (2007a). Collateral damage: How high-stakes testing corrupts America’s schools. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Educational Press.
70. Nichols, S., & Berliner, D. C. (2007b). The pressure to cheat in a high-stakes testing environment. In E. M. Anderman & T. B. Murdock (Eds.), Psychology of academic cheating (pp. 289–312). New York, NY: Elsevier.
71. Nichols, S. L., Glass, G. V, & Berliner, D. C. (2006). High-stakes testing and student achievement: Does accountability pressure increase student learning? Education Policy Analysis Archives, 14(1). Retrieved from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v14n1/.
72. Nichols, S. L., & Good, T. (2004). America’s teenagers—Myths and realities: Media images, schooling, and the social costs of careless indifference. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
73. Public Law PL 107-110, the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001.
74. Orel, S. (2003). Left behind in Birmingham: 522 pushed-out students. In R. Cossett Lent & G. Pipkin (Eds.), Silent no more: Voices of courage in American schools (pp. 1–14). Portsmouth, NJ: Heinemann.
75. Orfield, G., & Kornhaber, M. L. (Eds.). (2001). Raising standards or raising barriers? Inequality and high stakes testing in public education. New York, NY: The Century Foundation Press.
76. Orfield, G., Losen, D., Wald, J., & Swanson, C. B. (2004). Losing our future: How minority youth are being left behind by the graduation rate crisis. Cambridge, MA: The Civil Rights Project at Harvard University.
77. Pedulla, J., Abrams, L., Madaus, G., Russell, M., Ramos, M., & Jing, M. (2003). Perceived effects of state-mandated testing programs on teaching and learning: Findings from a national survey of teachers. Boston, MA: National Board on Educational Testing and Public Policy.
78. Perlstein, L. (2007). Tested: One American school struggles to make the grade. New York, NY: Holt.
79. Ravitch, D. (2010). The death and life of the great American school system: How testing and choice are undermining education. New York, NY: Basic Books.
80. Rumberger, R., & Arellano Anguiano, B. (2004). Understanding and addressing the California Latino achievement gap in early elementary school (UC Linguistic Minority Research Institute Working Paper). Retrieved from http://lmri.ucsb.edu.
81. Ryan, J. (2004). The perverse incentives of the No Child Left Behind Act. New York University Law Review, 79, 932–989.
82. Sacks, P. (1999). Standardized minds: The high price of America’s testing culture and what we can do to change it. Cambridge, MA: Perseus.
83. Samelson, F. (1977). World War I intelligence testing and the development of psychology. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 13(3), 274–282.
84. Scheurich, J. J., Skrla, L., & Johnson, J. F. (2003). Thinking carefully about equity and accountability.In L. Skrla & J. J. Scheurich (Eds.), Educational equity and accountability: Paradigms, policies and politics (pp. 13–27). New York, NY: Routledge.
85. Shepard, L. A. (1990). Inflated test scores gains: Is the problem old norms or teaching the test? Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 9(3), 15–22.
86. Smith, M., & O’Day, J. (1991). Systemic school reform. In S. Fuhrman & B. Malen (Eds.), The politics of curriculum and testing (pp. 233–267). New York, NY: Falmer.
87. Southern Education Foundation. (2010). A new diverse majority. Atlanta, GA: Author.
88. Spillane, J., & Miele, D. (2007) Evidence in practice: A framing of the terrain. In P. Moss (Ed.), Evidence and decision making: The 106th Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part 1 (pp. 46–73). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
89. Starch, D., & Elliott, E. C. (1912). Reliability of the grading of high-school work in English. School Review, 20, 442–457.
90. Strauss, V. (2009). Transcript: Ed. Sec. Duncan’s Speech on NCLB. Retrieved December 9, 2012, from http://voices.washingtonpost.com/answersheet/no-child-left-behind/transcript-preparedremarks-fo.html
91. Stutz, E. (2001, June 9). Bar for passing TAAS lowered cutoffscores for math test debated. The Dallas Morning News.
92. Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts. (2001). Special report: Undocumented immigrants in Texas, a financial analysis of the impact to the state budget and economy (Publication No. 96-1224). Retrieved from http://www.window.state.tx.us/specialrpt/undocumented/undocumented.pdf
93. Texas Education Agency. (1998). Grade-level retention in Texas public schools, 1996–97 (Document No. GE08 601 07). Austin, TX: Author.
94. Texas Education Agency. (1999). 1996–97 report on high school completion rates. Retrieved from http:/ritter.tea.state.tx.us/research/pdfs/9697comp.pdf
95. Texas Education Agency. (2000). Academic excellence indicator system reports, SY 2000–01. Retrieved from http://ritter.tea.state.tx.us/perfreport/aeis/2000/state.html
96. Texas Education Agency. (2001). Secondary school completion and dropouts in Texas public schools 1999–2000. Retrieved from http://ritter.tea.state.tx.us/research/pdfs/9900drpt.pdf
97. Texas Education Agency. (2002). Three-year follow-up of a Texas public high school cohort. Retrieved from http://ritter.tea.state.tx.us/research/pdfs/wp06.pdf
98. Texas Education Agency. (2003a). Secondary school completion and dropouts in Texas public schools 2000–01. Retrieved from http://ritter.tea.state.tx.us/research/pdfs/0001drpt_reprint.pdf
99. Texas Education Agency. (2003b). Statewide TAAS results—Percent passing tables Spring 1994–Spring 2002, Grade 10, Reading, Mathematics, Writing. Retrieved from http://ritter.tea.state.tx.us/student.assessment/reporting/results/swresults/august/g10all_au.pdf
100. Texas Education Agency. (2004a). Academic excellence indicator system: 2003–2004. Austin, TX: Author.
101. Texas Education Agency. (2004b). Secondary school completion and dropouts in Texas public schools 2001–2002. Retrieved from http://ritter.tea.state.tx.us/research/pdfs/0102drpt.pdf.
102. Texas Education Agency. (2005). Secondary school completion and dropouts in Texas public schools 2002–2003. Retrieved from http://ritter.tea.state.tx.us/research/pdfs/dropcomp_2002-03.pdf
103. Texas Education Agency. (2006). Secondary school completion and dropouts in Texas public schools 2003–2004. Retrieved from http://ritter.tea.state.tx.us/research/pdfs/dropcomp_2003-04.pdf.
104. Texas Education Agency. (2007). Secondary school completion and dropouts in Texas public schools 2005–2006. Retrieved from http://ritter.tea.state.tx.us/research/pdfs/dropcomp_2005-06.pdf
105. Texas Education Agency. (2008a). Grade-level retention in Texas public schools, 2006–07 (Document No. GE09 601 01). Austin, TX: Author.
106. Texas Education Agency. (2008b). Secondary school completion and dropouts in Texas public schools 2006–2007. Retrieved from http://ritter.tea.state.tx.us/research/pdfs/dropcomp_2006-07.pdf
107. Texas Education Agency. (2009). Statewide TAKS performance results. Retrieved from http://www.tea.state.tx.us/index3.aspx?id=3220&menu_id3=793
108. Texas Senate Bill 7, 73rd Texas Legislature, Education Code § 16.007 (1993).
109. Th orndike, E. L. (1923). Education: A first book. New York, NY: Macmillan.
110. Timmer, A., & Williamson, J. (1998). Immigration policy prior to the 1930s: Labor markets, policy interactions, and global backlash. Population and Development Review, 24(2), 739–771.
111. Toenjes, L. A., & Dworkin, A. G. (2002). Are increasing test scores in Texas really a myth, or is Haney’s myth a myth? Education Policy Analysis Archives, 10(17). Retrieved from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v10n17/
112. Tyack, D. (1974). The one best system: A history of American urban education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
113. Tyack, D. (1976). Ways of seeing: An essay on the history of compulsory schooling. Harvard Educational Review, 46, 355–389.
114. Tyack, D., & Cuban, L. (1995). Tinkering toward utopia: A century of public school reform. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
115. Tyack, D., James, T., & Benavot, A. (Eds.). (1987). Law and the shaping of public education, 1785–1954. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
116. U.S. Census Bureau. (2001). The Hispanic population reports: Census 2000 brief. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce, Economics and Statistics Administration.
117. U.S. Census Bureau. (2006). U.S. population estimates by age, sex, race, and Hispanic origin: July 1, 2005. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce, Economics and Statistics Administration.
118. U.S. Census Bureau. (2008). An older and more diverse nation by midcentury. U.S. Census Bureau News, Press Release CB08-123. Washington, DC: Author.
119. U.S. Census Bureau. (2009). School enrollment—Social and economic characteristics of students: October 2008. Retrieved from http://www.census.gov/population/www/socdemo/school/cps2008.html
120. Valencia, R. R., & Bernal, E. M. (2000). An overview of conflicting opinions in the TAAS case. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 22(4), 423–443.
121. Vasquez Heilig, J. (2011). Understanding the interaction between high-stakes graduation tests and English language learners. Teachers College Record, 113(12), 2633–2669.
122. Vasquez Heilig, J., Cole, H., & Aguilar, A. (2010). From Dewey to No Child Left Behind: The evolution and devolution of public arts education. Arts Education Policy Review, 111(4), 136–145.
123. Vasquez Heilig, J., & Darling-Hammond, L. (2008). Accountability Texas-style: The progress and learning of urban minority students in a high stakes testing context. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 30(2), 75–110.
124. Vasquez Heilig, J., Young, M., & Williams, A. (2012). At-risk student averse: Risk management and accountability. Journal of Educational Administration, 50(5), 562‒585.
125. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society (M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman, Eds.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
126. Weaver-Hightower, M. B. (2008). An ecology metaphor for educational policy analysis: A call to complexity. Educational Researcher, 37(3), 153–167.
127. Young, M. D., & Brewer, C. (2008).Fear and the preparation of school leaders: The role of ambiguity, anxiety and power in meaning making. Journal of Education Policy, 22(1), 106–129.
128. Zastrow, C., & Janc, H. (2004). Academic atrophy: The condition of the liberal arts in America’s public schools. Washington, DC: Council for Basic Education.