Communication, team performance, and the individual: Bridging technical dependencies

Academy of Management 2010 Annual Meeting - Dare to Care: Passion and Compassion in Management Practice and Research, AOM 2010

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages

  Wagstrom, Patrick ^a   Herbsleb, James D ^b   Carley, Kathleen M ^b  

^a IBM T J WATSON RESEARCH CENTER   (United States)

^b Carnegie Mellon University   (United States)

Author keywords

Communication; Coordination; Software engineering

Indexed keywords

COMMUNICATION; OPEN SYSTEMS; SOFTWARE DESIGN; SOFTWARE ENGINEERING;

COORDINATION; DEVELOPMENT TEAMS; OPEN SOURCE SOFTWARE COMMUNITY; SOFTWARE ARTIFACTS; SOFTWARE DEVELOPER; SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS; SOFTWARE REPOSITORIES; TASK DEPENDENCIES;

OPEN SOURCE SOFTWARE;

EID: 85087246067     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.5465/ambpp.2010.54500789     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (12)

1. Becker, M. C. 2001. Managing Dispersed Knowledge: Organizational Problems, Managerial Strategies, and Their Effectiveness. Journal of Management Studies, 38(7): 1037-1051.
2. Cataldo, M., & Herbsleb, J. D. 2008. Communication networks in geographically distributed software development. In Proceedings of the ACM 2008 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work: 579-588, San Diego, CA.
3. Cataldo, M., Herbsleb, J. D., & Carley, K. M. 2008. Socio-technical congruence: a framework for assessing the impact of technical and work dependencies on software development productivity. In Proceedings of the Second ACM-IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement: 2-11, Kaiserslautern, Germany.
4. Cataldo, M., Wagstrom, P. A., Herbsleb, J. D., & Carley, K. M. 2006. Identification of Coordination Requirements: Implications for the Design of Collaboration and Awareness Tools. In Proceedings of the 2006 20th Anniversary Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work: 353-362, Banff, AB.
5. Cummings, J. N., & Kiesler, S. 2008. Who collaborates successfully?: prior experience reduces collaboration barriers in distributed interdisciplinary research. In Proceedings of the ACM 2008 conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work: 437-446, San Diego, CA.
6. Druskat, V. U., & Kayes, D. C. 2000. Learning versus Performance in Short-Term Project Teams. Small Group Research, 31(3): 328-353.
7. Gall, H., Hajek, K., & Jazayeri, M. 1998. Detection of Logical Coupling Based on Product Release History. In 14th IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance, Bethesda, MD.
8. Hinds, P., & Mcgrath, C. 2006. Structures that Work: Social Structure, Work Structure and Coordination Ease in Geographically Distributed Teams. In Proceedings of the 2006 20th anniversary conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work: 343-352, Banff, AB.
9. Jackson, P. J. 1999. Organizational change and virtual teams: strategic and operational integration. Information Systems Journal, 9(4): 313-332.
10. Lipnack, J., & Stamps, J. 2000. Virtual Teams: People Working Across Boundaries with Technology (2nd ed.), New York: Wiley.
11. Sosa, M. E., Eppinger, S. D., & Rowles, C. M. 2004. The Misalignment of Product Architecture and Organizational Structure in Complex Product Development. Management Science, 50(12): 1674-1689.
12. Townsend, A., Demarie, S., & Hendrickson, A. 1998. Virtual teams: Technology and the workplace of the future. Academy of Management Executive, 12(3): 17-29.