Corporate social responsibility: Institutional response to labor, legal and shareholder environments

Academy of Management 2007 Annual Meeting: Doing Well by Doing Good, AOM 2007

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages

  Miller, Justin I ^a   Guthrie, Doug ^a  

^a NEW YORK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Corporate social responsibility (CSR); Institutional theory; Professionals and claims of rationality

Indexed keywords

COMMERCE;

CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITIES (CSR); EMPLOYMENT PRACTICES; HUMAN RIGHTS; INSTITUTIONAL THEORY; PROFESSIONALS AND CLAIMS OF RATIONALITY; PROTECTING WORKERS; SOCIAL ISSUES; TARGET AUDIENCE;

SOCIAL ASPECTS;

EID: 85087244760     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.5465/ambpp.2007.26508229     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (22)

1. Atkinson, L., & Galaskiewicz, J. 1988. Stock Ownership and Company Contributions to Charity. Administrative Science Quarterly, 33: 82-100.
2. Baum, J. A. C., & Oliver, C. 1991. Institutional Linkages and Organizational Mortality. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36: 187-218.
3. Burt, R. S. 1983. Corporate Philanthropy as a Cooperative Relation. Social Forces, 62: 419-449.
4. Coleman, J. S. 1982. Asymmetric Society (First ed.). Syracuse, New York: Syracuse University Press.
5. DiMaggio, P. J. 1988. Interest and Agency in Institutional Theory. In L. G. Zucker (Ed.), Institutional Patterns and Organizations: Culture and Environment: 3-21. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Ballinger Publishing.
6. DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. 1983. The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields. American Sociological Review, 48: 147- 160.
7. Dobbin, F., & Sutton, J. R. 1998. The Strength of a Weak State: The Rights Revolution and the Rise of Human Resources Management Divisions. American Journal of Sociology, 104: 441-476.
8. Edelman, L. B. 1992. Legal Ambiguity and Symbolic Structures: Organizational Mediation of Civil Rights Law. American Journal of Sociology, 97: 1531-1576.
9. Fligstein, N. 1990. The Transformation of Corporate Control. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
10. Galaskiewicz, J. 1985. Social Organization of an Urban Grants Economy: A Study of Business Philanthropy and Nonprofit Organizations. Orlando, Florida: Academic Press.
11. Galaskiewicz, J. 1997. An Urban Grants Economy Revisited: Corporate Charitable Contributions in the Twin Cities, 1979-81, 1987-89. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42: 445-471.
12. Galaskiewicz, J., & Burt, R. S. 1991. Interorganizational Contagion in Corporate Philanthropy. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36: 88-105.
13. Galaskiewicz, J., & Wasserman, S. 1989. Mimetic Processes within an Interorganizational Field: An Empirical Test. Administrative Science Quarterly, 34: 454-479.
14. Guthrie, D., & Roth, L. M. 1999a. The State, Courts, and Equal Opportunity for Female CEOs in U.S. Organizations: Specifying Institutional Mechanisms. Social Forces, 78: 511-542.
15. Guthrie, D., & Roth, L. M. 1999b. The State, Courts, and Maternity Policies in U.S. Organizations: Specifying Institutional Mechanisms. American Sociological Review, 64: 41-63.
16. Navarro, P. 1988. Why Do Corporations Give to Charity? Journal of Business, 61: 65-93.
17. Oliver, C. 1991. Strategic Responses to Institutional Processes. Academy of Management Review, 16: 145-179.
18. Roy, W. G. 1997. Socializing Capital: The Rise of the Large Industrial Corporation in America. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
19. Scott, W. R. 1987. The Adolescence of Institutional Theory. Administrative Science Quarterly, 32: 493-511.
20. Suchman, M. C. 1995. Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20: 571-610.
21. Suddaby, R., & Greenwood, R. 2005. Rhetorical Strategies of Legitimacy. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50: 35-67.
22. Useem, M. 1988. Market and Institutional Factors in Corporate Contributions. California Management Review, 30: 77-88.