Measuring the realism of motion in flight simulators

Modeling and Simulation Technologies Conference

Volumn , Issue , 2000, Pages

  van der Steen, Han F A M ^a  

^a Transport and Special Projects division   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CIRCUIT SIMULATION; SOFTWARE ENGINEERING;

IN-FLIGHT SIMULATION TECHNOLOGIES; IN-FLIGHT SIMULATORS; INERTIAL MOTIONS; MOTION DIRECTION; SELF MOTION; SELF-MOVEMENTS; VISUAL SCENE;

FLIGHT SIMULATORS;

EID: 85087191262     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.2514/6.2000-4293     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (9)

1. Advani SK (1998). The kinematic design of flight simulator motion-bases. Ph.D. Thesis. Delft University of Technology. ISBN 90-407-1671-4.
2. Hosman RJAW (1996). Pilot's perception and control of aircraft motions. Ph.D. Thesis. Delft University of Technology. ISBN 9040713847.
3. Howard IP & Childerson L (1994) The contributions of motion, the visual frame, and visual polarity to sensations of body tilt. Perception vol. 23; pp. 753-762.
4. Steen FAM van der (1996). Simulating selfmotion. Brain Research Bulletin vol. 40; pp. 473-475.
5. Steen FAM van der (1998a). Self-motion perception. Ph.D. Thesis. Delft University of Technology. ISBN 9090117571.
6. Steen FAM van der (1998b). An earthstationary perceived visual scene during roll and yaw motions in a flight simulator. Journal of Vestibular Research vol. 8(6); pp. 411-425.
7. Steen FAM van der & Brockhoff PTM (2000). Induction and impairment of saturated yaw and surge vection. Perception & Psychophysics vol. 62(1); pp. 89-99.
8. Teunissen RPAM (1999). The future of simulation and training. In: "Can flight Simulation do everything?". Proceedings of the Royal Aeronautical Society Flight Simulation Group Conference, London, 19-20 May 1999.
9. Wertheim AH (1994). Motion perception during self-motion: The direct versus inferential theory revisited. Bevahioural Brain Sciences vol. 17; pp.293-355.