An earth-stationary perceived visual scene during roll and yaw motions in a flight simulator

Journal of Vestibular Research: Equilibrium and Orientation

Volumn 8, Issue 6, 1998, Pages 411-425

  Van Der Steen, F A M ^a,b  

^a DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

^b NONE   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Perception; Self motion; Simulator; Visual vestibular

Indexed keywords

ACCELERATION; ADULT; AMPLITUDE MODULATION; ARTICLE; BODY EQUILIBRIUM; BODY MOVEMENT; CLINICAL TRIAL; DECELERATION; DIRECTIONAL VISION; FLIGHT; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; HUMAN TISSUE; MALE; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; VESTIBULAR FUNCTION;

EID: 0031796976     PISSN: 09574271     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3233/ves-1998-8602     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Steen FAM van der. Simulating self-motion. Brain Res Bull 1996;40:473-5.
2. Wertheim AH. Motion perception during self-motion: the direct versus inferential theory revisited. Behav Brain Sci 1994;17:293-355.
3. Oman CM. Motion sickness: a synthesis and evaluation of the sensory conflict theory. Can J Physiol Pharmacol 1990;68:294-303.
4. McCauley ME, Sharkey TJ. Cybersickness: perception of self-motion in virtual environments. Presence 1992; 1:311-8.
5. Yardley L. Motion sickness: a reappraisal of the sensory conflict approach. Br J Psychol 1992;83:449-71.
6. Koenderink JJ. Some theoretical aspects of optic flow. In: Warren R, Wertheim AH, editors. Perception and control of self-motion. Hillsdale (NJ): Lawrence Erlbaum; 1990. p53-68.
7. Melcher GA, Henn V. The latency of circular vection during different accelerations of the optokinetic stimulus. Percep Psychophys 1981;30:552-6.
8. Zacharias GL, Young LR. Influence of combined visual and vestibular cues on human perception and control of horizontal rotation. Exp Brain Res 1981;41: 159-71.
9. Mergner T, Becker W. Perception of horizontal self-rotation: multisensory and cognitive aspects. In: Warren R, Wertheim AH, editors. Perception and control of self-motion. Hillsdale (NJ): Lawrence Erlbaum; 1990. p219-63.
10. Howard IP, Childerson L. The contribution of motion, the visual frame, and visual polarity to sensations of body tilt. Perception 1994;23:753-62.
11. Brandt Th, Dichgans J, Koenig E. Differential effects of central versus peripheral vision on egocentric and exocentric motion perception. Exp Brain Res 1973;16: 476-91.
12. Wong SCP, Frost BJ. Subjective motion and acceleration induced by the movement of the observer's entire visual field. Percep Psychophys 1978;24:115-20.
13. Büttner U, Henn V. Circularvection: psychophysics and single-unit recordings in the alert monkey. Ann NY Acad Sci 1981;374:274-83.
14. Howard IP. Human visual orientation. Chichester, Sussex: John Wiley; 1982.
15. Mesland BS, Bles W, Werkhoven PJ. Effects of dissociating optic flow inputs from vestibular inputs on self-motion perception during virtual environment immersion. Barany Society Meeting, Sydney, Australia; 1996.
16. Gundry AJ. Thresholds to roll motion in a flight simulator. J Aircraft 1977;14:624-31.
17. Hosman RJAW, Vaart JC van der. Vestibular models and thresholds of motion perception. Results of tests in a flight simulator. Delft University of Technology; Report LR-265; 1978.
18. Howard IP, Templeton WB. Human spatial orientation. New York: John Wiley and Sons; 1966.
19. Benson AJ, Hutt ECB, Brown SF. Thresholds for the perception of whole body angular movement about a vertical axis. Aviat Space Environ Med 1989;60:205-13.
20. Kolasinski EM. Simulator sickness in virtual environments. U.S. Army Technical Report 1027;1995.
21. Hays WL. Statistics (4th ed). New York: Holt, Rinehart, Winston; 1988.