Shifting policy debates and the implications for governance

New Modes of Governance: Developing an Integrated Policy Approach to Science, Technology, Risk and the Environment

Volumn , Issue , 2017, Pages 3-17

  Lyall, Catherine ^a   Tait, Joyce ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85087139870     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (33)

1. 6, P. (1997), Holistic government, London: Demos.
2. 6, P. (2004), Personal communication.
3. 6 P., Seltzer, K., Leat, D. and Stoker, G. (2002), Towards Holistic Governance: the New Agenda in Government Reform, Basingstoke: Palgrave.
4. Bache, I. (2003), 'Governing through Governance: Education Policy Control under New Labour', Political Studies, 51(2), pp.300-314.
5. Better Regulation Task Force (2003), Scientific Research: Innovation with Controls, London: Cabinet Office.
6. Bevir, M. and Rhodes, R.A.W. (2003), Interpreting British Governance, London: Routledge.
7. Bruce, A., Lyall, C, Tait, J. and Williams, R. (2004), 'Interdisciplinary Integration in Europe: the Case of the Fifth Framework Programme', Futures, 36(4), pp.457-470.
8. Cabinet Office Performance Innovation Unit (2000), Wiring it Up. Whitehall's Management of Cross-cutting Policies and Services, London: The Stationery Office.
9. Cabinet Office Strategic Policy Making Team (1999), Professional Policy Making for the Twenty First Century, London: Cabinet Office.
10. Commission of the European Communities (2001), European Governance: a White Paper, Brussels: Commission of the European Communities.
11. Cooke, P., Boekholt, P. and Todtling, F. (2000), The Governance of Innovation in Europe. Regional Perspectives on Global Competitiveness, London: Pinter.
12. Davies, H.T.O., Nutley, S.M. and Smith, P.C. (eds) (2000), What Works? Evidence-Based Policy and Practice in Public Services, Bristol: The Policy Press.
13. DTI (1998), Our Competitive Future: building the knowledge driven economy', White Paper Cm 4176, London: DTI.
14. Edler, J., Kuhlmann, S. and Smits, R. (2002), 'New Governance for Innovation. The Need for Horizontal and Systemic Policy Co-ordination' in New Governance for Innovation? The Need for Horizontal Policy Co-ordination, Karlsruhe: Fraunhofer ISI.
15. Giddens, A. (1998), The Third Way: the Renewal of Social Democracy, Cambridge: Polity Press.
16. Giddens, A. (1999), BBC Reith Lectures 1999, http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/static/events/reith_99/.
17. HM Government (1999), Modernising Government White Paper, London: The Stationery Office.
18. Ince, M. (1986), The Politics of British Science, Brighton: Wheatsheaf Books.
19. Kooiman, J. (1993), Modern Governance. New Government-Society Interactions, London: Sage.
20. Lyall, C. and Tait, J. (2004), 'Foresight in a Multi-level Governance Structure: Policy Integration and Communication', Science and Public Policy, 31(1), pp.27-37.
21. Newman, J. (2001), Modernising Governance. New Labour, Policy and Society, London: Sage.
22. Pierre, J. and Peters, B. G (2000), Governance, Politics and the State, Basingstoke: Macmillan.
23. Rhodes, R.A.W. (1997), Understanding Governance. Policy Networks, Governance, Reflexivity and Accountability, Buckingham: Open University Press.
24. Ronayne, J. (1984), Science in Government, Caulfield East Victoria: Edward Arnold (Australia).
25. Sloat, A. (2002), 'Governance: Contested Perceptions of Civic Participation', Scottish Affairs, 39(Spring), pp. 103-117.
26. Stoker, G (1998), 'Governance as theory: five propositions', International Social Science Journal, 50(155), pp.17-28.
27. Tait, J. (1993), Written evidence on behalf of ESRC to Report of House of Lords Select Committee on Science and Technology on Regulation of the United Kingdom Biotechnology Industry and Global Competitiveness, 7th Report, Session 1992/93, London: HMSO.
28. Tait, J. and Bruce, A. (2004), 'Global Change and Transboundary Risks', in T. McDaniels and M. Small (eds), Risk Analysis and Society: an Interdisciplinary Characterisation of the Field, Cambridge University Press, pp 367-419. (Commissioned by Society for Risk Analysis for the International Symposium on Risk and Governance, Warrenton, VA, USA, June 2000.)
29. Tait, J., Chataway, J. and Wield, D. (2001), PITA Project (Policy Influences on Technology for Agriculture: Chemicals, Biotechnology and Seeds) Final Report. hrrp://www.technology.open.ac.uk/cts/pita/; http://www.supra.ed.ac.uk/Publications/paper22.pdf.
30. Tait, J., Chataway, J. and Wield, D. (2004), 'Governance, Policy and Industry Strategies: Agro-biotechnology and Pharmaceuticals', Innogen Working-Paper 12; http://www.innogen.ac.uk/ownPubs/Innogen_paper_12.pdf.
31. Tait, J. and Lyall, C. (2001), Investigation into ESRC-funded Interdisciplinary Research, Report to ESRC. http://wvw.supra.ed.ac.uk/Publications/ESRC_report_Interdisiplinary_research.pdf.
32. Tait, J. and Williams, R. (1999), 'Policy Approaches to Research and Development: Foresight, Framework and Competitiveness', Science and Public Policy, 26(2), pp. 101-112.
33. Tait, J., Williams, R., Bruce, A. and Lyall, C. (2002), Interdisciplinary Integration in the Fifth Framework Programme (II-FP5), Report to EC (Accompanying Measure SEAC-1999-00034). http://www.supra.ed.ac.uk/Publications/FINAL_REPORT.pdf.