The governance challenges of breakthrough science and technology

New Modes of Governance: Developing an Integrated Policy Approach to Science, Technology, Risk and the Environment

Volumn , Issue , 2017, Pages 45-66

  Spinardi, Graham ^a   Williams, Robin ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85087139014     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (49)

1. Anderson, P. and Tushman, M. L. (1990), 'Technological Discontinuities and Dominant Designs: A Cyclical Model of Technological Change', Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 35, pp.604-633.
2. Arrow, K. (1962), 'The economic implications of learning by doing', Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 29, pp.155-173.
3. Bozeman, B. and Rogers, J.D. (2002), A chum model of scientific knowledge value: Internet researchers as a knowledge value collective', Research Policy, Vol. 31, pp.769-794.
4. Braun, E. and MacDonald, S. (1982), Revolution in Miniature: History and Impact of Semiconductor Electronics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5. Brosveet, J. and Serensen, K.H. (2000), 'Fishing for fun and profit: National Domestication of Multimedia: The Case of Norway', The Information Society, Vol. 16(4), pp.263-276.
6. Clausen, C. and Williams, R. (eds) (1997), 'The Social Shaping of Computer-Aided Production Management and Computer Integrated Manufacture', Vol. 5, Proceedings of International Conference, COST A4, Luxembourg: European Commission DGXIII.
7. Collingridge, D. (1992), The Management of Scale: Big Organizations, Big Decisions, Big Mistakes, London: Intl Thomson Business Press.
8. Constant, E. W. (1987), 'The Social Locus of Technological Practice: Community, System or Organization?' in Bijker, W.E., Hughes, T.P. and Pinch, T. (eds), The Social Construction of Technological Systems, Cambridge: MIT Press.
9. Cronberg, T. (1996), 'Technology Assessment in the Danish Socio-Political Context', International journal of Technology Management. Vol. 11(5/6).
10. David, P. (1985), 'Clio and the economics of QWERTY', Economic History, Vol. 75, pp.332-337.
11. Fleck, J. (1982), 'Development and Establishment in Artificial Intelligence', in D. Reidel (ed.), Scientific Establishments and Hierarchies, Vol. 6, pp. 169-217 of 'Sociology of the Sciences', Dordrecht: Norbert Elias, Publishing Company.
12. Freeman, C. (1974), The Economics of Innovation, Harmondsworth: Penguin.
13. Galvin, R. (1998), 'Science Roadmaps', Science, Vol. 280,8 May, 803.
14. Garud, R. and Ahlstrom, D. (1997), 'Technology assessment: a socio-cognitive perspective', Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 14, pp.25-48.
15. Georghiou, L. and Roessner, D. (2000), 'Evaluating technology programs: tools and methods', Research Policy, Vol. 29, pp.657-678.
16. Gibbons, M., Limoges, C, Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P. and Trow, M. (1994), The New Production of Knowledge. The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies, London: Sage.
17. Gilfillan, S. (1970), The Sociology of Invention, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
18. Grove-White, R., Kearnes, M., Miller, P., Macnaghten, P., Wilsdon, J. and Wynne, B. (2004), 'Bio-to-Nano? Learning the Lessons, Interrogating the Comparison', A Working Paper by the Institute for Environment, Philosophy and Public Policy, Lancaster University and Demos.
19. Hughes, T.P. (1987), "The evolution of large technological systems', in Bijker, W., Hughes, T.P. and Pinch, T. (eds), The Social Construction of Technological Systems, Cambridge: MIT Press, pp.51-82.
20. Kassicieh, S.K., Walsh, S.T., Cummings, J.C., McWhorter, P.J., Romig, A.D. and Williams, W.D. (2002), 'Factors differentiating the commercialization of disruptive and sustaining technologies', IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, Vol. 49(4), November, pp.375-387.
21. Kirchhoff, B. and Walsh, S. (2000), 'Entrepreneurship's role in commercialization of disruptive technologies', Unternehmer und Unternehmensperpektive fur Klien-und-Mittelunternehman, Berlin, pp.323-332.
22. Kolodny, H., Liu, M., Stymne, B. and Denis, H. (1996), 'New technology and the emerging organisational paradigm', Human Relations, Vol. 49(12), pp.1457-1487.
23. Kostoff, R.N. and Schaller, R.R. (2001), 'Science and Technology Roadmaps', IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management Vol. 48(2), May, pp. 132-143.
24. Kostoff, R.N., Boylan, R. and Simons, G.R. (2004), 'Disruptive technology roadmaps', Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Vol. 7, pp.141-159.
25. Kuhn, T. (1962), The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, University of Chicago Press.
26. Latour, B. and Woolgar, S. (1979), Laboratory Life: The Social Construction of Scientific Facts, London: Sage.
27. Law, J. (1988), 'The Anatomy of a Socio-Technical Struggle: The Design of the TSR 2', in Elliott, B. (ed.), Technology and Social Process, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, pp.44-69.
28. MacKenzie, D. (1998), 'The Certainty Trough', in Williams, R., Faulkner, W. and Fleck, J. (eds), Exploring Expertise, Basingstoke: Macmillan, Chap 15, pp.325-329.
29. National Research Council (1999), 'Funding a Revolution: Government Support for Computing Research Committee on Innovations in Computing and Communications', Lessons from History, Washington, D. C: National Academy Press.
30. National Science Foundation (2002), 'Converging Technologies for Improving Human Performance', Arlington, VA: NSF June 2002. The report is available in a draft version on the Internet at: http://www.itri.loyola.edu/ConvergingTechnologies.
31. Nowotny, H., Scott, P. and Gibbons, M. (2001), Re-Thinking Science: Knowledge and the Public in an Age of Uncertainty, London: Polity Press.
32. Oakley, B. (1990), 'Look back in Alvey: why support for R&D is not enough', Edinburgh PICT Working Paper 18, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University.
33. O'Connor, G. C. and Rice, M.P. (2001), Opportunity Recognition and Breakthrough Innovation in Large Established Finns', California Management Review, Vol. 43, No 2, pp.95-116.
34. Phaal, R., Famikh, C.J.P. and Probert, D.R. (2004), 'Technology roadmapping-A planning framework for evolution and revolution', Technological Forecasting & Social Change, Vol. 71, pp.5-26.
35. Phoenix, C. and Drexler, E. (2004), 'Safe exponential manufacturing', Nanotechnology No. 15, pp.869-872.
36. Prahalad, C. K. and Hamel, G. (1990), 'The core competence of the corporation', Harvard Business Review, Vol. 68(3), May/June, pp.79-91.
37. Probert, D. and Shehabuddeen, N. (1999), 'Technology road mapping: The issues of managing technology change', International Journal of Technology Management, Vol. 17(6), pp.646-661.
38. Rammert, W., et al. (eds) (2003), INNOVERSITY Innovation and Diversity in a Knowledge Society: Towards a New Regime of Distributed Innovation? Proceedings of international research workshop, 18-20 September 2003, European Academy Berlin, Berlin: Technical University of Berlin.
39. Rip, A. (2002), 'Science for the 21st Century', in Tindemans, P., Verrijn-Stuart, A. and Visser, R. (eds), The Future of the Sciences and Humanities, Amsterdam University Press.
40. Rogers, J.D. and Bozeman, B. (2001), 'Knowledge Value Alliances: An Alternative to the R&D Project Focus in Evaluation', Science, Technology & Human Values Vol. 26(1), pp.23-55.
41. Rogers, J.D., Bozeman, B. and Chompalov, I. (2001), 'Obstacles and opportunities in the application of network analysis to the evaluation of R&D', Research Evaluation, Vol. 10(3) December, pp.161-172.
42. Rosenberg, N. (1976), Perspectives on Technology, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
43. Royal Society (2004), Nanoscience and Nanotechnologies: Opportunities and Uncertainties, London: Royal Society.
44. Russell, S. and Williams, R. (2002), 'Concepts, Spaces and Tools for Action? Exploring the Policy Potential of the Social Shaping of Technology: Perspective', in Serensen, K.H. and Williams, R. (eds) Shaping Technology, Guiding Policy: Concepts, Spaces and Tools, Aldershot: Edward Elgar, Chapter 4, pp. 133-154.
45. Schumpeter, J. (1942), Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy, New York: Harper & Brothers.
46. Tait, J. and Williams, R. (1999), 'Policy Approaches to Research and Development: Foresight, Framework and Competitiveness' Science and Public Policy, 1999, Vol. 26(2), pp.101-112.
47. van Lente, H. and Rip, A. (1988), 'Expectations in Technological Developments: An Example of Prospective Structures to be Filled in by Agency', in Disco, C. and van der Meulen, B. (eds), Getting New Technologies Together: Studies in Making Sociotechnical Order, Walter de Gruyter, pp.203-229.
48. Walsh, S.T. (2004), 'Roadmapping a disruptive technology: A case study. The emerging microsystems and top-down nanosystems industry', Technological Forecasting & Social Change, Vol. 71, pp.161-85.
49. Walsh, S., Kirchoff, B. and Newbert, S. (2002), 'Differentiating market strategies for disruptive technologies', IEEE Trans. Eng. Manage., Vol. 49(4), pp.341-351.