Conflict and self-interest in deliberation

Deliberative Democracy and its Discontents

Volumn , Issue , 2017, Pages 107-132

  Mansbridge, Jane ^a  

^a HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85086971443     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781315258249-21     Document Type: Chapter

References (70)

1. Arendt, H. [1963] (1965), On Revolution (New York: Viking).
2. Aristotle [c. 347–322 BCE] (1988), The Politics, trans. Jowett/Barnes (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
3. Arnold, M. [1869] (1957), Culture and Anarchy, J.D. Wilson (ed.) (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
4. Bachrach, P. (1974), ‘Interest, Participation and Democratic Theory’, in J.R. Pennock and J.W. Chapman (eds), Participation in Politics, Nomos XVI (New York: Lieber- Atherton), pp. 39–55.
5. Barber, B.R (1984), Strong Democracy: Participatory Politics for a New Age (Berkeley: University of California Press).
6. Barry, B. (1965), Political Argument (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul).
7. Barry, B. [1979] (1991), ‘Is Democracy Special?’, in B. Barry (ed.), Democracy and Power (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 24–60.
8. Benhabib, S. (1996), ‘Toward a Deliberative Model of Democratic Legitimacy’, in S. Benhabib (ed.), Democracy and Difference (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press), pp. 67–94.
9. Bohman, J. (1998), ‘Survey Article: The Coming of Age of Deliberative Democracy’, Journal of Political Philosophy, 6(4), pp. 400–25.
10. Breed, W. and Seaman, S.M. (1971), ‘Indirect Democracy and Social Process in Periclean Athens’, Social Science Quarterly, 52, pp. 631–45.
11. Chambers, S. (1996), Reasonable Democracy: Jürgen Habermas and the Politics of Discourse (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press).
12. Chambers, S. (2003), ‘Deliberative Democratic Theory’, Annual Review of Political Science, 6, pp. 307–26.
13. Cohen, J. (1989), ‘Deliberation and Democratic Legitimacy’, in A. Hamlin and P. Pettit (eds), The Good Polity (Oxford: Blackwell), pp. 17–34.
14. Cohen, J. and Rogers, J. (2003), ‘Power and Reason’, in A. Fung and E.O. Wright (eds), Deepening Democracy: Experiments in Empowered Participatory Governance (London: Verso Press), pp. 237–55.
15. Connor, W.R. (1971), The New Politicians of Fifth Century Athens (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).
16. Coser, L. (1956), The Functions of Social Conflict (New York: Free Press).
17. Dahl, R.A. (1989), Democracy and Its Critics (New York: Yale University Press).
18. Dover, K. (1974), Greek Popular Morality in the Time of Plato and Aristotle (Berkeley: University of California Press).
19. Dryzek, J.S. (2001), ‘Legitimacy and Economy in Deliberative Democracy’, Political Theory, 29(5), pp. 651–69.
20. Elster, J. (1986), ‘The Market and the Forum: Three Varieties of Political Theory’, in J. Elster and A. Hylland (eds), Foundations of Social Choice Theory (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 103–32.
21. Elster, J. (1998), ‘Deliberation and Constitution Making’, in J. Elster (ed.), Deliberative Democracy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 97–122.
22. Fisher, R. and Ury, W. [1981] (1983), Getting to Yes (New York: Penguin).
23. Follett, M.P. [1925] (1942), ‘Constructive Conflict’, in H.C. Metcalf and L. Urwick (eds), Dynamic Administration: The Collected Papers of Mary Parker Follett (New York: Harper), pp. 30–49.
24. Forçade, E. (1853), Études historiques (Paris: Michel Levy).
25. Forester, J. (1999), The Deliberative Practitioner: Encouraging Participatory Processes (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).
26. Fraser, N. [1992] (1997), ‘Rethinking the Public Sphere’, in N. Fraser, Justice Interruptus (New York: Routledge), pp. 69–98.
27. Fung, A. (2003), ‘Recipes for Public Spheres’, Journal of Political Philosophy, 11(3), pp. 338–67.
28. Fung, A. and Wright, E.O. (2003), ‘Thinking about Empowered Participatory Governance’, in A. Fung and E.O. Wright (eds), Deepening Democracy (London: Verso), pp. 3–42.
29. Galinsky, A.D., Maddux, W.W. and Ku, G. (2005), ‘Why It Pays to Get inside the Head (But not the Heart) of your Opponent: The Differential Effects of Perspective-taking and Empathy in Strategic Interaction’, unpublished manuscript.
30. Groch, S. (2001), ‘Free Spaces: Creating Oppositional Consciousness in the Disability Rights Movement’, in J. Mansbridge and A. Morris (eds), Oppositional Consciousness. The Subjective Roots of Social Protest (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press), pp. 65–98.
31. Guinier, L. (1994), The Tyranny of the Majority (New York: Free Press).
32. Gutmann, A. and Thompson, D. (1996), Democracy and Disagreement (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).
33. Habermas, J. [1962] (1989), The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society, trans. T. Burger (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).
34. Habermas, J. [1971] (1985), ‘Hannah Arendt: On the Concept of Power’, in J. Habermas, Philosophical-Political Profiles, trans. F.G. Lawrence (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press), pp. 173–90.
35. Habermas, J. [1981] (1984), The Theory of Communicative Action, vol. I: Reason and the Rationalization of Society, trans. T. McCarthy (Boston: Beacon Press).
36. Habermas, J. (1982), ‘A Reply to my Critics’, in J.B. Thompson and D. Held (eds), trans. T. McCarthy, Habermas: Critical Debates (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press), pp. 219–83.
37. Habermas, J. [1992] (1996), Between Facts and Norms, trans. W. Rehg (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).
38. Hall, C. (2005), ‘Where is the Passion in Deliberative Democracy?’, paper prepared for the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, DC.
39. Held, V. (1970), The Public Interest and Individual Interests (New York: Basic Books).
40. Honig, B. (1993), Political Theory and the Displacement of Politics (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press).
41. Karpowitz, C.F. and Mansbridge, J. (2005), ‘Disagreement and Consensus’, Journal of Public Deliberation, 1(1), pp. 348–64.
42. Kendall, W. (1941), John Locke and the Doctrine of Majority-rule (Urbana: The University of Illinois Press).
43. Kennedy, E. (1988), ‘Introduction: Carl Schmitt’s Parlamentarismus in Its Historical Context’, in C. Schmitt, The Crisis of Parliamentary Democracy, E. Kennedy (ed.) (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press), pp. xiii–1.
44. Lamartine, A. (1831), Sur la politique rationnelle (Paris: C. Gosselin).
45. Lamartine, A. [1848] (1850), Le Passé, le Présent, L’Avenir de la République (Bruxelles: Société Typographique Belge).
46. Lijphart, A. (1977), Democracy in Plural Societies (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press).
47. Lijphart, A. (1999), Patterns of Democracy (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press).
48. Locke, J. [1689] (1960), Two Treatises of Government, P. Laslett (ed.) (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
49. Manin, B. (1987), ‘On Legitimacy and Political Deliberation’, Political Theory, 15(3), pp. 338–68.
50. Mansbridge, J. (1980), Beyond Adversary Democracy (New York: Basic Books).
51. Mansbridge, J. (1994), ‘Using Power/Fighting Power’, Constellations, 1(1), pp. 53–73.
52. Mansbridge, J. (1996), ‘Using Power/Fighting Power: The Polity’, in S. Benhabib (ed.), Democracy and Difference (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press), pp. 46–66.
53. Mansbridge, J. (1998), ‘On the Contested Nature of the Public Good’, in W.W. Powell and E.S. Clemens (eds), Private Action and the Public Good (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press), pp. 3–19.
54. Mansbridge, J. (2001), ‘A “Moral Core” Solution to the Prisoners’ Dilemma’, in J.W. Scott and D. Keates (eds), Schools of Thought: Twenty-five Years of Interpretive Social Science (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press), pp. 330–47.
55. Mansbridge, J. (2005), ‘Cracking Through Hegemonic Ideology: The Logic of Formal Justice’, Social Justice Research, 18, pp. 335–47.
56. Mansbridge, J., Hartz-Karp, J., Amengual, M. and Gastil, J. (2006), ‘Norms of Deliberation: An Inductive Study’, The Journal of Public Deliberation, 2(7), pp. 1–47 (http://services.bepress.com/jpd/vol2/iss1/art7).
57. Marcus, G.E. (2002), The Sentimental Citizen (University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press).
58. Marcus, G.E., Neuman, W.R. and MacKuen, M. (2000), Affective Intelligence and Political Judgment (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).
59. Nussbaum, M.C. (1995), ‘Emotions and Women’s Capabilities’, in M.C. Nussbaum and J. Glover (eds), Women, Culture, and Development (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 360–96.
60. Ober, J. (1989), Mass and Elite in Democratic Athens (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).
61. Pearson, L. (1962), Popular Ethics in Ancient Greece (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press).
62. Rorty, A.O. (1985), ‘Varieties of Rationality, Varieties of Emotion’, Social Science Information, 24, pp. 343–53.
63. Sanders, L.M. (1997), ‘Against Deliberation’, Political Theory, 25, pp. 347–76.
64. Schmitt, C. [1923] (1988a), The Crisis of Parliamentary Democracy, trans. E. Kennedy (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).
65. Schmitt, C. [1926] (1988b), ‘On the Contradiction between Parliamentarism and Democracy’, Preface to the Second Edition of The Crisis of Parliamentary Democracy, trans. E. Kennedy (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press), pp. 1–17.
66. Schumpeter, J. (1922), ‘Sozialistische Möglichkeiten von Heute’, Archiv für Sozialwissenschaft und Sozialpolitik, 48, pp. 305–60.
67. Steiner, J., Bächtiger, A., Spörndli, M. and Steenbergen, M.R. (2004), Deliberative Politics in Action: Analyzing Parliamentary Discourse (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
68. Woodhouse, A.S.P. (ed.) (1951), Puritanism and Liberty: Being the Army Debates (1647–49) from the Clarke Manuscripts (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).
69. Young, I.M. (1996), ‘Communication and the Other: Beyond Deliberative Democracy’, in S. Benhabib (ed.), Democracy and Difference (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press), pp. 120–35.
70. Young, I.M. (2000), Inclusion and Democracy (Oxford: Oxford University Press).