Is the ideal of a deliberative democracy coherent?

Deliberative Democracy and its Discontents

Volumn , Issue , 2017, Pages 3-25

  Lafont, Cristina ^a  

^a NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85086967783     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781315258249-11     Document Type: Chapter

References (38)

1. Bohman, J. (1998), Public Deliberation (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).
2. Christiano, T. (1997), ‘The Significance of Public Deliberation’, in J. Bohman and W. Rehg (eds), Deliberative Democracy (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press), pp. 243–77.
3. Christiano, T. (1999), ‘Justice and Disagreement at the Foundations of Political Authority’, Ethics, 110, pp. 165–87.
4. Coleman, J. and Ferejohn, J. (1986), ‘Democracy and Social Choice’, Ethics, 97, pp. 6–25.
5. Cohen, J. [1989] (1997), ‘Deliberation and Democratic Legitimacy’, in J. Bohman and W. Rehg (eds), Deliberative Democracy (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press), pp. 67–92.
6. Dahl, R. (1989), Democracy and its Critics (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press).
7. Dowding, K., Goodin, R. and Pateman, C. (eds) (2004), Justice and Democracy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
8. Dworkin, R. [1987] (2003), ‘What is Equality? Part 4: Political Equality’, in T. Christiano, Philosophy and Democracy (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 116–37.
9. Elster, J. [1986] (1997), ‘The Market and the Forum: Three Varieties of Political Theory’, in J. Bohman and W. Rehg (eds), Deliberative Democracy (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press), pp. 3–34.
10. Elster, J. (1998), ‘Deliberation and Constitution Making’, in J. Elster (ed.), Deliberative Democracy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 97–122.
11. Estlund, D. (1993a), ‘Making Truth Safe for Democracy’, in D. Copp, J. Hampton, and J. Roemer (eds), The Idea of Democracy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 71–100.
12. Estlund, D. (1993b), ‘Who’s Afraid of Deliberative Democracy? On the Strategic/Deliberative Dichotomy in Recent Constitutional Jurisprudence’, Texas Law Review, 71, pp. 1437–77.
13. Estlund, D. (1997), ‘Beyond Fairness and Deliberation: The Epistemic Dimension of Democratic Authority’, in J. Bohman and W. Rehg (eds), Deliberative Democracy (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press), pp. 173–204.
14. Gutmann, A. and Thompson, D. (1996), Democracy and Disagreement (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).
15. Gutmann, A. and Thompson, D. (2000), ‘Why Deliberative Democracy is different?’, in E.F. Paul, F.D. Miller and J. Paul (eds), Democracy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 161–80.
16. Gutmann, A. and Thompson, D. (2004), Why Deliberative Democracy (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).
17. Habermas, J. (1988), ‘Popular Sovereignty as Procedure’, in J. Habermas (1996), Between Facts and Norms, trans. W. Rehg (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press), pp. 463–90.
18. Habermas, J. [1991] (1993), ‘On the Pragmatic, the Ethical, and the Moral Employments of Practical Reason’, in J. Habermas, Justification and Application (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press), pp. 1–17.
19. Habermas, J. [1992] (1994), ‘Three Normative Models of Democracy’, Constellations, 1(1), pp. 1–10.
20. Habermas, J. [1992] (1996), Between Facts and Norms, trans. W. Rehg (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).
21. Habermas, J. [1999] (2003), ‘Rightness versus Truth: On the Sense of Normative Validity in Moral Judgments and Norms’, in J. Habermas, Truth and Justification, trans. B. Fultner (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press), pp. 213–36.
22. Lafont, C. (1999), The Linguistic Turn in Hermeneutic Philosophy (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).
23. Lafont, C. (2003), ‘Procedural Justice? Implications of the Rawls–Habermas Debate for Discourse Ethics’, Philosophy and Social Criticism, 29(2), pp. 167–85.
24. Lafont, C. (2004), ‘Moral Objectivity and Reasonable Agreement: Can Realism be reconciled with Kantian Constructivism?’, Ratio Juris, 17(1), pp. 27–51.
25. Lafont, C. (2006), ‘Justice and Legitimacy. The Intricate Relation of Morality to Politics’, in M. Herrera and P. De Greiff (eds), Razones de la Justicia. Homenaje a Thomas McCarthy (México: UNAM) (forthcoming).
26. McCarthy, T. (1991), ‘Practical Discourse: On the Relation of Morality to Politics’, in T. McCarthy, Ideals and Illusions (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press), pp. 181–99.
27. McCarthy, T. (1996), ‘Legitimacy and Diversity: Dialectical Reflections on Analytical Distinctions’, Cardozo Law Review, 17(4–5), pp. 1083–125.
28. Nino, C. (1996), The Constitution of Deliberative Democracy (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press).
29. Pettit, P. (1997), Republicanism (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
30. Pettit, P. (1999), ‘Republican Freedom and Contestatory Democratization’, in I. Shapiro and C. Hacker-Cordón (eds), Democracy’s Value (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 163–90.
31. Pettit, P. (2000), ‘Democracy, Electoral and Contestatory’, Nomos, 42, pp. 105–44.
32. Pettit, P. (2003), ‘Deliberative Democracy, the Discursive Dilemma, and Republican Theory’, in J. Fishkin and P. Laslett (eds), Debating Deliberative Democracy (Oxford: Blackwell), pp. 138–62.
33. Shapiro, I. (1999), ‘Enough of Deliberation. Politics is about Interests and Power’, in S. Macedo (ed.), Deliberative Politics. Essays on ‘Democracy and Disagreement’ (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 28–38.
34. Steiner, J., Bächtiger, A., Spörndli, M. and Steenbergen, M. (2004), Deliberative Politics in Action. Analysing Parliamentary Discourse (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
35. Sunstein, C.R. [2002] (2003), ‘The Law of Group Polarization’, in J. Fishkin and P. Laslett (eds), Debating Deliberative Democracy (Oxford: Blackwell), pp. 80–101.
36. Young, I. [1989] (2003), ‘Polity and Group Difference: A Critique of the Ideal of Universal Citizenship’, in T. Christiano (ed.), Philosophy and Democracy (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 287–309.
37. Young, I. (1997), ‘Difference as a Resource for Democratic Communication’, in J. Bohman and W. Rehg (eds), Deliberative Democracy (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press), pp. 383–406.
38. Young, I. (2000), Inclusion and Democracy (Oxford: Oxford University Press).