Use of adaptive metamodeling for design optimization

9th AIAA/ISSMO Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization

Volumn , Issue , 2002, Pages

  Martin, Jay D ^a   Simpson, Timothy W ^b  

^a State College   (United States)

^b PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Conceptual design; Design of experiments; Kriging; Metamodel

Indexed keywords

CONCEPTUAL DESIGN; DESIGN OF EXPERIMENTS; INTERPOLATION; MEAN SQUARE ERROR;

CONTINUOUS UPDATING; CROSS-VALIDATION TECHNIQUE; DESIGN OPTIMIZATION; DESIGN SPACE VISUALIZATION; KRIGING; KRIGING META MODELS; META MODEL; SIMULATION-BASED DESIGNS;

ITERATIVE METHODS;

EID: 85086616918     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.2514/6.2002-5631     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (33)

1. Yukish, M. and Kurtz, P., Simulation Based Design for Undersea Warfare, Lockheed Martin Systems Engineering and Software Symposium, New Orleans, LA, April 10, 1998.
2. th AIAA/NASA/USAF/ISSMO Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization, Long Beach, CA, AIAA, September 6-8, 2000. AIAA-2000-4816.
3. th AIAA/ISSMO Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization, Atlanta, GA, AIAA, September 4-6, 2002. AIAA-2002-5622.
4. Kleijnen, J.P.C., A Comment on Blanning's Metamodel for Sensitivity Analysis: The Regression Metamodel in Simulation, Interfaces, Vol. 5, No. 1, 1975, pp. 21-23.
5. Simpson, T.W., Peplinski, J., Koch, P.N., and Allen, J.K., Metamodels for Computer-Based Engineering Design: Survey and Recommendations, 2001 Engineering with Computers, Vol. 17, No. 2, 2001, pp. 129-150.
6. Toropov, V., van Keulen, F., Markine, V., and de Doer, H., "Refinements in the Multi-Point Approximation Method to Reduce the Effects of Noisy Structural Resposes," 6th AIAA/USAF/NASA/ISSMO Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization, Bellevue, WA, AIAA, Vol. 2, September 4-6, 1996, pp. 941-951. AIAA-96-4087-CP.
7. Alexandrov, N.M., Dennis, J.E., Jr., Lewis, R.M., and Torczon, V., A Trust Region Framework for Managing the Use of Approximation Models in Optimization, Structural Optimization, Vol. 15, No. 1, 1998, pp. 16-23.
8. Alexandrov, N.M., "On Managing the Use of Surrogates in General Nonlinear Optimization and MDO," 7th AIAA/USAF/NASA/ISSMO Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization, St. Louis, MO, AIAA, Vol. 2, September 2-4, 1998, pp. 720-729. AIAA-98-4798.
9. Rodriguez, J.F., Renaud, J.E., and Watson, L.T., "Trust Region Augemented Lagrangian Methods for Sequential Response Surface Approximation and Optimization," Advances in Design Automation, Sacremento, CA, ASME, September 14-17, 1997. DETC97/DAC-3773.
10. Renaud, J.E. and Gabriele, G.A., Approximation in Nonhierarchic System Optimization, AIAA Journal, Vol. 32, No. 1, 1994, pp. 198-205.
11. Renaud, J.E. and Gabriele, G.A., "Sequential Global Approximation in Non-Hierarchic System Decomposition and Optimization, Advances in Design Automation (Gabriele, G.A.), Miami, FL, ASME, Vol. 32-1, September 22-25, 1991, pp. 191-200.
12. Wujek, B.A., Renaud, J.E., Batill, S.M., and Brockman, J.B., Concurrent Subspace Optimization Using Design Variable Sharing in a Distributed Computing Environment, Advances in Design Automation (Azarm, S. and Dutta, D.), Boston, MA, ASME, Vol. 82, September 17-21, 1995, pp. 181-188.
13. nd AIAA/ASME/ASC/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference and Exhibit, Seattle, WA, AIAA, Vol. 5, April 16-19, 2001, pp. 3221-3232. AIAA-2001-1622.
14. Wang, G., "Improvement on the Adaptive Response Surface Method for High-dimensional Computationintensive Design Problems," ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences - Design Automation Conference (Diaz, A.), Pittsburgh, PA, ASME, September 9-12, 2001. DETC2001/DAC-21141.
15. Alexandrov, N.M., Nielson, E.J., Lewis, R.M., and Anderson, W.K., "First-Order Model Management with Variable-Fidelity Physics Applied to Multi-Element Airfoil Optimization," 8th AIAA/NASA/USAF/ISSMO Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization, Long Beach, CA, AIAA, September 6-8, 2000. AIAA-2000-4886.
16. Booker, A.J., Dennis, J.E., Jr., Frank, P.D., Serafini, D.B., Torczon, V., and Trosset, M., A Rigorous Framework for Optimization of Expensive Functions by Surrogates, Structural Optimization, Vol. 17, No. 1, 1999, pp. 1-13.
17. Markus, S., Houstis, E.N., Catlin, A.C., Rice, J.R., Tsompanopoulou, P., Vavalis, E., Gottfried, D., Su, K., and Balakrishnan, G., An Agent-based Netcentric Framework for Multidisciplinary Problem Solving Environments (MPSE), International Journal of Computational Engineering Science, Vol. 1, No. 1, 2000, pp. 33-60.
18. Serafini, D.B., "Software for Managing Approximation Models in Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization," 6th AIAA/USAF/NASA/ISSMO Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization, Bellevue, WA, AIAA, Vol. 2, September 4-6, 1996, pp. 1063-1067. AIAA-96-4104-CP.
19. Osio, I.G. and Amon, C.H., An Engineering Design Methodology with Multistage Bayesian Surrogate and Optimal Sampling, Research in Engineering Design, Vol. 8, No. 4, 1996, pp. 189-206.
20. Reddy, S.Y., "HIDER: A Methodology for Early-Stage Exploration of Design Space," Advances in Design Automation (Dutta, D.), Irvine, CA, ASME, August 18-22, 1996. DETC96/DAC-1089.
21. Schonlau, M., Welch, W.J., and Jones, D.R., "Global Versus Local Search in Constrained Optimization of Computer Models," New Developments and Applications in Experimental Design (Flournoy, N., Rosenberger, W.F., and Wong, W.K.), Institute of Mathematical Statistics, pp. 11-25.
22. Sasena, M.J., Papalambros, P., and Goovaerts, P., Exploration of Metamodeling Sampling Criteria for Constrained Global Optimization, Engineering Optimization, Vol. 34, No. 3, 2002, pp. 263-278.
23. Cox, D.D. and John, S., SDO: A Statistical Method for Global Optimization, in Multidisciplinary Design Optimization: State of the Art (Alexandrov, N.M. and Hussaini, M.Y., eds), SIAM, Philadelphia, 1997, pp. 315-329.
24. Matheron, G., Principles of Geostatistics, Economic Geology, Vol. 58, 1963, pp. 1246-1266.
25. Sacks, J., Welch, W.J., Mitchell, T.J., and Wynn, H.P., Design and Analysis of Computer Experiments, Statistical Science, Vol. 4, No. 4, 1989, pp. 409-435.
26. Jin, R., Chen, W., and Simpson, T.W., Comparative Studies of Metamodeling Techniques under Multiple Modeling Criteria, Journal of Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, Vol. 23, No. 1, 2001, pp. 1-13.
27. Simpson, T.W., Maurey, T.M., Korte, J.J., and Mistree, F., Kriging Metamodels for Global Approximation in Simulation-Based Multidisciplinary Design Optimization, AIAA Journal, Vol. 39, No. 12, 2001, pp. 2233-2241.
28. Montes, P., Smoothing Noisy Data by Kriging with Nugget Effects, in Wavelets, Images and Surface Fitting (Laurent, P.J. and Le Mehaute, A., eds), A. K. Peters, Wellesley, MA, 1994, pp. 371-378.
29. Kleijnen, J.P.C. and Van Beers, A.B., "Kriging for Interpolation in Random Simulation," to appear in Journal of the Operational Research Society.
30. Koehler, J.R. and Owen, A.B., Computer Experiments, in Handbook of Statistics (Ghosh, S. and Rao, C.R., eds), Elsevier Science, New York, 1996, pp. 261-308.
31. Mitchell, T.J. and Morris, M.D., Bayesian Design and Analysis of Computer Experiments, Statistica Sinica, Vol. 2, 1992, pp. 359-379.
32. Sacks, J., Schiller, S.B., and Welch, W.J., Design for Computer Experiments, Technometrics, Vol. 31, No. 1 (February), 1989, pp. 41-47.
33. Meckesheimer, M., Booker, A.J., Barton, R.R., and Simpson, T.W., Computationally Inexpensive Metamodel Assessment Strategies," to appear in AIAA Journal, Vol. 40, No. 10, 2002.