Fast and accurate view classification of echocardiograms using deep learning

npj Digital Medicine

Volumn 1, Issue 1, 2018, Pages

  Madani, Ali ^a   Arnaout, Ramy ^b   Mofrad, Mohammad ^a   Arnaout, Rima ^c  

^a LAWRENCE BERKELEY NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

^b HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER AIDED ANALYSIS; DEEP LEARNING; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; NEURAL NETWORKS;

CLASSIFIEDS; COMPUTER ASSISTED; CONVOLUTIONAL NEURAL NETWORK; EMERGING TOOLS; LEARN+; MULTI-VIEWS; OVERFITTING; REAL-WORLD; STILL-IMAGES; TEST ACCURACY;

DATA VISUALIZATION;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; CLINICAL FEATURE; CONVOLUTIONAL NEURAL NETWORK; DEEP LEARNING; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MACHINE LEARNING; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TRANSTHORACIC ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; WORKFLOW;

EID: 85086330988     PISSN: None     EISSN: 23986352     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/s41746-017-0013-1     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Karpathy, A. The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Recurrent Neural Networks. http://karpathy.github.io/2015/05/21/rnn-effectiveness/ (2015)
2. Esteva, A. et al. Dermatologist-level classification of skin cancer with deep neural networks. Nature 542, 115–118 (2017)
3. Gulshan, V. et al. Development and validation of a deep learning algorithm for detection of diabetic retinopathy in retinal fundus photographs. JAMA 316, 2402–2410 (2016)
4. Litjens, G. et al. A survey on deep learning in medical image analysis. eprint at https://arxiv.org/pdf/1702.05747.pdf (2017)
5. Douglas, P. S. et al. ACCF/ASE/AHA/ASNC/HFSA/HRS/SCAI/SCCM/SCCT/SCMR 2011 appropriate use criteria for echocardiography. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 57, 1126–1166 (2011)
6. Wharton, G. et al. A minimum dataset for a standard adult transthoracic echocardiogram: a guideline protocol from the British Society of Echocardiography. Echo Res. Pract. 2, G9–G24 (2015)
7. Khamis, H. et al. Automatic apical view classification of echocardiograms using a discriminative learning dictionary. Med. Image Anal. 36, 15–21 (2017)
8. Knackstedt, C. et al. Fully automated versus standard tracking of left ventricular ejection fraction and longitudinal strain: the FAST-EFs multicenter study. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 66, 1456–1466 (2015)
9. Narula, S. et al. Machine-learning algorithms to automate morphological and functional assessments in 2D echocardiography. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 68, 2287–2295 (2016)
10. Park, J., Zhou, S. K., Simopoulos, C. & Comaniciu, D. AutoGate: fast and automatic Doppler gate localization in B-mode echocardiogram. Med. Image Comput. Comput. Assist. Interv. 11, 230–237 (2008)
11. Sengupta, P. P. et al. Cognitive machine-learning algorithm for cardiac imaging: a pilot study for differentiating constrictive pericarditis from restrictive cardiomyopathy. Circ. Cardiovasc. Imaging 9, 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.115.004330 (2016)
12. Gao, X. H., Li, W., Loomes, M. & Wang, L. Y. A fused deep learning architecture for viewpoint classification of echocardiography. Inf. Fusion 36, 103–113 (2017)
13. Penatti, O. A. et al. Mid-level image representations for real-time heart view plane classification of echocardiograms. Comput. Biol. Med. 66, 66–81 (2015)
14. Abadi, M. et al. TensorFlow: Large-scale machine learning on heterogeneous systems https://www.tensorflow.org/about/bib (2015)
15. Keras (GitHub, 2015)
16. Python Language Reference, version 2.7. Python Software Foundation (2017)
17. Russakovsky, O. et al. ImageNet large scale visual recognition challenge. Int. J. Comput. Vision 115, 211–252 (2015)
18. van der Maaten, L. & Hinton, G. Visualizing data using t-SNE. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 9, 2579–2605 (2008)