A conceptual precipitation-runoff modeling suite: Model selection, calibration and predictive uncertainty assessment

18th World IMACS Congress and MODSIM 2009 - International Congress on Modelling and Simulation: Interfacing Modelling and Simulation with Mathematical and Computational Sciences, Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 3556-3562

  Smith, T J ^a   Marshall, L A ^a  

^a MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Bayesian statistics; Markov chain Monte Carlo; Model calibration; Model selection; Snowmelt; Uncertainty assessment

Indexed keywords

BAYESIAN NETWORKS; CATCHMENTS; ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL EFFECTS; ESTIMATION; FORECASTING; GRAPHICAL USER INTERFACES; MARKOV CHAINS; MODEL STRUCTURES; MODULAR CONSTRUCTION; RUNOFF; SNOW; SNOW MELTING SYSTEMS; SOIL MOISTURE; STREAM FLOW; STRINGERS; STRUCTURE (COMPOSITION); WATERSHEDS;

COMPONENT STRUCTURE; FIRST-ORDER PROCESS; IDENTIFICATION OF MODEL; MARKOV CHAIN MONTE CARLO; PREDICTIVE PERFORMANCE; PREDICTIVE UNCERTAINTY; SNOW WATER EQUIVALENT; STRUCTURAL COMPLEXITY;

UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

EID: 85086234841     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (23)

1. Akaike, H. (1974), A new look at statistical model identification. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 19(6), 716-723.
2. Anderson, E.A. (1968), Development and Testing of Snow Pack Energy Balance Equations. Water Resources Research, 4(1), 19-37.
3. Bates, B.C., Campbell, E.P. (2001), A Markov chain Monte Carlo scheme for parameter estimation and inference in conceptual rainfall-runoff modeling. Water Resources Research, 37(4), 937-947.
4. Beven, K., Binley, A. (1992), The future of distributed models: Model calibration and uncertainty prediction. Hydrological Processes, 6(3), 279-298.
5. Beven, K. (1997), TOPMODEL: A critique. Hydrological Processes, 11(9), 1069-1085.
6. Blöschl, G., Kirnbauer, R. (1991), Point snowmelt models with different degrees of complexity - Internal processes. Journal of Hydrology, 129(1-4), 127-147.
7. Duan, Q., Sorooshian, S., Gupta, V. (1992), Effective and efficient global optimization for conceptual rainfall-runoff models. Water Resources Research, 28(4), 1015-1031.
8. Garen, D.C., Marks, D. (2005), Spatially distributed energy balance snowmelt modelling in a mountainous river basin: estimation of meteorological inputs and verification of model results. Journal of Hydrology, 315(1-4), 126-153.
9. Haario, H., Laine, M., Mira, A., Saksman, E. (2006), DRAM: Efficient adaptive MCMC. Statistics and Computing, 16(4), 339-354.
10. Jakeman, A.J., Hornberger, G.M. (1993), How much complexity is warranted in a rainfall-runoff model? Water Resources Research, 29(8), 2637-2649.
11. Jencso, K.G., McGlynn, B.L., Gooseff, M.N., Wondzell, S.M., Bencala, K.E., Marshall, L.A. (2009), Hydrologic connectivity between landscapes and streams: Transferring reach- and plot-scale understanding to the catchment scale. Water Resources Research, 45, W04428, doi:10.1029/2008WR007225.
12. Klemeš, V. (1986), Operational testing of hydrological simulation models. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 31(1), 13-24.
13. Madsen, H., Wilson, G., Ammentorp, H.C. (2002), Comparison of different automated strategies for calibration of rainfall-runoff models. Journal of Hydrology, 261(1-4), 48-59.
14. Manabe, S. (1969), Climate and the Ocean Circulation: 1. The Atmospheric Circulation and the Hydrology of the Earth's Surface. Monthly Weather Review, 97(11), 739-774.
15. Mantovan, P., Todini, E. (2006), Hydrological forecasting uncertainty assessment: Incoherence of the GLUE methodology. Journal of Hydrology, 330(1-2), 368-381.
16. Marshall, L., Nott, D., Sharma, A. (2004), A comparative study of Markov chain Monte Carlo methods for conceptual rainfall-runoff modeling. Water Resources Research, 40, W02501, doi:10.1029/2003WR002378.
17. Marshall, L., Nott, D., Sharma, A. (2005), Hydrological model selection: A Bayesian alternative. Water Resources Research, 41, W10422, doi:10.1029/2004WR003719.
18. Moore, R.J. (2007), The PDM rainfall-runoff model. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 11(1), 483-499.
19. Neuman, S.P. (2003), Maximum likelihood Bayesian averaging of uncertain model predictions. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 17(5), 291-305.
20. Ohmura, A. (2001), Physical basis for the temperature-based melt-index method. Journal of Applied Meteorology, 40(4), 753-763.
21. Rango, A., Martinec, J. (1995), Revisiting the degree-day method for snowmelt computations. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 31(4), 657-669.
22. Smith, T.J., Marshall, L.A. (2008), Bayesian methods in hydrology: A study of recent advancements in Markov chain Monte Carlo techniques. Water Resources Research, 44, W00B05, doi:10.1029/2007WR006705.
23. Wagener, T. (2003), Evaluation of catchment models. Hydrological Processes, 17(16), 3375-3378.