A quality checklist for technology-centred testing studies

13th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering, EASE 2009

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages

  Kitchenham, Barbara A ^a   Burn, Andrew J ^b   Li, Zhi ^a  

^a KEELE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b DURHAM UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Primary study quality; Quality checklists; Systematic literature review; Technology centred studies; testing

Indexed keywords

APPLICATION PROGRAMS;

EMPIRICAL STUDIES; QUALITY EVALUATION; RELIABILITY ASSESSMENTS; STUDY QUALITIES; SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW; TESTING STUDY; VALIDATION PROBLEM; VALIDATION PROCESS;

QUALITY CONTROL;

EID: 85085851074     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.14236/ewic/ease2009.15     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (13)

1. Bible, J., Rothermel, G., and Rosenblum, D.S. (2001) A Comparative Study of Coarse- and Fine-Grained Safe Regression Test Selection Techniques, ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology, 10(2), pp 149–183.
2. Brereton, O. P., Kitchenham, B.A. (2007) The Scope of EPIC Case Studies. EPIC technical Report EPIC-2007-01.
3. Briand, L.C. (2007) A critical Analysis of Empirical Research in Software Testing. Keynote Address, ESEM 2007, pp 1-8.
4. Budgen. D. (2008) Supporting Novices undertaking Systematic Literature Reviews. EPIC Case Study Protocol No: CS001/07, May.
5. Elbaum, S., Malishevsky, A.G. and Rothermel, G. (2002) Test case prioritization: A family of empirical studies. IEEE TSE, 28(2), pp 159-182.
6. Graves, T.L., Harold, M.J., Kim, J.M., Porter, A., and Rothermel, G. (2001) An Empirical Study of Regression Test Selection Techniques. ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology, 10(2), pp 184-208.
7. Kitchenham B.A. and Charters S.M. (2007). Guidelines for performing Systematic Literature Reviews in Software Engineering, Version 2.3. EBSE Technical Report EBSE-2007-01, Keele University and Durham University, July 2007.
8. Kitchenham B.A., Brereton, O. P., Budgen, D. and Li, Z. (2008) Results from Case Study 1 – Quality Checklists, EPIC Technical Report, EBSE 2008-009.
9. Kitchenham B.A., Brereton, O. P., Budgen, D. and Li, Z. (2009) An Evaluation of Quality Checklist Proposals – A participant-observer case study. EASE09, accepted for publication.
10. Mansour, N., Bahsoon, R., and Baradhi, G. (2001) Empirical comparison of regression test selection algorithms. JSS, 57, pp 79-90.
11. Offutt, A.J., Pan, J., Tewary, K., Zhang, T. (1995) An Experimental Evaluation of Data Flow and Mutation Testing, Software: Practice and Experience 26(2) pp 165-176.
12. Porwal, R. and Gursaran. (2004) An experimental evaluation of weak-branch criterion for class testing. JSS 70, pp 209-224.
13. Rothermel, G., Harrold, M.J. (1998) Empirical Studies of a Safe Regression Test Selection technique. IEEE TSE, 24(6), pp 401-419.