An evaluation of quality checklist proposals – A participant-observer case study

13th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering, EASE 2009

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages

  Kitchenham, Barbara A ^a   Brereton, O Pearl ^a   Budgen, David ^b   Li, Zhi ^a  

^a KEELE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b DURHAM UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Case study; Guidelines evaluation; Primary study quality; Quality checklists; Systematic literature review

Indexed keywords

SOFTWARE ENGINEERING;

GUIDELINES EVALUATION; PLANNING STAGES; QUALITY CRITERIA; SET OF QUESTIONS; STUDY QUALITIES; SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW; UNIT TESTING;

QUALITY CONTROL;

EID: 77956740113     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.14236/ewic/ease2009.7     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (9)

1. Brereton, O. P., Kitchenham, B.A. (2007) The Scope of EPIC Case Studies. EPIC technical Report EPIC-2007-01.
2. D. Budgen. (2008) Supporting Novices undertaking Systematic Literature Reviews. EPIC Case Study Protocol No: CS001/07, May.
3. Crombie, I.K. (1996) The Pocket Guide to Appraisal, BMJ Books, 1996.
4. Fink, A. (2005) Conducting Research Literature Reviews. From the Internet to Paper, Sage Publication, Inc., 2005.
5. Greenhalgh, Trisha. (2000) How to read a paper: The Basics of Evidence-Based Medicine. BMJ Books.
6. Kitchenham B.A. and Charters S.M. (2007). Guidelines for performing Systematic Literature Reviews in Software Engineering, Version 2.3. EBSE Technical Report EBSE-2007-01, Keele University and Durham University, July 2007.
7. Kitchenham B.A., Brereton, O. P., Budgen, D. and Li, Z. (2008) Results from Case Study 1 – Quality Checklists, EPIC Technical Report, EBSE 2008-009. http://www.dur.ac.uk/ebse/ebse-dev/tr.php.
8. Pettigrew, M. and Roberts, H. (2005) Systematic Reviews in the Social Sciences: A Practical Guide, Blackwell Publishing, 2005.
9. rd Edition, Sage Publications.