The Legal and Ethical Implications of Extraterritorial Processing of Asylum Seekers: The ‘Safe Third Country’ Concept

Forced Migration, Human Rights and Security

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 129-154

  Kneebone, Susan ^a  

^a MONASH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85085828173     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (32)

1. J Crisp, ‘Forced Displacement in Africa: Dimensions, Difficulties and Policy Directions’, UNHCR, New Issues in Refugee Research, Research Paper No 126 (July 2006) 11 states that 22 out of 38 protracted refugee situations are in Africa.
2. A Betts, ‘Towards a Mediterranean Solution? Implications for the Region of Origin’ (2006) 18 International Journal of Refugee Law 652 suggests that 100,000–120,000 migrants cross the Mediterranean illegally each year, the majority of whom come from sub-Saharan Africa.
3. UNHCR, The State of the World’s Refugees: Human Displacement in the New Millennium (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2006).
4. UNHCR, Refugees by Numbers (2006 edn) the number of refugees is now 8.4 million: see http://www.unhcr.org (accessed 29 April 2007).
5. Mr António Guterres, UNHCR, on the occasion of the European Council of Ministers of Justice and Home Affairs(Luxembourg, 12 October 2005) http://www.libertysecurity.org/article522.html (accessed 27 April 2007).
6. S Kneebone, ‘The Pacific Plan: The Provision of Effective Protection?’ (2006) 18 International Journal of Refugee Law 696.
7. K Hailbronner, ‘The Concept of “Safe Country” and Expeditious Asylum Procedures: A Western European Perspective’ (1993) 5 International Journal of Refugee Law 31.
8. S Legomsky, ‘Secondary Refugee Movements and the Return of Asylum Seekers to Third Countries: The Meaning of Effective Protection’ (2003) 15 International Journal of Refugee Law 567 at 570.
9. S Taylor, ‘Australia’s “Safe Third Country” Provisions: Their Impact on Australia’s Fulfillment of its Non-Refoulement Obligations’ (1996) 15 University of Tasmania Law Review 196.
10. T Magner, ‘A Less Than “Pacific” Solution for Asylum Seekers in Australia’ (2004) 16 International Journal of Refugee Law 53.
11. G Noll, ‘Seeking Asylum at Embassies: A Right of Entry under International Law?’ (2005) 17 International Journal of Refugee Law 542 at 548.
12. N Blake, ‘The Dublin Convention and the Rights of Asylum Seekers in the EU’ in E Guild and C Harlow (eds), Implementing Amsterdam: Immigration and Asylum Rights in EC Law (Oxford, Hart Publishing, 2001) 99.
13. A Edwards, ‘Human Rights, Refugees, and the Right to “Enjoy” Asylum’ (2005) 17 International Journal of Refugee Law 293.
14. Executive Committee Conclusion No 99 (LV), ‘General Conclusion on International Protection’ (2004) para (n), recalling Executive Committee Conclusion No 94 (LIII), ‘Civilian and Humanitarian Character of Asylum’ (2002).
15. L Barnett, ‘Global Governance and the Evolution of the International Refugee Regime’ (2002) 14 International Journal of Refugee Law 249.
16. UNHCR, The State of the World’s Refugees 2000: Fifty Years of Humanitarian Action (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2000) 79.
17. TA Aleinikoff, ‘State Centred Refugee Law: From Resettlement to Containment’ (1992) 14 Michigan Journal of International Law 120 at 125.
18. C Costello, ‘The Asylum Procedures Directive and the Proliferation of Safe Country Practices: Deterrence, Deflection and the Dismantling of International Protection?’ (2005) 7 European Journal of Migration and Law 35 at 39.
19. GS Goodwin-Gill, ‘Article 31 of the 1951 Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees: Non-Penalization, Detention, and Protection’ in E Feller, V Türk and F Nicholson (eds), Refugee Protection in International Law: UNHCR’s Global Consultations on International Protection (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2003) 216
20. J Crisp, ‘A New Asylum Paradigm? Globalization, Migration and the Uncertain Future of the International Refugee Regime’, UNHCR, New Issues in Refugee Research, Working Paper No 100 (2003) 9.
21. JC Hathaway, The Law of Refugee Status (Toronto, Butterworths, 1991) 46.
22. Vedsted-Hansen.A , ‘Non-Admission Policies and the Right to Protection: Refugees’ Choice versus States’ Exclusion?’ in F Nicholson and P Twomey (eds), Refugee Rights and Realities: Evolving International Concepts and Regimes (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1999).
23. S Kneebone, ‘The Rights of Strangers: Refugees, Citizenship and Nationality’ (2004) 10 Australian Journal of Human Rights 33.
24. UNHCR, ‘UNHCR Observations on the European Commission’s Proposal for a Directive on Common Standards and Procedures in Member States for Returning Illegally Staying Third-Country Nationals (COM (2005) 291 final)’ (December 2005).
25. UNHCR, ‘UNHCR’s Observations on the European Commission’s Proposal for a Council Regulation establishing the Criteria and Mechanisms for Determining the Member State Responsible for Examining an Asylum Application Lodged in One of the Member States by a Third Country National (COM (2001) 447 final)’ (February 2002) para 7.
26. F Whelan, ‘Citizenship and Freedom of Movement: An Open Admission Policy?’ in M Gibney (ed), Open Borders? Closed Societies?: The Ethical and Political Issues (Westport, CT, Greenwood Press, 1998).
27. M Walzer, Spheres of Justice: A Defence of Pluralism and Equality (Oxford, Martin Robertson, 1983) ch 2
28. J Carens, ‘The Case for Open Borders’ (1987) 49 The Review of Politics 251 represent the arguments for closed and open borders respectively.
29. P Singer and R Singer, ‘The Ethics of Refugee Policy’ in Gibney (n 105 above).
30. MJ Gibney, The Ethics and Politics of Asylum: Liberal Democracy and the Response to Refugees (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2004).
31. A Shacknove, ‘Who is a Refugee?’ (1985) 95 Ethics 274.
32. MJ Gibney, ‘Forced Migration, Engineered Regionalism and Justice between States’ in S Kneebone and F Rawlings-Sanaei (eds), New Regionalism and Asylum Seekers: Challenges Ahead (Oxford/New York, Berghahn Books, 2007).