Reproductive testing for disability

The Routledge Companion to Bioethics

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 417-432

  Asch, Adrienne ^b   Wasserman, David ^a  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85085818660     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203804971-45     Document Type: Chapter

References (73)

1. Albrecht, G.L. and Devlieger, G. (1999) “The Disability Paradox: High Quality of Life Against the Odds,” Social Science & Medicine 48: 977-88.
2. Asch, A. (1989) “Reproductive Technology and Disability,” in S. Cohen and N. Taub (eds.) Reproductive Laws for the 1990s, Clifton, NJ: Humana Press, pp. 69-124.
3. Asch, A. (1999) “Prenatal Diagnosis and Selective Abortion: A Challenge to Practice and Policy,” American Journal of Public Health 89 (11):1649-57.
4. Asch, A. (2000) “Why I Haven’t Changed My Mind about Prenatal Diagnosis: Reflections and Refinements,” in E. Parens and A. Asch (eds.) Prenatal Testing and Disability Rights, Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, pp. 234-58.
5. Asch, A. (2003) “Disability, Equality and Prenatal Testing: Contradictory or Compatible?" Florida State University Law Review 30 (2):315-42.
6. Asch, A. and Wasserman, D. (2005) “Where Is the Sin in Synecdoche: Prenatal Testing and the Parent-Child Relationship,” in D. Wasserman, R. Wachbroit and J. Bickenbach (eds.) Quality of Life and Human Difference: Genetic Testing, Health Care, and Disability, New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 172-216.
7. Asch, A. and Wasserman, D. (2009) “Informed Consent and Prenatal Testing: The Kennedy-Brownback Act,” Virtual Mentor 11 (9):721-4.
8. Asch, A. and Wasserman, D. (2010) “Making Embryos Healthy or Making Healthy Embryos: How Much of a Difference Between Prenatal Treatment and Selection?" in J. Nisker, K.A. Aschbrenner, J.S. Greenberg, S.A. Allen and M.M. Seltzer (2010) “Subjective Burden and Personal Gains Among Older Parents of Adults with Serious Mental Illness,” Psychiatric Services (Washington, DC) 61 (6): 605-11.
9. Baily, M.A. (2000) “Why I had Amniocentesis,” in E. Parens and A. Asch (eds.) Prenatal Testing and Disability Rights, Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, pp. 64-71.
10. Barnes, E. (2009) “Disability, Minority, and Difference,” Journal of Applied Philosophy 26 (4):337-55.
11. Blacher, J. and Baker, B.J. (2007) “Positive Impact of Intellectual Disabilities on Families,” American Journal on Mental Retardation, 112: 330-480.
12. Boardman, F.K. (2013) “Knowledge Is Power? The Role of Experiential Knowledge in Genetically ‘Risky’ Reproductive Decisions,” Sociology of Health & Illness 36: 137-50.
13. Botkin, J.R. (1995) “Fetal Privacy and Confidentiality,” Hastings Center Report 25 (5):32-9.
14. Brock, D.W. (2005) “Preventing Genetically Transmitted Disabilities while Respecting Persons with Disabilities,” in D. Wasserman, R. Wachbroit and J. Bickenbach (eds.) Quality of Life and Human Difference:Genetic Testing, Health Care, and Disability, New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 67-100.
15. Buchanan, A., Brock, D.W., Daniels, N. and Wikler, D. (2000) From Chance to Choice: Genetics & Justice, New York: Cambridge University Press.
16. Clarke, A. (1992) “Is Non-directive Genetic Counseling Possible?" Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey 47 (5):304-5.
17. Eisenhower, A.S., Baker, B.L. and Blacher, J. (2009) “Children’s Delayed Development and Behavior Problems:Impact on Mothers’ Perceived Physical Health Across Early Childhood,” Social Science & Medicine 68 (1):89-99.
18. Ferguson, P. (2001) “Mapping the Family: Disability Studies and the Exploration of Parental Response to Disability,” in G. Albrecht, K. Seelman and M. Bury (eds.) Handbook of Disability Studies, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, pp. 373-96.
19. Fine, M. and Asch, A. (1982) “The Question of Disability: No Easy Answers for the Women’s Movement, Reproductive Rights Newsletter 4 (3):19-20.
20. Gavaghan, C. (2007) “Right Problem, Wrong Solution: A Pro-choice Response to ‘Expressivist’ Concerns about Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis,” Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 16 (1):20-34.
21. Gedge, E. (2011) “Reproductive Choice and the Ideals of Parenting,” International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 4 (2):32-47.
22. Gerstein, E.D., Crnic, K.A., Blacher, J. and Baker, B.L. (2009) “Resilience and the Course of Daily Parenting Stress in Families of Young Children with Intellectual Disabilities,” Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 53 (12): 981-97.
23. Gill, C.J. (2000) “Health Professionals, Disability, and Assisted Suicide: An Examination of Empirical Evidence,” Psychology, Public Policy, and Law 6 (2):526-45.
24. Goering, S. (2008) "‘You Say You’re Happy, but…': Contested Quality of Life Judgments in Bioethics and Disability Studies,” Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 5 (2/3): 125-35.
25. Gottfreðsdóttir, H., Björnsdóttir, K. and Sandall, J. (2009a) “This Is Just What You Do When You Are Pregnant: A Qualitative Study of Prospective Parents in Iceland Who Accept Nuchal Translucency Screening,” Midwifery 25 (6):711-20.
26. Gottfreðsdóttir, H., Björnsdóttir, K. and Sandall, J. (2009b) “How Do Prospective Parents Who Decline Prenatal Screening Account for Their Decision? A Qualitative Study,” Social Science & Medicine 69 (2):274-7.
27. Green, R. (2008) Babies by Design: The Ethics of Genetic Choice, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
28. Hastings, R.P. and Taunt, H.M. (2002) “Positive Perceptions in Families of Children with Disabilities,” American Journal on Mental Retardation 107: 116-27.
29. Hatton, C., Emerson, E., Graham, H., Blacher, J. and Llewellyn, G. (2010) “Changes in Family Composition and Marital Status in Families with a Young Child with Cognitive Delay,” Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities 23: 14-26.
30. Herissone-Kelly, P. (2007) “The ‘Parental Love’ Objection to Nonmedical Sex Selection: Deepening the Argument,” Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 16 (4):446.
31. Herissone-Kelly, P. (2009) “Two Varieties of ‘Better-For’ Judgements,” in M.A. Roberts and D.T. Wasserman (2009) Harming Future Persons: Ethics, Genetics and the Nonidentity Problem, Dordrecht: Springer, 249-63.
32. Kelly, S.E. (2009) “Choosing Not to Choose: Reproductive Responses of Parents of Children with Genetic Conditions or Impairments,” Sociology of Health & Illness 31: 81-97.
33. Kittay, E.F. and Kittay, L. (2000) “On the Expressivity and Ethics of Selective Abortion for Disability: Conversations with My Son,” in E. Parens and A. Asch (eds.) Prenatal Testing and Disability Rights, Washington, DC:Georgetown University Press, pp. 165-95.
34. Klein, D.A. (2011) “Medical Disparagement of the Disability Experience: Empirical Evidence for the ‘Expressivist Objection,'" AJOB Primary Research 2: 8-20.
35. Kukla, R. and Wayne, K. (2011) “Pregnancy, Birth, and Medicine”, in E.N. Zalta (ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2011 edition). Available at: http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2011/entries/ethics-pregnancy/ (accessed July 29, 2014).
36. Le Dref, G., Grollemund, B., Danion-Grilliat, A. and Weber, J.C. (2013) “Towards a New Procreation Ethic:The Exemplary Instance of Cleft Lip and Palate,” Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 16: 365-75.
37. Lippman, A. and Wilfond, B.S. (1992) “Twice-Told Tales: Stories about Genetic Disorders,” American Journal of Human Genetics 51: 936-7.
38. Lopez-Rangel, E., Mickelson, E.C.R. and Lewis, M.E.S. (2008) “The Value of a Genetic Diagnosis for Individuals with Intellectual Disabilities: Optimising Healthcare and Function Across the Lifespan,” British Journal of Developmental Disabilities 54: 69-82.
39. Makela, N.L., Birch, P.H., Friedman, J.M. and Marra, C.A. (2009) “Parental Perceived Value of a Diagnosis for Intellectual Disability (ID): A Qualitative Comparison of Families with and without a Diagnosis for Their Child’s ID,” American Journal of Medical Genetics A 149A: 2393-402.
40. McDougall, R. (2007) “Parental Virtue: A New Way of Thinking about the Morality of Reproductive Actions,” Bioethics 21: 181-90.
41. McDougall, R. (2009) “Impairment, Flourishing and the Moral Nature of Parenthood,” in K. Brownlee and A. Cureton (eds.) Disability and Disadvantage, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 352-68.
42. Menzel, P., Dolan, P., Richardson, J. and Olsen, J.A. (2002) “The Role of Adaptation to Disability and Disease in Health State Valuation: A Preliminary Normative Analysis,” Social Science & Medicine 55 (12):2149-58.
43. Mundy, L. (2007) Everything Conceivable: How Assisted Reproduction Is Changing Men, Women, and the World, New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 319-20.
44. Murphy, T.F. (2011) “When Choosing the Traits of Children Is Hurtful to Others,” Journal of Medical Ethics 37 (2):105-8.
45. Nelson, J. (2000) “The Meaning of the Act: Reflections on the Expressive Force of Reproductive Decision Making and Politics,” in E. Parens and A. Asch (eds.) Prenatal Testing and Disability Rights, Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, pp. 196-213.
46. Nordenfelt, L. (1997) “The Importance of a Disability/Handicap Distinction,” Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 22: 607-22.
47. Parens, E. and Asch, A. (2000) “Introduction,” in Prenatal Testing and Disability Rights, Washington, DC:Georgetown University Press.
48. Prenatally and Postnatally Diagnosed Conditions Awareness Act (2008) 1810: 110-374.
49. Press, N. and Browner, C.H. (1997) “Why Women Say Yes to Prenatal Diagnosis,” Social Science & Medicine 45: 979-89.
50. Purdy, L. (1995) “Loving Future People,” in J. Callahan (ed.) Reproduction, Ethics and the Law, Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, pp. 300-27.
51. Reinders, H.S. (2000) The Future of the Disabled in Liberal Society: An Ethical Analysis, Notre Dame, IN:University of Notre Dame Press.
52. Ruddick, S. (1995) Maternal Thinking: Toward a Politics of Peace, Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
53. Ruddick, W. (2000) “Ways to Limit Prenatal Testing,” in E. Parens and A. Asch, (eds.) Prenatal Testing and Disability Rights, Washington DC: Georgetown University Press, pp. 95-107.
54. Saigal, S., Feeny, D., Rosenbaum, P., Furlong, W., Burrows, E. and Stoskopf, B. (1996) “Self-perceived Health Status and Health-Related Quality of Life of Extremely Low-Birth-Weight Infants at Adolescence,” Journal of the American Medical Association 276: 453-9.
55. Sandel, M.J. (2007) The Case Against Perfection, Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
56. Saxton, M. (1998) “Disability Rights and Selective Abortion,” in R. Solinger (ed.) Abortion Wars: A Half Century of Struggle, 1950-2000, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, pp. 374-94.
57. Schwartz, C.E., Andresen, E.M., Nosek, M.A. and Krahn, G.L. (2007) “Response Shift Theory: Important Implications for Measuring Quality of Life in People With Disability,” Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 88 (4), 529-36.
58. Seror, V. and Ville, Y. (2009) “Prenatal Screening for Down Syndrome: Women’s Involvement in Decision-Making and Their Attitudes to Screening,” Prenatal Diagnosis 29 (2):120-8.
59. Shaffer, B.L., Caughey, A.B. and Norton, M.E. (2006) “Variation in the Decision to Terminate Pregnancy in the Setting of Fetal Aneuploidy, Prenatal Diagnosis 26 (8):667-71.
60. Skotko, B.G. (2005) “Prenatally Diagnosed Down Syndrome: Mothers Who Continued Their Pregnancies Evaluate Their Health Care Providers,” American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology 192: 670-7.
61. Stabile, M. and Allin, S. (2012) “The Economic Costs of Childhood Disability,” The Future of Children 22 (1):65-96.
62. Steinbock, B. (2000) “Disability, Prenatal Testing, and Selective Abortion,” in E. Parens and A. Asch (eds.) Prenatal Testing and Disability Rights, Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, pp. 108-23.
63. The Boston Women’s Health Book Collective (2008) “Prenatal Testing,” in Our Bodies, Ourselves: Pregnancy and Birth, New York: Touchstone Book/Simon & Schuster, pp. 109-27.
64. Tremain, S. (2006) “Reproductive Freedom, Self-Regulation, and the Government of Impairment in Utero,” Hypatia 21 (1):35-53.
65. Wachbroit, R. and Wasserman, D. (1995) “Patient Autonomy and Value Neutrality in Nondirective Genetic Counseling,” Stanford Journal of Law and Social Policy 6 (2):103-11.
66. Walker, L.S., Ford, M.B. and Donald, W.D. (1987) “Cystic Fibrosis and Family Stress: Effects of Age and Severity of Illness,” Pediatrics 79: 239-46.
67. Walsh-Gallagher, D., Sinclair, M. and Mc Conkey, R. (2012) “The Ambiguity of Disabled Women’s Experiences of Pregnancy, Childbirth and Motherhood: A Phenomenological Understanding,” Midwifery 28 (2):156-62.
68. Wasserman, D. (2003) “A Choice of Evils in Prenatal Testing,” Florida Law Review 30 (2):295-313.
69. Wasserman, D. and Asch, A. (2007a) “A Response to Mahowald and Nelson,” Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 16 (4):468-75.
70. Wasserman, D. and Asch, A. (2007b) “Reply to Nelson,” Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 16 (4):478-82.
71. Wertz, D.C. (2000) “Drawing Lines: Notes for Policymakers,” in E. Parens and A. Asch (eds.) Prenatal Testing and Disability Rights, Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, pp. 261-87.
72. Wertz, D.C. and Fletcher, J.C. (1993) “A Critique of Some Feminist Challenges to Prenatal Diagnosis,” Journal of Women’s Health 2 (2):173-88.
73. Wilkinson, S. (2010) Choosing Tomorrow’s Children: The Ethics of Selective Reproduction, New York: Oxford University Press.