Adjoint and defect error bounding and correction for functional estimates

16th AIAA Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference

Volumn , Issue , 2003, Pages

  Pierce, Niles A ^a   Giles, Michael B ^b  

^a CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATION THEORY; DRAG; ERROR ANALYSIS;

4TH ORDER ACCURACY; ENTIRE SOLUTIONS; ESTIMATION APPROACHES; FUNCTIONAL ESTIMATE; NUMERICAL EXPERIMENTS; NUMERICAL RESULTS; SHARP ERROR BOUND; SUBSONIC CONDITIONS;

COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS;

EID: 85085778848     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.2514/6.2003-3846     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (39)

1. P. Monk and E. Süli. The adaptive computation of far field patterns by a posteriori error estimates of linear functionals. SIAM J. Numer. Anal., 36(1):251-274, 1998.
2. M.B. Giles and N.A. Pierce. Improved lift and drag estimates using adjoint Euler equations. In 14th AIAA Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference, 1999. AIAA Paper 99-3293.
3. N.A. Pierce and M.B. Giles. Adjoint recovery of superconvergent funtionals from PDE approximations. SIAM Review, 42(2):247-264, 2000.
4. M.B. Giles and N.A. Pierce. Adjoint error correction for integral outputs. In Lecture Notes in Computational Science & Engineering: Error Estimation and Adaptive Discretization Methods in Computational Fluid Dynamics, volume 25. Springer, 2002.
5. M.B. Giles. Defect and adjoint error correction. In N. Satofuka, editor, Computational Fluid Dynamics 2000. Springer, 2001.
6. D. Venditti and D. Darmofal. Grid adaptation for functional outputs: application to two-dimensional inviscid flows. J. Comput. Phys., 176:40-69, 2002.
7. D. Darmofal and D. Venditti. Anisotropic grid adaptation for functional outputs: application to two-dimensional viscous flows. J. Comput. Phys., 187:22-46, 2003.
8. I. Babuška and A. Miller. The post-processing approach in the finite element method - Part 1: calculation of displacements, stresses and other higher derivatives of the displacements. Intern. J. Numer. Methods Engrg., 20:1085-1109, 1984.
9. I. Babuška and A. Miller. The post-processing approach in the finite element method - part 2: the calculation of stress intensity factors. Intern. J. Numer. Methods Engrg., 20:1111-1129, 1984.
10. J.W. Barrett and C.M. Elliott. Total flux estimates for a finite-element approximation of elliptic equations. IMA J. Numer. Anal., 7:129-148, 1987.
11. C. Johnson, R. Rannacher, and M. Boman. Numerics and hydrodynamic stability - toward error control in computational fluid dynamics. SIAM J. Numer. Anal., 32(4):1058-1079, 1995.
12. M. Paraschivoiu, J. Peraire, and A. Patera. A posteriori finite element bounds for linear-functional outputs of elliptic partial differential equations. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. En-grg., 150(1-4):289-312, 1997.
13. J. Peraire and A.T. Patera. Bounds for linear-functional outputs of coercive partial differential equations: local indicators and adaptive refinement. In P. Ladeveze and J.T. Oden, editors, New Advances in Adaptive Computational Methods in Mechanics. Elsevier, 1997.
14. J.T. Oden and S. Prudhomme. New approaches to error estimation and adaptivity for the Stokes and Oseen equations. Internat. J. Numer. Methods Fluids, 31(1):3-15, 1999.
15. P. Houston, R. Rannacher, and E. Süli. A posteriori error analysis for stabilised finite element approximations of transport problems. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg., 190(11-12):1483- 1508, 2000.
16. R. Rannacher. Adaptive Galerkin finite element methods for partial differential equations. J. Comput. Appl. Math., 1-2:205-233, 2000.
17. R. Becker and R. Rannacher. An optimal control approach to error control and mesh adaptation. In A. Iserles, editor, Acta Numerica 2001. Cambridge University Press, 2001.
18. M.B. Giles and E. Süli. Adjoints methods for PDEs: a posteriori error analysis and postprocessing by duality. In A. Iserles, editor, Acta Numerica 2002, pages 145-236. Cambridge University Press, 2002.
19. A.T. Patera and J. Peraire. A general La-grangian formulation for the computation of a posteriori finite element bounds. In Adaptive Finite Element Approximation of Hyperbolic Problems, volume 25. Springer, 2002.
20. S. Prudhomme and J.T. Oden. Computable error estimators and adaptive techniques for fluid flow problems. In Adaptive Finite Element Approximation of Hyperbolic Problems, volume 25. Springer, 2002.
21. E. Süli and P. Houston. Adjoint error correction for integral outputs. In Adaptive Finite Element Approximation of Hyperbolic Problems, volume 25. Springer, 2002.
22. M.B. Giles and N.A. Pierce. Analytic adjoint solutions for the quasi-one-dimensional Euler equations. J. Fluid Mech., 426:327-345, 2001.
23. M.B. Giles and N.A. Pierce. On the properties of solutions of the adjoint Euler equations. In M. Baines, editor, Numerical Methods for Fluid Dynamics VI. ICFD, 1998.
24. S. Ulbrich. A sensitivity and adjoint calculus for discontinuous solutions of hyperbolic conservation laws with source terms. SIAM J. Control and Optim., 41(3):740-797, 2002.
25. S. Ulbrich. Adjoint-based derivative computations for the optimal control of discontinuous solutions of hyperbolic conservation laws. Systems & Control Letters, 48(3-4):313-328, 2003.
26. M.B. Giles. Discrete adjoint approximations with shocks. In T. Hou and E. Tadmor, editors, Proceedings of Ninth International Conference on Hyperbolic Problems. Springer-Verlag, 2003.
27. M.B. Giles and N.A. Pierce. Analysis of adjoint error correction for superconvergent functional estimates. SIAM J. Numer. Anal., submitted. Oxford University Computing Laboratory Report NA 01/14, 2001.
28. A. Jameson. Optimum aerodynamic design using control theory. Comput. Fluid Dynam. Rev., 3:495-528, 1995.
29. M.B. Giles and N.A. Pierce. Adjoint equations in CFD: duality, boundary conditions and solution behavior. In 13th Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference, Snowmass, CO, 1997. AIAA Paper 97-1850.
30. A. Jameson, N.A. Pierce, and L. Martinelli. Optimum aerodynamic design using the Navier-Stokes equations. Theor. Comput. Fluid Dyn., 10:213-237, 1998.
31. C.M. Bender and S.A. Orszag. Advanced Mathematical Methods for Scientists and Engineers. McGraw-Hill Inc, 1978.
32. J. Kevorkian and J.D. Cole. Perturbation Methods in Applied Mathetics. Number 34 in Applied Math Series. Springer-Verlag, 1981.
33. G. Dahlquist and A. Björck. Numerical Methods. Prentice-Hall, 1974.
34. A. Jameson, W. Schmidt, and E. Turkel. Numerical solution of the Euler equations by finite volume methods using Runge-Kutta time stepping schemes. AIAA Paper 81-1259, 1981.
35. A. Jameson. Solution of the Euler equations by a multigrid method. Appl. Math. Comput., 13:327-356, 1983.
36. A. Jameson. Aerodynamic design via control theory. J. Sci. Comput., 3:233-260, 1988.
37. C. de Boor. A Practical Guide to Splines. Springer, 2001.
38. H.W. Liepmann and A. Roshko. Elements of gas dynamics. Wiley, 1957.
39. G.K. Batchelor. An Introduction to Fluid Dynamics. Cambridge University Press, 1967.