A Bayesian belief updating model of phonetic recalibration and selective adaptation

Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics

Volumn 2011-June, Issue , 2011, Pages 10-19

  Kleinschmidt, Dave ^a   Jaeger, T Florian ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER   (United States)

^b University of Rochester   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACOUSTIC CUES; BAYESIAN; BELIEF UPDATING; RECALIBRATIONS; THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK;

LINGUISTICS;

EID: 85085762881     PISSN: 0736587X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (26)

1. Vikranth Rao Bejjanki, Meghan A Clayards, David C Knill, and Richard N Aslin. 2011. Cue Integration in Categorical Tasks: Insights from Audio-Visual Speech Perception. PLoS ONE, in press.
2. Paul Bertelson, Jean Vroomen, and Béatrice de Gelder. 2003. Visual recalibration of auditory speech identification: a McGurk aftereffect. Psychological Science, 14(6):592-597, November.
3. Ann R Bradlow and Tessa Bent. 2008. Perceptual adaptation to non-native speech. Cognition, 106(2):707-29, February.
4. Naama Brenner, William Bialek, and Rob de Ruyter Van Steveninck. 2000. Adaptive Rescaling Maximizes Information Transmission. Neuron, 26(3):695-702, June.
5. Matthew H Davis, Ingrid S Johnsrude, Alexis Hervais-Adelman, Karen Taylor, and Carolyn McGettigan. 2005. Lexical information drives perceptual learning of distorted speech: evidence from the comprehension of noise-vocoded sentences. Journal of experimental psychology. General, 134(2):222-41, May.
6. Marc O Ernst and Martin S Banks. 2002. Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion. Nature, 415(6870):429-33.
7. Naomi H Feldman, Thomas L Griffiths, and James L Morgan. 2009a. Learning phonetic categories by learning a lexicon. Proceedings of the 31st Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, pages 2208-2213.
8. Naomi H Feldman, Thomas L Griffiths, and James L Morgan. 2009b. The influence of categories on perception: explaining the perceptual magnet effect as optimal statistical inference. Psychological review, 116(4):752-82, October.
9. Alex B Fine, Ting Qian, T Florian Jaeger, and Robert A Jacobs. 2010. Is there syntactic adaptation in language comprehension? In ACL Workshop on Cognitive Modeling and Computational Linguistics, pages 18-26.
10. Stephen D Goldinger. 1998. Echoes of echoes? An episodic theory of lexical access. Psychological review, 105(2):251-79, April.
11. Khalil Iskarous, Carol A Fowler, and D H Whalen. 2010. Locus equations are an acoustic expression of articulator synergy. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 128(4):2021-32, October.
12. Robert A Jacobs and John K Kruschke. 2010. Bayesian learning theory applied to human cognition. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, pages n/a-n/a, May.
13. Robert A Jacobs. 2002. What determines visual cue reliability? Trends in cognitive sciences, 6(8):345-350, August.
14. David C Knill and Jeffrey A Saunders. 2003. Do humans optimally integrate stereo and texture information for judgments of surface slant? Vision Research, 43(24):2539-2558, November.
15. Tanya Kraljic and Arthur G Samuel. 2006. Generalization in perceptual learning for speech. Psychonomic bulletin & review, 13(2):262-8, April.
16. Tanya Kraljic and Arthur G Samuel. 2007. Perceptual adjustments to multiple speakers. Journal of Memory and Language, 56(1):1-15, January.
17. Tanya Kraljic, Arthur G Samuel, and Susan E Brennan. 2008. First impressions and last resorts: how listeners adjust to speaker variability. Psychological science: a journal of the American Psychological Society/APS, 19(4):332-8, April.
18. Harry McGurk and John MacDonald. 1976. Hearing lips and seeing voices. Nature, 264(5588):746-748.
19. Bob McMurray, Richard N Aslin, and Joseph C Toscano. 2009. Statistical learning of phonetic categories: insights from a computational approach. Developmental Science, 12(3):369-78, April.
20. Kevin P Murphy. 2007. Conjugate Bayesian analysis of the Gaussian distribution. Technical report, University of British Columbia.
21. Dennis Norris, James M McQueen, and Anne Cutler. 2003. Perceptual learning in speech. Cognitive Psychology, 47(2):204-238, September.
22. Joseph C Toscano and Bob McMurray. 2010. Cue integration with categories: Weighting acoustic cues in speech using unsupervised learning and distributional statistics. Cognitive science, 34(3):434-464, April.
23. Gautam K Vallabha, James L McClelland, Ferran Pons, Janet F Werker, and Shigeaki Amano. 2007. Unsupervised learning of vowel categories from infant-directed speech. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 104(33):13273-8, August.
24. Jean Vroomen, Sabine van Linden, Mirjam Keetels, Béatrice de Gelder, and Paul Bertelson. 2004. Selective adaptation and recalibration of auditory speech by lipread information: dissipation. Speech Communication, 44(1-4):55-61, October.
25. Jean Vroomen, Sabine van Linden, Béatrice de Gelder, and Paul Bertelson. 2007. Visual recalibration and selective adaptation in auditory-visual speech perception: Contrasting build-up courses. Neuropsychologia, 45(3):572-7, February.
26. Janet F Werker and Richard C Tees. 1984. Cross-language speech perception: Evidence for perceptual reorganization during the first year of life. Infant Behavior and Development, 7(1):49-63, January.