A model for the analysis of data-driven innovation and value generation in smart cities' ecosystems

Cities

Volumn 64, Issue , 2017, Pages 47-53

  Abella, Alberto ^a   Ortiz de Urbina Criado, Marta ^a   De Pablos Heredero, Carmen ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD REY JUAN CARLOS   (Spain)

Author keywords

Data reusability; Data driven innovation; Open government data; Public private collaboration; Smart cities

Indexed keywords

INNOVATION; MODELING; PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP; SMART CITY; URBAN ECOSYSTEM;

EID: 85085630830     PISSN: 02642751     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cities.2017.01.011     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Abella, A., Ortiz-de-Urbina-Criado, M., De-Pablos-Heredero, C., Meloda, a metric to assess open data reuse. El Profesional de la Información 23:6 (2014), 582–588 http://dx.doi.org/10.3145/epi.2014.nov.04 http://recyt.fecyt.es/index.php/EPI/article/view/34878/18857.
2. Abella, A., Ortiz-de-Urbina-Criado, M., De-Pablos-Heredero, C., Information reuse in smart cities' ecosystems. El Profesional de la Información 24:6 (2015), 838–844 http://dx.doi.org/10.3145/epi.2015.nov.16.
3. Abella, A., Ortiz-de-Urbina-Criado, M., De-Pablos-Heredero, C., The ecosystem of services around smart cities: An exploratory analysis. Procedia Computer Science 64 (2015), 1075–1080 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2015.08.554.
4. Al Nuaimi, E., Al Neyadi, H., Mohamed, N., Al-Jaroodi, J., Applications of big data to smart cities. Journal of Internet Services and Applications 6 (2015), 1–15 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13174-015-0041-5.
5. Angelidou, M., Smart cities: A conjuncture of four forces. Cities 47 (2015), 95–106 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2015.05.004.
6. Atz, U., The Tau of data: A new metric to assess the timeliness of data in catalogues. Parycek, P., Edelmann, N., (eds.) CeDEM15 Proceedings of the International Conference for E-Democracy and Open Government 2015 (pp. 257–267), 2014, Edition Donau-Universität Krems.
7. Bakici, T., Almirall, E., Wareham, J., A smart city initiative: The case of Barcelona. Journal of the Knowledge Economy 4:2 (2013), 135–148 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13132-012-0084-9.
8. Belanche, D., Casaló, L.V., Orús, C., City attachment and use of urban services: Benefits for smart cities. Cities 50 (2016), 75–81 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2015.08.016.
9. Benington, J., From private choice to public value. Benington, J., Moore, M.H., (eds.) Public value. Theory and practice, 2011, Palgrave MacMillan, UK, 31–49.
10. Berners-Lee, T., Linked data. Available online at World Wide Web Consortium site at https://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/LinkedData.html, 2009.
11. Caceres, R.A., Royds, K., Developer challenges as a platform for citizen engagement with open government data: The Australian case. Kumar, V., SvenssonJ, (eds.) Promoting social change and democracy through information technology (pp. 225–249), 2015, IGI Global http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-8502-4.ch010.
12. Carrara, W., San Chan, W., Fischer, S., Van Steenbergen, E., Creating value through open data: Study on the impact of re-use of public data resources. 2015, European Union http://dx.doi.org/10.2759/328101.
13. Cisco, VNI mobile forecast highlights, 2015–2020. Available online in http://www.cisco.com/assets/sol/sp/vni/forecast_highlights_mobile/index.html, 2015.
14. Da Cruz, N.F., Marques, R.C., Revisiting the determinants of local government performance. Omega 44 (2014), 91–103 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2013.09.002.
15. Dekkers, M., Polman, F., Te Velde, R., De Vries, M., MEPSIR (Measuring European Public Sector Information Resources). Final report of study on exploitation of public sector information – Benchmarking of EU framework conditions, executive summary and final report part 1 and part 2, 2006.
16. Diener, E., Suh, E., Measuring quality of life: Economic, social, and subjective indicators. Social Indicators Research 40:1–2 (1997), 189–216 http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1006859511756.
17. Emerson, J., Wachowicz, J., Chun, S., Social return on investment (SROI): Exploring aspects of value creation in the nonprofit sector. REDF-Box-Set-Vol.-2-SROI-Paper-2000, 2000, 131–173.
18. Fey, C., Birkinshaw, J., External sources of knowledge, governance mode and R&D performance. Journal of Management 31:4 (2005), 597–621 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0149206304272346.
19. Giffinger, R., Fertner, C., Kramar, H., Kalasek, R., Pichiler-Milanoviu, N., Meijers, E., Smart cities: Ranking of European medium-sized cities. 2007, Centre of Regional Science (SRF), Vienna University of Technology, Vienna, Austria http://www.smart-cities.eu/download/smart_cities_final_report.pdf.
20. Hall, R.E., The vision of a smart city. Proceedings of the 2nd International Life Extension Technology Workshop (Paris, France, Sep 28), 2000.
21. Hara, M., Nagao, T., Hannoe, S., Nakamura, J., New key performance indicators for a smart sustainable city. Sustainability 8:3 (2016), 1–19 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su8030206.
22. Hielkema, H., Hongisto, P., Developing the Helsinki smart city: The role of competitions for open data applications. Journal of the Knowledge Economy 4:2 (2013), 190–204 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13132-012-0087-6.
23. Hollands, R.G., Will the real smart city please stand up? Intelligent, progressive or entrepreneurial?. City 12:3 (2008), 303–320 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13604810802479126.
24. Huang, F., Rice, J., The role of absorptive capacity in facilitating open innovation outcomes: A study of Australian SMEs in the manufacturing sector. International Journal of Innovation Management 13:2 (2009), 201–220 http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/s1363919609002261.
25. Inauen, M., Schenker-Wicki, A., The impact of outside-in open innovation performance. European Journal of Innovation Management 14:4 (2011), 496–520 http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/14601061111174934.
26. Jetzek, T., Avital, M., Bjorn-Andersen, N., Generating sustainable value from open data in a sharing society. Bergvall-Kåreborn, B., Nielsen, P.A., (eds.) Creating Value for All Through IT. TDIT 2014, IFIP advances in information and communication technology, 429, 2014, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 62–82 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-43459-8_5.
27. Jetzek, T., Avital, M., Bjorn-Andersen, N., Data-driven innovation through open government data. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research 9:2 (2014), 100–120 http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/s0718-18762014000200008.
28. Kitchin, R., The real-time city? Big data and smart urbanism. GeoJournal 79:1 (2014), 1–14 http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2289141.
29. Kusiak, A., Innovation: A data-driven approach. International Journal of Production Economics 122:1 (2009), 440–448 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2009.06.025.
30. Kusiak, A., Tang, C.Y., Data-inspired innovation model. Proceedings of the 36th International Computers and Industrial Engineering Conference, 2006, 1–8.
31. Kylili, A., Fokaides, P.A., European smart cities: The role of zero energy buildings. Sustainable Cities and Society 15 (2015), 86–95 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2014.12.003.
32. Lee, G., Kwak, Y.H., An Open Government Maturity Model for social media-based public engagement. Government Information Quarterly 29:4 (2012), 492–503, 10.1016/j.giq.2012.06.001.
33. Marcos-Martín, C., Soriano-Maldonado, S.L., Reutilización de la información del sector público y open data en el contexto español y europeo. Proyecto Aporta. El profesional de la información 20:3 (2011), 291–297, 10.3145/epi.2011.may.07.
34. Moore, M.H., Creating public value: Strategic management in government. 1995, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA http://dx.doi.org/10.5860/choice.33-4147.
35. Morris, S., Shin, H.S., Social value of public information. The American Economic Review 92:5 (2002), 1521–1534 http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/000282802762024610.
36. Mulley, C., Moutou, C.J., Not too late to learn from the Sydney Olympics experience: Opportunities offered by multimodality in current transport policy. Cities 45 (2015), 117–122 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2014.10.004.
37. Nam, T., Pardo, T.A., Conceptualizing smart city with dimensions of technology, people, and institutions. Conference: Proceedings of the 12th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research, 2011, 282–291 http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2037556.2037602.
38. Nam, T., Pardo, T.A., Smart city as urban innovation: Focusing on management, policy, and context. ICEGOV 2011, Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance, 2011, 185–194 http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2072069.2072100.
39. Ojo, A., Curry, E., Zeleti, F.A., A tale of open data innovations in five smart cities. 2015 48th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2015, 2326–2335 http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2015.280.
40. Pira International (PIRA), Commercial exploitation of Europe's public sector information. 2000, European Commission, Directorate General for the Information Society, Brussels.
41. Porter, M.E., Kramer, M.R., The big idea: Creating shared value. Harvard Business Review 89:1 (2011), 3–17 http://hbr.org/2011/01/the-big-idea-creating-shared-value.
42. Red.es, Characterization study of the infomediary sector 2012. http://www.ontsi.red.es/ontsi/es/estudios-informes/estudio-de-caracterizaci%C3%B3n-del-sector-infomediario-en-espa%C3%B1-edici%C3%B3n-2012, 2012.
43. Red.es, Estudio de Caracterización del Sector Infomediario en España 2014 (Reutilización de Información del Sector Público). Available at http://www.ontsi.red.es/ontsi/es/estudios-informes/estudio-de-caracterizaci%C3%B3n-del-sector-infomediario-en-espa%C3%B1-2014-reutilizaci%C3%B3n-de-, 2015.
44. Schaffers, H., Komninos, N., Pallot, M., Trousse, B., Nilsson, M., Oliveira, A., Smart cities and the future internet: Towards cooperation frameworks for open innovation. Domingue, J. The Future Internet. FIA Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 6656, 2011, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 10.1007/978-3-642-20898-0_31.
45. Schleicher, J.M., Wien, T.U., Vogler, M., Dustdar, S., Inzinger, C., Enabling a Smart City Application Ecosystem. Internet of things, people and processes. IEEE Internet Computing 20:02 (2016), 58–65.
46. Stiglitz, J.E., Sen, A., Fitoussi, J.P., “The measurement of economic performance and social progress revisited”. Report by the Commission on the Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress. 2009, OECD.
47. Townsend, A.M., Smart cities: Big data, civic hackers, and the quest for a new utopia. 2013, Norton & Co., New York.
48. Tsai, K.H., Collaborative networks and product innovation performance: Toward a contingency perspective. Research Policy 38:5 (2009), 765–778 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2008.12.012.
49. Ubaldi, B., Open government data: Towards empirical analysis of open government data initiatives. OECD Working Papers on Public Governance, 22, 2013, OECD Publishing.
50. Un, C.A., Cuervo-Cazurra, A., Asakawa, K., R&D collaborations and product innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management 27:5 (2010), 673–689 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2010.00744.x.
51. Vanolo, A., Smartmentality: The smart city as disciplinary strategy. Urban Studies 51:5 (2014), 883–898 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0042098013494427.
52. Vanolo, A., Is there anybody out there? The place and role of citizens in tomorrow's smart cities. Futures 82 (2016), 26–36 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2016.05.010.
53. Vetrò, A., Canova, L., Torchiano, M., Orozco-Minotas, C., Iemma, R., Morando, F., Open data quality measurement framework: Definition and application to open government data. Government Information Quarterly 33:2 (2016), 325–337 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2016.02.001.
54. Vickery, G., Review of recent studies on PSI reuse and related market developments. Information Economics, 2011, EC DG Information Society, Paris.
55. Walravens, N., Qualitative indicators for smart city business models: The case of mobile services and applications. Telecommunications Policy 39:3–4 (2015), 218–240 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2014.12.011.
56. Washburn, D., Sindhu, U., Balaouras, S., Dines, R.A., Hayes, N.M., Nelson, L.E., Helping CIOs understand smart city initiatives: Defining the smart city, its drivers, and the role of the CIO. 2010, Forrester Research, Inc., Cambridge, MA.
57. Weiskopf, N.G., Weng, C., Methods and dimensions of electronic health record data quality assessment: Enabling reuse for clinical research. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 20:1 (2013), 144–151 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000681.
58. Wiig, A., Wyly, E., Introduction: Thinking through the politics of the smart city. Urban Geography 37:4 (2016), 485–493 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2016.1178479.