Identifying high-impact sub-structures for convolution kernels in document-level sentiment classification

50th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, ACL 2012 - Proceedings of the Conference

Volumn 2, Issue , 2012, Pages 338-343

  Tu, Zhaopeng ^a   He, Yifan ^b,c   Foster, Jennifer ^c   Van Genabith, Josef ^c   Liu, Qun ^a   Lin, Shouxun ^a  

^a INSTITUTE OF GEOLOGY AND GEOPHYSICS   (China)

^b POLYTECHNIC UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c DUBLIN CITY UNIVERSITY   (Ireland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONVOLUTION KERNEL; DEPENDENCY TREES; MACHINE-LEARNING; SENTIMENT CLASSIFICATION; SUB-STRUCTURES; SYNTACTIC INFORMATION; SYNTACTIC STRUCTURE; SYSTEMATIC STUDY;

COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS;

CONVOLUTION;

EID: 84869206519     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (23)

1. Apoorv Agarwal, Boyi Xie, Ilia Vovsha, Owen Rambow, and Rebecca Passonneau. 2011. Sentiment analysis of twitter data. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Languages in Social Media, pages 30-38. Association for Computational Linguistics.
2. Razvan Bunescu and Raymond Mooney. 2005a. A Shortest Path Dependency Kernel for Relation Extraction. In Proceedings of Human Language Technology Conference and Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 724-731, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, oct. Association for Computational Linguistics.
3. Razvan Bunescu and Raymond Mooney. 2005b. Subsequence Kernels for Relation Extraction. In Y Weiss, B Sch o lkopf, and J Platt, editors, Proceedings of the 19th Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, pages 171-178, Cambridge, MA. MIT Press.
4. Michael Collins and Nigel Duffy. 2001. Convolution kernels for natural language. In Proceedings of Neural Information Processing Systems, pages 625-632.
5. Marie-Catherine de Marneffe and Christopher D. Manning. 2008. The stanford typed dependencies representation. In Proceedings of the COLING Workshop on Cross-Framework and Cross-Domain Parser Evaluation, Manchester, August.
6. Paul Ferguson, Neil O'Hare, Michael Davy, Adam Bermingham, Paraic Sheridan, Cathal Gurrin, and Alan F. Smeaton. 2009. Exploring the use of paragraph-level annotations for sentiment analysis of financial blogs. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Opinion Mining and Sentiment Analysis.
7. Richard Johansson and Alessandro Moschitti. 2010. Syntactic and semantic structure for opinion expression detection. In Proceedings of the Fourteenth Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning, pages 67-76, Uppsala, Sweden, July.
8. Mahesh Joshi and Carolyn Penstein-Rose. 2009. Generalizing Dependency Features for Opinion Mining. In Proceedings of the ACL-IJCNLP 2009 Conference Short Papers, pages 313-316, Suntec, Singapore, jul. Suntec, Singapore.
9. Dan Klein and Christopher D Manning. 2003. Accurate Unlexicalized Parsing. In Proceedings of the 41st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 423-430, Sapporo, Japan, jul. Association for Computational Linguistics.
10. Moshe Koppel and Jonathan Schler. 2005. Using neutral examples for learning polarity. In Proceedings of International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI) 2005, pages 1616-1616.
11. Steve Lawrence, Kushal Dave, and David Pennock. 2003. Mining the peanut gallery: Opinion extraction and semantic classification of product reviews. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on World Wide Web, pages 519-528, ACM. ACM.
12. Jingjing Liu and Stephanie Seneff. 2009. Review Sentiment Scoring via a Parse-and-Paraphrase Paradigm. In Proceedings of the 2009 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 161- 169, Singapore, aug. Singapore.
13. Shotaro Matsumoto, Hiroya Takamura, and Manabu Okumura. 2005. Sentiment classification using word sub-sequences and dependency sub-trees. Proceedings of PAKDD'05, the 9th Pacific-Asia Conference on Advances in Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 3518/2005:21-32.
14. Alessandro Moschitti and Silvia Quarteroni. 2008. Kernels on Linguistic Structures for Answer Extraction. In Proceedings of ACL-08: HLT, Short Papers, pages 113-116, Columbus, Ohio, jun. Association for Computational Linguistics.
15. Alessandro Moschitti, Daniele Pighin, and Roberto Basili. 2008. Tree kernels for semantic role labeling. Computational Linguistics, 34(2):193-224.
16. Alessandro Moschitti. 2006. Efficient Convolution Kernels for Dependency and Constituent Syntactic Trees. In Proceedings of the 17th European Conference on Machine Learning, pages 318-329, Berlin, Germany, sep. Machine Learning: ECML 2006, 17th European Conference on Machine Learning, Proceedings.
17. Vincent Ng, Sajib Dasgupta, and S M Niaz Arifin. 2006. Examining the Role of Linguistic Knowledge Sources in the Automatic Identification and Classification of Reviews. In Proceedings of the COLING/ACL 2006 Main Conference Poster Sessions, pages 611-618, Sydney, Australia, jul. Sydney, Australia.
18. Truc-Vien T Nguyen, Alessandro Moschitti, and Giuseppe Riccardi. 2009. Convolution kernels on constituent, dependency and sequential structures for relation extraction. Proceedings of the 2009 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 1378-1387.
19. Bo Pang and Lillian Lee. 2004. A Sentimental Education: Sentiment Analysis Using Subjectivity Summarization Based on Minimum Cuts. In Proceedings of the 42nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 271-278, Barcelona, Spain, jun. Barcelona, Spain.
20. Michael Wiegand and Dietrich Klakow. 2010. Convolution Kernels for Opinion Holder Extraction. In Human Language Technologies: The 2010 Annual Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 795-803, Los Angeles, California, jun. Los Angeles, California.
21. Theresa Wilson, Janyce Wiebe, and Paul Hoffmann. 2005. Recognizing Contextual Polarity in Phrase- Level Sentiment Analysis. In Proceedings of Human Language Technology Conference and Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 347-354, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, oct. Association for Computational Linguistics.
22. Hong Yu and Vasileios Hatzivassiloglou. 2003. Towards answering opinion questions: Separating facts from opinions and identifying the polarity of opinion sentences. In Proceedings of the 2003 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 129-136, Association for Computational Linguistics. Association for Computational Linguistics.
23. Min Zhang, Jie Zhang, Jian Su, and Guodong Zhou. 2006. A Composite Kernel to Extract Relations between Entities with Both Flat and Structured Features. In Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Computational Linguistics and 44th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 825-832, Sydney, Australia, jul. Association for Computational Linguistics.