Effective performance metrics for evaluating activity recognition methods

24th International Conference on Architecture of Computing Systems 2011, ARCS 2011 - Workshop Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 301-310

  van Kasteren, T L M ^a   Alemdar, Hande ^a   Ersoy, Cem ^a  

^a BOGAZICI UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER PROGRAMMING; COMPUTER SCIENCE;

ACTIVITY RECOGNITION; CLASS IMBALANCE; EFFECTIVE PERFORMANCE; PROBABILISTIC MODELS; REAL-WORLD DATASETS; TEMPORAL DATA;

PATTERN RECOGNITION;

EID: 85083888830     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. C. M. Bishop. Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning (Information Science and Statistics). Springer-Verlag New York, Inc., Secaucus, NJ, USA, August 2006.
2. D. Freitag and A. McCallum. Information extraction with HMMs and shrinkage. In Proceedings of the AAAI-99 Workshop on Machine Learning for Information Extraction, pages 31-36. Orlando, Florida, 1999.
3. B. Kosucu, K. Irgan, G. Kucuk, and S. Baydere. Firesensetb: a wireless sensor networks testbed for forest fire detection. In Proceedings of the 2009 International Conference on Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing: Connecting the World Wirelessly, IWCMC'09, pages 1173-1177, New York, NY, USA, 2009. ACM.
4. D. C. Liu and J. Nocedal. On the limited memory bfgs method for large scale optimization. Math. Program., 45(3):503-528, 1989.
5. T. Minka. Discriminative models, not discriminative training. Technical report, Microsoft Research Cambridge, 2005.
6. D. Minnen, T. Westeyn, T. Starner, J. A. Ward, and P. Lukowicz. Performance metrics and evaluation issues for continuous activity recognition. In Performance metrics for Intelligent Systems, 2006.
7. A. Ng and M. Jordan. On discriminative vs. generative classifiers: A comparison of logistic regression and naive bayes. Advances in neural information processing systems, 2:841-848, 2002.
8. L. R. Rabiner. A tutorial on hidden markov models and selected applications in speech recognition. Proceedings of the IEEE, 77(2):257-286, 1989.
9. I. Rish. An empirical study of the naive bayes classifier. In IJCAI 2001 workshop on empirical methods in artificial intelligence, pages 41-46, 2001.
10. F. Sha and F. Pereira. Shallow parsing with conditional random fields. In NAACL'03: Proceedings of the 2003 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics on Human Language Technology, pages 134-141, Morristown, NJ, USA, 2003. Association for Computational Linguistics.
11. C. Sutton and A. McCallum. Introduction to Statistical Relational Learning, chapter 1: An introduction to Conditional Random Fields for Relational Learning, page (Available online). MIT Press, 2006.
12. D. L. Vail and M. M. Veloso. Feature selection for activity recognition in multi-robot domains. In Proceedings of the 23rd national conference on Artificial intelligence - Volume 3, pages 1415-1420. AAAI Press, 2008.
13. T. van Kasteren, G. Englebienne, and B. Kröse. Activity recognition using semi-markov models on real world smart home datasets. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Smart Environments, 2(3):311-325, 2010.
14. T. van Kasteren, G. Englebienne, and B. Kröse. Human activity recognition from wireless sensor network data: Benchmark and software. In L. Chen, C. Nugent, J. Biswas, and J. Hoey, editors, Activity Recognition in Pervasive Intelligent Environments, Atlantis Ambient and Pervasive Intelligence series. Atlantis Press, 2010.
15. T. van Kasteren, A. Noulas, G. Englebienne, and B. Kröse. Accurate activity recognition in a home setting. In UbiComp'08: Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Ubiquitous computing, pages 1-9, New York, NY, USA, 2008. ACM.
16. J. A. Ward, P. Lukowicz, and H. W. Gellersen. Performance metrics for activity recognition. ACM Transactions on Computational Logic, 2(1):111-133, 2011.
17. Website. Firesense: http://www.firesense.eu/.