Feature selection for activity recognition in multi-robot domains

Proceedings of the National Conference on Artificial Intelligence

Volumn 3, Issue , 2008, Pages 1415-1420

  Vail, Douglas L ^a   Veloso, Manuela M ^a  

^a Carnegie Mellon University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; BIONICS; CONTENT BASED RETRIEVAL; IMAGE SEGMENTATION; INDUSTRIAL ROBOTS; MULTIPURPOSE ROBOTS; ROBOTICS;

ACTIVITY RECOGNITIONS; CONDITIONAL RANDOM FIELDS; DO-MAINS; FEATURE SELECTION ALGORITHMS; FEATURE SELECTION METHODS; FEATURE SELECTIONS; GREEDY FORWARDS; RANDOM FIELDS; ROBOCUP; ROBOT SETTINGS; ROBOT SOCCERS; SELECTION STRATEGIES; SENSORY DATUMS; TEMPORAL MODELS;

ROBOTS;

EID: 57749096979     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. Andrew, G., and Gao, J. 2007. Scalable training of L1-regularized log-linear models. Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Machine learning 33-40.
2. Blum, A., and Langley, P. 1997. Selection of relevant features and examples in machine learning. Artificial Intelligence 97(1-2):245-271.
3. Bruce, J. R.; Veloso, M.; and Zickler, S. 2008. CMDragons: Dynamic Passing and Strategy on a Champion Robot Soccer Team. In Proceedings of ICRA '2008.
4. Freund, Y., and Schapire, R. 1996. Experiments with a new boosting algorithm. Machine Learning: Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Conference 148:156.
5. Han, K., and Veloso, M. 2000. Automated robot behavior recognition applied to robotic soccer. In Hollerbach, J., and Koditschek, D., eds., Robotics Research: the Ninth International Symposium. London: Springer-Verlag. 199-204.
6. Hastie, T.; Tibshirani, R.; and Friedman, J. H. 2001. The Elements of Statistical Learning. Springer.
7. Kitano, H., ed. 1998. RoboCup-97: Robot Soccer World Cup I. London, UK: Springer-Verlag.
8. Koh, K.; Kim, S.; and Boyd, S. 2006. An interior-point method for large-scale 11-regularized logistic regression. Under Submission.
9. Lafferty, J.; McCallum, A.; and Pereira, F. 2001. Conditional random fields: Probabilistic models for segmenting and labeling sequence data. In Proc. 18th International Conf. on Machine Learning, 282-289. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, CA.
10. Liao, L.; Choudhury, T.; Fox, D.; and Kautz, H. 2007. Training conditional random fields using virtual evidence boosting. In IJCAI, 2530-2535.
11. McCallum, A. 2003. Efficiently inducing features of conditional random fields. Nineteenth Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (UA103).
12. Murphy, K.; Weiss, Y.; and Jordan, M. 1999. Loopy belief propagation for approximate inference: An empirical study. Proceedings of Uncertainty in AI 467-475.
13. Ng, A. Y., and Jordan, M. I. 2002. On discriminative vs. generative classifiers: A comparison of logistic regression and naive bayes. In Dietterich, T. G.; Becker, S.; and Ghahramani, Z., eds., Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 14, 841-848. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
14. Perkins, S.; Lacker, K.; and Theiler, J. 2003. Grafting: fast, incremental feature selection by gradient descent in function space. The Journal of Machine Learning Research 3:1333-1356.
15. Sutton, C., and McCallum, A. 2006. An introduction to conditional random fields for relational learning. In Getoor, L., and Taskar, B., eds., Introduction to Statistical Relational Learning. MIT Press.
16. Sutton, C.; McCallum, A.; and Rohanimanesh, K. 2007. Dynamic conditional random fields: Factorized probabilistic models for labeling and segmenting sequence data. The Journal of Machine Learning Research 8:693-723.
17. Vail, D. L.; Lafferty, J. D.; and Veloso, M. M. 2007. Feature selection in conditional random fields for activity recognition. In IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS).
18. Vail, D. L.; Veloso, M. M.; and Lafferty, J. D. 2007. Conditional random fields for activity recogntion. In AAMAS.