Behaviour change techniques associated with smoking cessation in intervention and comparator groups of randomized controlled trials: a systematic review and meta-regression

Addiction

Volumn 115, Issue 11, 2020, Pages 2008-2020

  Black, Nicola ^a,b   Johnston, Marie ^a   Michie, Susan ^c   Hartmann Boyce, Jamie ^d   West, Robert ^c   Viechtbauer, Wolfgang ^e   Eisma, Maarten C ^a,f   Scott, Claire ^a,g   de Bruin, Marijn ^a,h  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ABERDEEN   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

^c UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^d UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^e MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^f UNIVERSITY OF GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

^g NHS EDUCATION FOR SCOTLAND   (United Kingdom)

^h RADBOUD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Behaviour change technique; control group; dual process theory; meta analysis; meta regression; smoking cessation; systematic review

Indexed keywords

ADULT; BEHAVIOR THERAPY; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HUMAN; MALE; META ANALYSIS; MIDDLE AGED; PROCEDURES; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); SMOKING CESSATION; TOBACCO DEPENDENCE;

ADULT; BEHAVIOR THERAPY; DELIVERY OF HEALTH CARE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC; SMOKING CESSATION; TOBACCO USE DISORDER;

EID: 85083443134     PISSN: 09652140     EISSN: 13600443     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/add.15056     Document Type: Review

References (55)

1. Gakidou E., Afshin A., Abajobir A. A., Abate K. H., Abbafati C., Abbas K. M. et al. Global, regional, and national comparative risk assessment of 84 behavioural, environmental and occupational, and metabolic risks or clusters of risks, 1990–2016: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2016. Lancet 2017; 390: 1345–1422.
2. Lancaster T., Stead L. F. Individual behavioural counselling for smoking cessation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017; 3: CD001292.
3. Stead L. F., Carroll A. J., Lancaster T. Group behaviour therapy programmes for smoking cessation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017; 3: CD0001007.
4. Taylor G. M., Dalili M. N., Semwal M., Civljak M., Sheikh A., Car J. Internet-based interventions for smoking cessation. The Cochrane Library 2017; 9: CD007078.
5. Whittaker R., McRobbie H., Bullen C., Borland R., Rodgers A., Gu Y. Mobile phone-based interventions for smoking cessation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012; 11: CD006611.
6. McCrabb S., Baker A. L., Attia J., Skelton E., Twyman L., Palazzi K. et al. Internet-based programs incorporating behavior change techniques are associated with increased smoking cessation in the general population: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Behav Med 2018; 53: 180–195.
7. Griffiths S. E., Parsons J., Fulton E. A., Naughton F., Tombor I., Brown K. E. Are digital interventions for smoking cessation in pregnancy effective? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Health Psychol Rev 2018; 12: 333–356.
8. Bartlett Y. K., Sheeran P., Hawley M. S. Effective behaviour change techniques in smoking cessation interventions for people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a meta-analysis. Br J Health Psychol 2014; 19: 181–203.
9. Prestwich A., Moore S., Kotze A., Budworth L., Lawton R., Kellar I. How can smoking cessation be induced before surgery? A systematic review and meta-analysis of behavior change techniques and other intervention characteristics. Front Psychol 2017; 8: 915.
10. Michie S., Richardson M., Johnston M., Abraham C., Francis J., Hardeman W. et al. The behavior change technique taxonomy (v1) of 93 hierarchically clustered techniques: building an international consensus for the reporting of behavior change interventions. Ann Behav Med 2013; 46: 81–95.
11. Stavri Z., Michie S. Classification systems in behavioural science: current systems and lessons from the natural, medical and social sciences. Health Psychol Rev 2012; 6: 113–140.
12. Garnett C. V., Crane D., Brown J., Kaner E. F., Beyer F. R., Muirhead C. R. et al. Behavior change techniques used in digital behavior change interventions to reduce excessive alcohol consumption: a meta-regression. Ann Behav Med 2018; 52: 530–543.
13. Kassavou A., Sutton S. Automated telecommunication interventions to promote adherence to cardio-metabolic medications: meta-analysis of effectiveness and meta-regression of behaviour change techniques. Health Psychol Rev 2018; 12: 25–42.
14. Nyman S. R., Adamczewska N., Howlett N. Systematic review of behaviour change techniques to promote participation in physical activity among people with dementia. Br J Health Psychol 2018; 23: 148–170.
15. Samdal G. B., Eide G. E., Barth T., Williams G., Meland E. Effective behaviour change techniques for physical activity and healthy eating in overweight and obese adults; systematic review and meta-regression analyses. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2017; 14: 42.
16. Meade L. B., Bearne L. M., Sweeney L. H., Alageel S. H., Godfrey E. L. Behaviour change techniques associated with adherence to prescribed exercise in patients with persistent musculoskeletal pain: systematic review. Br J Health Psychol 2019; 24: 10–30.
17. Cradock K. A., ÓLaighin G., Finucane F. M., Gainforth H. L., Quinlan L. R., Ginis K. A. M. Behaviour change techniques targeting both diet and physical activity in type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2017; 14: 18.
18. Bull E. R., McCleary N., Li X., Dombrowski S. U., Dusseldorp E., Johnston M. Interventions to promote healthy eating, physical activity and smoking in low-income groups: a systematic review with meta-analysis of behavior change techniques and delivery/context. Int J Behav Med 2018; 25: 605–616.
19. Duff O. M., Walsh D. M., Furlong B. A., O'Connor N. E., Moran K. A., Woods C. B. Behavior change techniques in physical activity ehealth interventions for people with cardiovascular disease: systematic review. J Med Internet Res 2017; 19: e281.
20. Roberts H., McEachan R., Margary T., Conner M., Kellar I. Identifying effective behavior change techniques in built environment interventions to increase use of green space: a systematic review. Environ Behav 2018; 50: 28–55.
21. Hansen C. R., O'Mahony D., Kearney P. M., Sahm L. J., Cullinan S., Huibers C. et al. Identification of behaviour change techniques in deprescribing interventions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2018; 84: 2716–2728.
22. Howlett N., Trivedi D., Troop N. A., Chater A. M. Are physical activity interventions for healthy inactive adults effective in promoting behavior change and maintenance, and which behavior change techniques are effective? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Transl Behav Med 2018; 9: 147–157.
23. Edwards E. A., Lumsden J., Rivas C., Steed L., Edwards L., Thiyagarajan A. et al. Gamification for health promotion: systematic review of behaviour change techniques in smartphone apps. BMJ Open 2016; 6: e012447.
24. Direito A., Carraça E., Rawstorn J., Whittaker R., Maddison R. mHealth technologies to influence physical activity and sedentary behaviors: behavior change techniques, systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Ann Behav Med 2016; 51: 226–239.
25. de Bruin M., Black N., Javornik N., Viechtbauer W., Eisma M. C., Hartmann-Boyce J. et al. Underreporting of the active content of behavioural interventions: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials of smoking cessation interventions. Health Psychol Rev 202010.1080/17437199.2019.1709098.
26. Black N., Eisma M. C., Viechtbauer W., Johnston M., West R., Hartmann-Boyce J. et al. Variability and effectiveness of comparator group interventions in smoking cessation trials: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Addiction 202010.1111/add.14969.
27. Peters G.-J. Y., de Bruin M., Crutzen R. Everything should be as simple as possible, but no simpler: towards a protocol for accumulating evidence regarding the active content of health behaviour change interventions. Health Psychol Rev 2015; 9: 1–14.
28. Hofmann W., Friese M., Wiers R. W. Impulsive versus reflective influences on health behavior: a theoretical framework and empirical review. Health Psychol Rev 2008; 2: 111–137.
29. Strack F., Deutsch R. Reflective and impulsive determinants of social behavior. Pers Soc Psychol Rev 2004; 8: 220–247.
30. Hall P. A., Fong G. T. Temporal self-regulation theory: a model for individual health behavior. Health Psychol Rev 2007; 1: 6–52.
31. Ng M., Freeman M. K., Fleming T. D., Robinson M., Dwyer-Lindgren L., Thomson B. et al. Smoking prevalence and cigarette consumption in 187 countries, 1980-2012. JAMA 2014; 311: 183–192.
32. Weinberger A. H., Gbedemah M., Wall M. M., Hasin D. S., Zvolensky M. J., Goodwin R. D. Cigarette use is increasing among people with illicit substance use disorders in the United States, 2002–14: emerging disparities in vulnerable populations. Addiction 2018; 113: 719–728.
33. Lê Cook B., Wayne G. F., Kafali E. N., Liu Z., Shu C., Flores M. Trends in smoking among adults with mental illness and association between mental health treatment and smoking cessation. JAMA 2014; 311: 172–182.
34. John U., Meyer C., Hapke U., Rumpf H.-J., Schumann A. Nicotine dependence, quit attempts, and quitting among smokers in a regional population sample from a country with a high prevalence of tobacco smoking. Prev Med 2004; 38: 350–358.
35. Sinha D. N., Suliankatchi R. A., Amarchand R., Krishnan A. Prevalence and sociodemographic determinants of any tobacco use and dual use in six countries of the WHO South-East Asia region: findings from the demographic and health surveys. Nicotine Tob Res 2016; 18: 750–756.
36. de Bruin M., Viechtbauer W., Eisma M. C., Hartmann-Boyce J., West R., Bull E. et al. Identifying effective behavioural components of intervention and comparison group support provided in SMOKing cEssation (IC-SMOKE) interventions: a systematic review protocol. Syst Rev 2016; 5: 77.
37. Moher D., Liberati A., Tetzlaff J., Altman D. G. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med 2009; 151: 264–269.
38. de Bruin M., Viechtbauer W., Hospers H. J., Schaalma H. P., Kok G. Standard care quality determines treatment outcomes in control groups of HAART-adherence intervention studies: implications for the interpretation and comparison of intervention effects. Health Psychol 2009; 28: 668–674.
39. Black N., Williams A. J., Javornik N., Scott C., Johnston M., Eisma M. C. et al. Enhancing behavior change technique coding methods: identifying behavioral targets and delivery styles in smoking cessation trials. Ann Behav Med 2019; 53: 583–591.
40. Altman D. G. Practical statistics for medical research. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 1990.
41. West R., Hajek P., Stead L., Stapleton J. Outcome criteria in smoking cessation trials: proposal for a common standard. Addiction 2005; 100: 299–303.
42. Konstantopoulos S. Fixed effects and variance components estimation in three-level meta-analysis. Res Synth Methods 2011; 2: 61–76.
43. Ishak K. J., Platt R. W., Joseph L., Hanley J. A., Caro J. J. Meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Clin Trials 2007; 4: 525–539.
44. Trikalinos T. A., Olkin I. Meta-analysis of effect sizes reported at multiple time points: a multivariate approach. Clin Trials 2012; 9: 610–620.
45. Viechtbauer W. Conducting meta-analyses in R with the metafor package. J Stat Softw 2010; 36: 1–48.
46. Harrell F. E. Regression modeling strategies: With applications to linear models, logistic and ordinal regression, and survival analysis. New York: Springer; 2015.
47. Beavers A. S., Lounsbury J. W., Richards J. K., Huck S. W., Skolits G. J., Esquivel S. L. Practical considerations for using exploratory factor analysis in educational research. Pract Assess Res Eval 2013; 18: 6.
48. Ferguson E., Cox T. Exploratory factor analysis: a users’ guide. Int J Self Assess 1993; 1: 84–94.
49. Heatherton T. F., Kozlowski L. T., Frecker R. C., Fagerström K.-O. The Fagerström Test for Nicotine Dependence: a revision of the Fagerstrom Tolerance Questionnaire. Br J Addict 1991; 86: 1119–1127.
50. Kwasnicka D., Dombrowski S. U., White M., Sniehotta F. Theoretical explanations for maintenance of behaviour change: a systematic review of behaviour theories. Health Psychol Rev 2016; 10: 277–296.
51. Webb T. L., Joseph J., Yardley L., Michie S. Using the internet to promote health behavior change: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the impact of theoretical basis, use of behavior change techniques, and mode of delivery on efficacy. J Med Internet Res 2010; 12: e4.
52. Black N., Mullan B., Sharpe L. Computer-delivered interventions for reducing alcohol consumption: meta-analysis and meta-regression using behaviour change techniques and theory. Health Psychol Rev 2016; 10: 341–357.
53. Hartmann-Boyce J., Lancaster T., Stead L. F. Print-based self-help interventions for smoking cessation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014; 3: CD001118.
54. Wood L., Egger M., Gluud L. L., Schulz K. F., Jüni P., Altman D. G. et al. Empirical evidence of bias in treatment effect estimates in controlled trials with different interventions and outcomes: meta-epidemiological study. BMJ 2008; 336: 601–605.
55. Savović J., Jones H., Altman D., Harris R., Jüni P., Pildal J. et al. Influence of reported study design characteristics on intervention effect estimates from randomised controlled trials: combined analysis of meta-epidemiological studies. Health Technol Assess 2012; 16: 1–82.