Enhancing behavior change technique coding methods: Identifying behavioral targets and delivery styles in smoking cessation trials

Annals of Behavioral Medicine

Volumn 53, Issue 6, 2019, Pages 583-591

  Black, Nicola ^a   Williams, A Jess ^a,b   Javornik, Neza ^a   Scott, Claire ^a,c   Johnston, Marie ^a   Eisma, Maarten C ^a,d   Michie, Susan ^e   Hartmann Boyce, Jamie ^f   West, Robert ^e   Viechtbauer, Wolfgang ^g   de Bruin, Marijn ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ABERDEEN   (United Kingdom)

^b NOTTINGHAM TRENT UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^c NHS EDUCATION FOR SCOTLAND   (United Kingdom)

^d UNIVERSITY OF GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

^e UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^f UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^g MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Behavior change technique; Delivery style; Reliability; Smoking cessation; Systematic review; Tailoring

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR CHANGE; CLINICAL TRIAL (TOPIC); HUMAN; MEDICATION COMPLIANCE; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RELIABILITY; SMOKING CESSATION; SYNTHESIS; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; TAXONOMY; BEHAVIOR THERAPY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC);

BEHAVIOR THERAPY; HUMANS; OUTCOME AND PROCESS ASSESSMENT, HEALTH CARE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC; SMOKING CESSATION; SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS AS TOPIC;

EID: 85065597766     PISSN: 08836612     EISSN: 15324796     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/abm/kay068     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Gakidou E, Afshin A, Abajobir AA, et al. Global, regional, and national comparative risk assessment of 84 behavioural, environmental and occupational, and metabolic risks or clusters of risks, 1990–2016. Lancet. 2017;390:1345–1422.
2. Goetzel RZ, Anderson DR, Whitmer RW, Ozminkowski RJ, Dunn RL, Wasserman J; Health Enhancement Research Organization (HERO) Research Committee. The relationship between modifiable health risks and health care expenditures. An analysis of the multi-employer HERO health risk and cost database. J Occup Environ Med. 1998;40:843–854.
3. Merrill RM, Aldana SG, Pope JE, et al.; HERO Research Study Subcommittee. Self-rated job performance and absenteeism according to employee engagement, health behaviors, and physical health. J Occup Environ Med. 2013;55:10–18.
4. Michie S, Richardson M, Johnston M, et al. The behavior change technique taxonomy (v1) of 93 hierarchically clustered techniques: Building an international consensus for the reporting of behavior change interventions. Ann Behav Med. 2013;46:81–95.
5. Black N, Mullan B, Sharpe L. Computer-delivered interventions for reducing alcohol consumption: Meta-analysis and meta-regression using behaviour change techniques and theory. Health Psychol Rev. 2016;10:341–357.
6. British Websites. BCT Taxonomy v1: Interventions. Available at https://www.bct-taxonomy.com/interventions. Accessibility verified February 21, 2018.
7. Dombrowski SU, Sniehotta FF, Avenell A, et al. Identifying active ingredients in complex behavioural interventions for obese adults with obesity-related co-morbidities or additional risk factors for co-morbidities: A systematic review. Health Psychol Rev. 2012;6:7–32.
8. Michie S, Abraham C, Whittington C, McAteer J, Gupta S. Effective techniques in healthy eating and physical activity interventions: A meta-regression. Health Psychol. 2009;28:690–701.
9. Peters GJ, de Bruin M, Crutzen R. Everything should be as simple as possible, but no simpler: Towards a protocol for accumulating evidence regarding the active content of health behaviour change interventions. Health Psychol Rev. 2015;9:1–14.
10. Bartholomew Eldredge LK, Markham CM, Ruiter RA, Kok G, Parcel GS. Planning Health Promotion Programs: An Intervention Mapping Approach. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons; 2016.
11. Rothman AJ. Toward a theory-based analysis of behavioral maintenance. Health Psychol. 2000;19:64–69.
12. Rothman AJ, Sheeran P, Wood W. Reflective and automatic processes in the initiation and maintenance of dietary change. Ann Behav Med. 2009;38:4–17.
13. Petty R, Barden J, Wheeler S. The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion: Health promotions for sustained behavioral change. In: DiClemente RJ, Crosby RA, Kegler MC, eds. Emerging Theories in Health Promotion Practice and Research. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 2009; 185–214.
14. Noar SM, Benac CN, Harris MS. Does tailoring matter? Meta-analytic review of tailored print health behavior change interventions. Psychol Bull. 2007;133:673–693.
15. Lustria ML, Noar SM, Cortese J, Van Stee SK, Glueckauf RL, Lee J. A meta-analysis of web-delivered tailored health behavior change interventions. J Health Commun. 2013;18:1039–1069.
16. Norris SL, Engelgau MM, Narayan KM. Effectiveness of self-management training in type 2 diabetes: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Diabetes Care. 2001;24:561–587.
17. Davis MK, Gidycz CA. Child sexual abuse prevention programs: A meta-analysis. J Clin Child Psychol. 2000;29:257–265.
18. de Bruin M, Viechtbauer W, Hospers HJ, Schaalma HP, Kok G. Standard care quality determines treatment outcomes in control groups of HAART-adherence intervention studies: Implications for the interpretation and comparison of intervention effects. Health Psychol. 2009;28:668–674.
19. de Bruin M, Viechtbauer W, Schaalma HP, Kok G, Abraham C, Hospers HJ. Standard care impact on effects of highly active antiretroviral therapy adherence interventions: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Arch Intern Med. 2010;170:240–250.
20. Michie S, Wood CE, Johnston M, Abraham C, Francis JJ, Hardeman W. Behaviour change techniques: The development and evaluation of a taxonomic method for reporting and describing behaviour change interventions (a suite of five studies involving consensus methods, randomised controlled trials and analysis of qualitative data). Health Technol Assess. 2015;19:1–188.
21. de Bruin M, Viechtbauer W, Eisma MC, et al. Identifying effective behavioural components of Intervention and Comparison group support provided in SMOKing cEssation (IC-SMOKE) interventions: A systematic review protocol. Syst Rev. 2016;5:77.
22. Gwet KL. Computing inter-rater reliability and its variance in the presence of high agreement. Br J Math Stat Psychol. 2008;61:29–48.
23. Byrt T, Bishop J, Carlin JB. Bias, prevalence and kappa. J Clin Epidemiol. 1993;46:423–429.
24. Wongpakaran N, Wongpakaran T, Wedding D, Gwet KL. A comparison of Cohen’s Kappa and Gwet’s AC1 when calculating inter-rater reliability coefficients: A study conducted with personality disorder samples. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013;13:61.
25. Chen G, Faris P, Hemmelgarn B, Walker RL, Quan H. Measuring agreement of administrative data with chart data using prevalence unadjusted and adjusted kappa. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2009;9:5.
26. Altman DG. Practical Statistics for Medical Research. London, UK: CRC press; 1990.
27. Piper ME, Smith SS, Schlam TR, et al. A randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial of 5 smoking cessation pharmacotherapies. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2009;66:1253–1262.
28. Higgins JP, Green S. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. West Sussex, UK: John Wiley & Sons; 2011.
29. Kwasnicka D, Dombrowski SU, White M, Sniehotta F. Theoretical explanations for maintenance of behaviour change: A systematic review of behaviour theories. Health Psychol Rev. 2016;10:277–296.